Lucy Liu1, Methodius G Tuuli2, Kimberly A Roehl2, Anthony O Odibo2, George A Macones2, Alison G Cahill2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: liul@wudosis.wustl.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify electronic fetal monitoring patterns that are associated with neonatal respiratory morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: In an on-going prospective cohort study of >8000 consecutive term, vertex, nonanomalous singleton pregnancies during labor, we performed this analysis within the first 5000 women as a representative sample. Electronic fetal monitoring patterns in the 30 minutes preceding delivery were extracted by trained obstetrics research nurses, who were blinded to clinical data, using the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development system; the data were compared between those with respiratory morbidity and healthy infants (no morbidities). The primary outcome was neonatal respiratory morbidity, which was defined as either oxygen requirement at ≥6 hours of life or any mechanical ventilation in the first 24 hours. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Of 4736 neonates, 175 (3.4%) experienced respiratory morbidity. Most electronic fetal monitoring patterns were category II (96.6%; n = 4575). Baseline tachycardia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-4.4), marked variability (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-5.0), and prolonged decelerations (aOR,2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-5.0) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of term neonatal respiratory morbidity. Accelerations and persistent moderate variability were both significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of respiratory morbidity. CONCLUSION: Specific features of category II electronic fetal monitoring patterns make respiratory morbidity more likely in nonanomalous term infants. Tachycardia, marked variability, or prolonged decelerations before delivery can assist providers in anticipating the potential need for neonatal respiratory support.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify electronic fetal monitoring patterns that are associated with neonatal respiratory morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: In an on-going prospective cohort study of >8000 consecutive term, vertex, nonanomalous singleton pregnancies during labor, we performed this analysis within the first 5000 women as a representative sample. Electronic fetal monitoring patterns in the 30 minutes preceding delivery were extracted by trained obstetrics research nurses, who were blinded to clinical data, using the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development system; the data were compared between those with respiratory morbidity and healthy infants (no morbidities). The primary outcome was neonatal respiratory morbidity, which was defined as either oxygen requirement at ≥6 hours of life or any mechanical ventilation in the first 24 hours. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Of 4736 neonates, 175 (3.4%) experienced respiratory morbidity. Most electronic fetal monitoring patterns were category II (96.6%; n = 4575). Baseline tachycardia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-4.4), marked variability (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-5.0), and prolonged decelerations (aOR,2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-5.0) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of term neonatal respiratory morbidity. Accelerations and persistent moderate variability were both significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of respiratory morbidity. CONCLUSION: Specific features of category II electronic fetal monitoring patterns make respiratory morbidity more likely in nonanomalous term infants. Tachycardia, marked variability, or prolonged decelerations before delivery can assist providers in anticipating the potential need for neonatal respiratory support.
Authors: Jean-Bernard Gouyon; C Ribakovsky; C Ferdynus; C Quantin; P Sagot; B Gouyon Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Neil N Finer; Waldemar A Carlo; Michele C Walsh; Wade Rich; Marie G Gantz; Abbot R Laptook; Bradley A Yoder; Roger G Faix; Abhik Das; W Kenneth Poole; Edward F Donovan; Nancy S Newman; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Ivan D Frantz; Susie Buchter; Pablo J Sánchez; Kathleen A Kennedy; Nirupama Laroia; Brenda B Poindexter; C Michael Cotten; Krisa P Van Meurs; Shahnaz Duara; Vivek Narendran; Beena G Sood; T Michael O'Shea; Edward F Bell; Vineet Bhandari; Kristi L Watterberg; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-05-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alan T N Tita; Paula L McGee; Uma M Reddy; Steven L Bloom; Michael W Varner; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; Alan M Peaceman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Catalin Buhimschi Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 3.079
Authors: Brock Polnaszek; Julia D López; Reece Clark; Nandini Raghuraman; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2019-10-02 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Thâmila Kamila de Souza Medeiros; Mirela Dobre; Daniela Monteiro Baptista da Silva; Andrei Brateanu; Ovidiu Constantin Baltatu; Luciana Aparecida Campos Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.566