Literature DB >> 7756199

Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section.

J J Morrison1, J M Rennie, P J Milton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the timing of delivery between 37 and 42 weeks gestation influences neonatal respiratory outcome and thus provide information which can be used to aid planning of elective delivery at term.
DESIGN: All cases of respiratory distress syndrome or transient tachypnoea at term requiring admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were recorded prospectively for nine years.
SETTING: Rosie Maternity Hospital, Cambridge.
SUBJECTS: During this time 33,289 deliveries occurred at or after 37 weeks of gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This information enabled calculation of the relative risk of respiratory morbidity for respiratory distress syndrome or transient tachypnoea in relation to mode of delivery and onset of parturition for each week of gestation at term.
RESULTS: The incidence of respiratory distress syndrome at term was 2.2/1000 deliveries (95% CI; 1.7-2.7). The incidence of transient tachypnoea was 5.7/1000 deliveries (95% CI; 4.9-6.5). The incidence of respiratory morbidity was significantly higher for the group delivered by caesarean section before the onset of labour (35.5/1000) compared with caesarean section during labour (12.2/1000) (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI 1.9-4.4; P < 0.001), and compared with vaginal delivery (5.3/1000) (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% CI 5.2-8.9; P < 0.001). The relative risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity for delivery by caesarean section before the onset of labour during the week 37+0 to 37+6 compared with the week 38+0 to 38+6 was 1.74 (95% CI 1.1-2.8; P < 0.02) and during the week 38+0 to 38+6 compared with the week 39+0 to 39+6 was 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-4.8; P < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction in neonatal respiratory morbidity would be obtained if elective caesarean section was performed in the week 39+0 to 39+6 of pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7756199     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  81 in total

1.  Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue.

Authors:  K Groom; S P Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-15

2.  Rupture of a cesarean-scarred uterus: a community hospital experience.

Authors:  P A Poma
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Volume and secretion rate of lung liquid in the final days of gestation and labour in the fetal sheep.

Authors:  R E Pfister; C A Ramsden; H L Neil; M A Kyriakides; P J Berger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Elective cesarean section.

Authors:  Michael C Klein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?

Authors:  Mary E Hannah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial.

Authors:  Peter Stutchfield; Rhiannon Whitaker; Ian Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-22

7.  Giving steroids before elective caesarean section.

Authors:  Philip J Steer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-24

8.  Neonatal outcomes after demonstrated fetal lung maturity before 39 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Dwight J Rouse; Merry Lynn Mann; Victoria Chapman; Waldemar A Carlo; Alan T N Tita
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Neonatal respiratory morbidity at term and the risk of childhood asthma.

Authors:  G C S Smith; A M Wood; I R White; J P Pell; A D Cameron; R Dobbie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Pelvic floor consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request in women with a single birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Julie S Ivy; Divya A Patel; Sejal N Patel; Dean G Smith; Scott B Ransom; Dee Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.