Literature DB >> 16564618

A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury.

Felipe Fregni1, Paulo S Boggio, Moises C Lima, Merari J L Ferreira, Tim Wagner, Sergio P Rigonatti, Anita W Castro, Daniel R Souza, Marcelo Riberto, Steven D Freedman, Michael A Nitsche, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

Past evidence has shown that motor cortical stimulation with invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation is effective to relieve central pain. Here we aimed to study the effects of another, very safe technique of non-invasive brain stimulation--transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)--on pain control in patients with central pain due to traumatic spinal cord injury. Patients were randomized to receive sham or active motor tDCS (2mA, 20 min for 5 consecutive days). A blinded evaluator rated the pain using the visual analogue scale for pain, Clinician Global Impression and Patient Global Assessment. Safety was assessed with a neuropsychological battery and confounders with the evaluation of depression and anxiety changes. There was a significant pain improvement after active anodal stimulation of the motor cortex, but not after sham stimulation. These results were not confounded by depression or anxiety changes. Furthermore, cognitive performance was not significantly changed throughout the trial in both treatment groups. The results of our study suggest that this new approach of cortical stimulation can be effective to control pain in patients with spinal cord lesion. We discuss potential mechanisms for pain amelioration after tDCS, such as a secondary modulation of thalamic nuclei activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16564618     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  210 in total

1.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits.

Authors:  Javier Márquez-Ruiz; Rocío Leal-Campanario; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Fabrice Wendling; Pedro C Miranda; Giulio Ruffini; Agnès Gruart; José María Delgado-García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  [Transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in the therapy of pain].

Authors:  A Antal; W Paulus
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Brain stimulation for the treatment of pain: A review of costs, clinical effects, and mechanisms of treatment for three different central neuromodulatory approaches.

Authors:  Soroush Zaghi; Nikolas Heine; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Manag       Date:  2009-08

5.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the auditory mismatch negativity response and working memory performance in schizophrenia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Danielle Impey; Ashley Baddeley; Renee Nelson; Alain Labelle; Verner Knott
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex (anode) and contralateral supraorbital area (cathode) on clinical pain severity and mobility performance in persons with knee osteoarthritis: An experimenter- and participant-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Hyochol Ahn; Adam J Woods; Mark E Kunik; Abhishek Bhattacharjee; Zhiguo Chen; Eunyoung Choi; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  The use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a tool for the measurement of bi-hemispheric transcranial electric stimulation effects on primary motor cortex metabolism.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Vincent Beaulé; Sébastien Proulx; Louis-Philippe Lafleur; Julien Doyon; Małgorzata Marjańska; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Patients' perspectives on pain.

Authors:  Cecilia Norrbrink; Monika Löfgren; Judith P Hunter; Jaqueline Ellis
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.