Swati Rane1, Pratik Talati2, Manus J Donahue1,2,3, Stephan Heckers2. 1. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Neurology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Inflow-vascular space occupancy (iVASO) measures arterial cerebral blood volume (aCBV) using accurate blood water nulling (inversion time [TI]) when arterial blood reaches the capillary, i.e., at the arterial arrival time. This work assessed the reproducibility of iVASO measurements in the hippocampus and cortex at multiple TIs. METHODS: The iVASO approach was implemented at multiple TIs in 10 healthy volunteers at 3 Tesla. aCBV values were measured at each TI in the left and right hippocampus, and the cortex. Reproducibility of aCBV measurements within scans (same day) and across sessions (different days) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Overall hippocampal aCBV was significantly higher than cortical aCBV, likely due to higher gray matter volume. Hippocampal ICC values were high at short TIs (≤914 ms; intrascan values = 0.80-0.96, interscan values = 0.61-0.91). Cortically, high ICC values were observed at intermediate TIs of 914 (intra: 0.93, inter: 0.87) and 1034 ms (intra: 0.96, inter: 0.86). The ICC values were comparable to established contrast-based CBV measures. CONCLUSION: iVASO measurements are reproducible within and across sessions. TIs for iVASO measurements should be chosen carefully, taking into account heterogeneous arterial arrival times in different brain regions. Magn Reson Med 75:2379-2387, 2016.
PURPOSE: Inflow-vascular space occupancy (iVASO) measures arterial cerebral blood volume (aCBV) using accurate blood water nulling (inversion time [TI]) when arterial blood reaches the capillary, i.e., at the arterial arrival time. This work assessed the reproducibility of iVASO measurements in the hippocampus and cortex at multiple TIs. METHODS: The iVASO approach was implemented at multiple TIs in 10 healthy volunteers at 3 Tesla. aCBV values were measured at each TI in the left and right hippocampus, and the cortex. Reproducibility of aCBV measurements within scans (same day) and across sessions (different days) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Overall hippocampal aCBV was significantly higher than cortical aCBV, likely due to higher gray matter volume. Hippocampal ICC values were high at short TIs (≤914 ms; intrascan values = 0.80-0.96, interscan values = 0.61-0.91). Cortically, high ICC values were observed at intermediate TIs of 914 (intra: 0.93, inter: 0.87) and 1034 ms (intra: 0.96, inter: 0.86). The ICC values were comparable to established contrast-based CBV measures. CONCLUSION: iVASO measurements are reproducible within and across sessions. TIs for iVASO measurements should be chosen carefully, taking into account heterogeneous arterial arrival times in different brain regions. Magn Reson Med 75:2379-2387, 2016.
Authors: M E Henry; M J Kaufman; N Lange; M E Schmidt; S Purcell; J Cote; D M Perron-Henry; E Stoddard; B M Cohen; P F Renshaw Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2001-06-13 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Laurentius Huber; Dimo Ivanov; Steffen N Krieger; Markus N Streicher; Toralf Mildner; Benedikt A Poser; Harald E Möller; Robert Turner Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Manus J Donahue; Jakob U Blicher; Leif Østergaard; David A Feinberg; Bradley J MacIntosh; Karla L Miller; Matthias Günther; Peter Jezzard Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-08-05 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Xiufeng Li; Subhendra N Sarkar; David E Purdy; Jeffrey S Spence; Robert W Haley; Richard W Briggs Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Jun Hua; Manus J Donahue; Jason M Zhao; Ksenija Grgac; Alan J Huang; Jinyuan Zhou; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Danny J J Wang; Jeffry R Alger; Joe X Qiao; Matthias Gunther; Whitney B Pope; Jeffrey L Saver; Noriko Salamon; David S Liebeskind Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Lidia Glodzik; Henry Rusinek; Wai Tsui; Elizabeth Pirraglia; Hee-Jin Kim; Anup Deshpande; Yi Li; Pippa Storey; Catherine Randall; Jingyun Chen; Ricardo S Osorio; Tracy Butler; Emily Tanzi; Molly McQuillan; Patrick Harvey; Stephen K Williams; Gbenga Ogedegbe; James S Babb; Mony J de Leon Journal: Hypertension Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jun Hua; SeungWook Lee; Nicholas I S Blair; Michael Wyss; Jiri M G van Bergen; Simon J Schreiner; Sonja M Kagerer; Sandra E Leh; Anton F Gietl; Valerie Treyer; Alfred Buck; Roger M Nitsch; Klaas P Pruessmann; Hanzhang Lu; Peter C M Van Zijl; Marilyn Albert; Christoph Hock; Paul G Unschuld Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Jun Hua; Allison S Brandt; SeungWook Lee; Nicholas I S Blair; Yuankui Wu; Su Lui; Jaymin Patel; Andreia V Faria; Issel Anne L Lim; Paul G Unschuld; James J Pekar; Peter C M van Zijl; Christopher A Ross; Russell L Margolis Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Yuankui Wu; Shruti Agarwal; Craig K Jones; Andrew G Webb; Peter C M van Zijl; Jun Hua; Jay J Pillai Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Lidia Glodzik; Henry Rusinek; Tracy Butler; Yi Li; Pippa Storey; Elizabeth Sweeney; Ricardo S Osorio; Adrienne Biskaduros; Emily Tanzi; Patrick Harvey; Christopher Woldstad; Thomas Maloney; Mony J de Leon Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 5.702