P Kennedy1,2, L Hasson1. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology, The National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK. 2. Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the return-to-work intentions during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Tertiary care, spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Ayelsbury, UK. METHODS: Employment outcomes were obtained from the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC), for all patients admitted to the unit between February 2008 and October 2014. NAC1 is completed within 4 weeks post-mobilisation and NAC2 upon the patient moving to the pre-discharge ward. Data from 362 participants were analysed for return-to-work intentions, by gender, age and injury severity. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the sample population was employed at the time of their injury. At NAC1, 22.4% of individuals had made plans to return to work, whereas 44.2% had not; at NAC2, 34.3% had made plans to return to work and 31.2% had not. This difference was found to be statistically significant. There were significant differences in return-to-work intentions by injury severity at NAC1 but not NAC2, and by age group at NAC2 but not NAC1. CONCLUSION: Less than half of those employed at the time of their injury had made plans to return to work before their discharge from the unit. The low proportion of individuals with SCI returning to work--just one in three--is concerning in view of the lost health and psychosocial benefits, and requires greater prominence during rehabilitation. Future research into effective employment interventions to improve employment outcomes in this population is required.
STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the return-to-work intentions during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Tertiary care, spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Ayelsbury, UK. METHODS: Employment outcomes were obtained from the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC), for all patients admitted to the unit between February 2008 and October 2014. NAC1 is completed within 4 weeks post-mobilisation and NAC2 upon the patient moving to the pre-discharge ward. Data from 362 participants were analysed for return-to-work intentions, by gender, age and injury severity. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the sample population was employed at the time of their injury. At NAC1, 22.4% of individuals had made plans to return to work, whereas 44.2% had not; at NAC2, 34.3% had made plans to return to work and 31.2% had not. This difference was found to be statistically significant. There were significant differences in return-to-work intentions by injury severity at NAC1 but not NAC2, and by age group at NAC2 but not NAC1. CONCLUSION: Less than half of those employed at the time of their injury had made plans to return to work before their discharge from the unit. The low proportion of individuals with SCI returning to work--just one in three--is concerning in view of the lost health and psychosocial benefits, and requires greater prominence during rehabilitation. Future research into effective employment interventions to improve employment outcomes in this population is required.
Authors: James S Krause; Joseph V Terza; Mujde Erten; Kendrea L Focht; Clara E Dismuke Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Caroline J Anderson; Lawrence C Vogel; Kathleen M Chlan; Randal R Betz; Craig M McDonald Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.985