Literature DB >> 31624734

An evaluation of biomaterials and osteobiologics for arthrodesis achievement in spine surgery.

Joon S Yoo1, Junyoung Ahn1, Dillon S Patel1, Nadia M Hrynewycz1, Thomas S Brundage1, Kern Singh1.   

Abstract

An increasing variety of orthobiologic materials, including autologous and allogeneic bone graft, bone marrow aspirate, demineralized bone matrix, ceramics, and growth factors are available to the spine surgeon. Although autologous bone graft remains the gold standard material, concerns for failure in achieving fusion have prompted evaluation of current and new biologic materials. As such, this review attempts to summarize the available biologic materials with their pertinent characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and primary uses. 2019 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biologics; allograft; autograft; biomaterials; spine surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31624734      PMCID: PMC6778273          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  52 in total

Review 1.  Demineralized bone matrix and spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  Kenneth J H Lee; Jonathan G Roper; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Platelet-rich plasma in orthopaedic applications: evidence-based recommendations for treatment.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; Allan Mishra; Scott R Rodeo; Freddie Fu; Michael A Terry; Pietro Randelli; S Terry Canale; Frank B Kelly
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Gerald Zimmermann; Arash Moghaddam
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  Bone Morphogenetic Proteins.

Authors:  Takenobu Katagiri; Tetsuro Watabe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Infection in bone allografts. Incidence, nature, and treatment.

Authors:  C F Lord; M C Gebhardt; W W Tomford; H J Mankin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Biology of bone transplantation.

Authors:  H Burchardt
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 7.  Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics.

Authors:  M Jarcho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Radiographic and Clinical Outcome of Silicate-substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP) Ceramic Bone Graft in Spinal Fusion Procedures.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Karishma Parikh; Innocent Njoku; Christoph P Hofstetter; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.

Authors:  Sreeharsha V Nandyala; Steve J Fineberg; Miguel Pelton; Kern Singh
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 10.  Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Athanasios Ververidis; Sotirios Christodoulou; Konstantinos Kazakos; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutics for enhancement of spinal fusion: A mini review.

Authors:  Yidan Zhang; Yu Jiang; Da Zou; Baozhi Yuan; Hua Zhu Ke; Weishi Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ki-Eun Chang; Mohamed Kamal Mesregah; Zoe Fresquez; Eloise W Stanton; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.