J S Krause1, K S Reed. 1. Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. krause@musc.edu
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators to employment after spinal cord injury (SCI) and their relationship with labor force participation. METHODS: Participants were initially identified through specialty hospitals in the Midwest and Southeastern United States of America. 781 adults with traumatic SCI, at least 1 year post-injury, and between the ages of 18-64, participated. A 30-item instrument on barriers and facilitators to employment was administered. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and comparisons of scores as a function of employment status. RESULTS: EFA indicated six primary themes (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.040), including: (a) resources, (b) health status, (c) disability considerations, (d) lack of importance, (e) disincentives and (f) motivation. CFA indicated an acceptable fit (RMSEA=0.078). Univariate analyses indicated each item and factor was significantly different as a function of labor force participation. After controlling for biographical and injury factors, multinomial logistic regression indicated three factors significantly differentiated those never employed, those currently unemployed but had worked since injury and those currently employed. Those employed reported higher scores for resources and motivation and lower scores for lack of importance. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers and facilitators were consistently related to labor force participation, with facilitators more highly related to labor force participation than barriers. Although loss of financial and medical benefits (disincentives) as well as health status have been reported as barriers to employment, they were not as highly correlated with labor force participation as were other factors.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators to employment after spinal cord injury (SCI) and their relationship with labor force participation. METHODS:Participants were initially identified through specialty hospitals in the Midwest and Southeastern United States of America. 781 adults with traumatic SCI, at least 1 year post-injury, and between the ages of 18-64, participated. A 30-item instrument on barriers and facilitators to employment was administered. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and comparisons of scores as a function of employment status. RESULTS: EFA indicated six primary themes (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.040), including: (a) resources, (b) health status, (c) disability considerations, (d) lack of importance, (e) disincentives and (f) motivation. CFA indicated an acceptable fit (RMSEA=0.078). Univariate analyses indicated each item and factor was significantly different as a function of labor force participation. After controlling for biographical and injury factors, multinomial logistic regression indicated three factors significantly differentiated those never employed, those currently unemployed but had worked since injury and those currently employed. Those employed reported higher scores for resources and motivation and lower scores for lack of importance. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers and facilitators were consistently related to labor force participation, with facilitators more highly related to labor force participation than barriers. Although loss of financial and medical benefits (disincentives) as well as health status have been reported as barriers to employment, they were not as highly correlated with labor force participation as were other factors.
Authors: Annelie Schedin Leiulfsrud; Erling F Solheim; Jan D Reinhardt; Marcel W M Post; Jane Horsewell; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Håkon Leiulfsrud Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Ellen H Roels; Michiel F Reneman; Peter W New; Carlotte Kiekens; Lot Van Roey; Andrea Townson; Giorgio Scivoletto; Eimear Smith; Inge Eriks-Hoogland; Stefan Staubli; Marcel W M Post Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2020
Authors: Cheri Blauwet; Supreetha Sudhakar; Ashley L Doherty; Eric Garshick; Ross Zafonte; Leslie R Morse Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Lynn A Worobey; Allen W Heinemann; Kim D Anderson; Denise Fyffe; Trevor A Dyson-Hudson; Theresa Berner; Michael L Boninger Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 3.966