Huanhuan Li1, Yuli Wang1, Fan Su1, Jing Li1, Ping Gong1. 1. Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, P. R. China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation detection has become a routine molecular test with significant implications for prognosis and therapeutic options of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, acquiring sufficient amounts of tissue for analyzing EGFR mutations is not often feasible, and not all the patients with sensitive EGFR mutations have benefit from EGFR-TKI treatment. METHOD: EGFR mutations were detected by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) in 44 patients of newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma, and patients with EGFR-positive mutations received EGFR-TKI treatment. The serum cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels were tested before EGFR-TKI treatment and on the 30th days after EGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cases were detected EGFR mutations. EGFR mutation rate of serum COX-2 high-level group was significantly higher than low-level group (92.9% vs. 53.3%, P=0.025). Multivariate analysis showed that serum COX-2 level was independently associated with EGFR mutation (P=0.033, OR=12.385, 95%CI, 1.231-124.567). Analysis of the correlation between clinical characteristics and the response of EGFR-TKI showed that the serum COX-2 high-level group had a better efficacy than low-level group (P=0.000), and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the serum COX-2 level was the independently influencing factor (P=0.004). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients of COX-2 high-level group have longer progression-free survival (PFS, P=0.013), and the Cox regression analysis showed that the same result (P=0.003; OR=0.980, 95% CI, 0.967-0.993). CONCLUSION: The serum COX-2 level seems to be closely associated with EGFR mutations in patients with Lung adenocarcinoma. The serum COX-2 level could help us to predict the responses of EGFR-TKI and the PFS in patients harboring EGFR mutation.
BACKGROUND:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation detection has become a routine molecular test with significant implications for prognosis and therapeutic options of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, acquiring sufficient amounts of tissue for analyzing EGFR mutations is not often feasible, and not all the patients with sensitive EGFR mutations have benefit from EGFR-TKI treatment. METHOD:EGFR mutations were detected by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) in 44 patients of newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma, and patients with EGFR-positive mutations received EGFR-TKI treatment. The serum cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels were tested before EGFR-TKI treatment and on the 30th days after EGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cases were detected EGFR mutations. EGFR mutation rate of serum COX-2 high-level group was significantly higher than low-level group (92.9% vs. 53.3%, P=0.025). Multivariate analysis showed that serum COX-2 level was independently associated with EGFR mutation (P=0.033, OR=12.385, 95%CI, 1.231-124.567). Analysis of the correlation between clinical characteristics and the response of EGFR-TKI showed that the serum COX-2 high-level group had a better efficacy than low-level group (P=0.000), and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the serum COX-2 level was the independently influencing factor (P=0.004). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients of COX-2 high-level group have longer progression-free survival (PFS, P=0.013), and the Cox regression analysis showed that the same result (P=0.003; OR=0.980, 95% CI, 0.967-0.993). CONCLUSION: The serum COX-2 level seems to be closely associated with EGFR mutations in patients with Lung adenocarcinoma. The serum COX-2 level could help us to predict the responses of EGFR-TKI and the PFS in patients harboring EGFR mutation.
Authors: Nagehan Ozdemir Barısık; Sevinc Hallac Keser; Aylin Ege Gul; Sibel Sensu; Nilufer Onak Kandemir; Hasan Fehmi Kucuk; Mahmut Gumus; Nimet Karadayı Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: T Hida; Y Yatabe; H Achiwa; H Muramatsu; K Kozaki; S Nakamura; M Ogawa; T Mitsudomi; T Sugiura; T Takahashi Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1998-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ji Won Lee; Jeong Hwan Park; Ja Hee Suh; Kyung Han Nam; Ji-Young Choe; Hae Yoen Jung; Ji Yoen Chae; Kyung Chul Moon Journal: Korean J Pathol Date: 2012-06-22
Authors: Abu Bakar Siddique; Phillip C S R Kilgore; Afsana Tajmim; Sitanshu S Singh; Sharon A Meyer; Seetharama D Jois; Urska Cvek; Marjan Trutschl; Khalid A El Sayed Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 5.717