Literature DB >> 26190318

Nomogram for predicting 30-day all-cause mortality after transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator lead extraction.

Michael P Brunner1, Changhong Yu2, Ayman A Hussein1, Khaldoun G Tarakji1, Oussama M Wazni1, Michael W Kattan2, Bruce L Wilkoff3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For each clinical circumstance, the benefits of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) need to be weighed against the risks. Clinical decision-making tools for predicting mortality after TLE are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To create a preoperative risk score for prediction of 30-day all-cause mortality after TLE of pacemaker and defibrillator leads.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing TLE at the Cleveland Clinic between August 1996 and August 2011 were included in the analysis. A risk nomogram for predicting 30-day all-cause mortality was developed using baseline clinical variables and multivariable logistic regression modeling. Discrimination and calibration were assessed by using bootstrapping for internal validation. Continuous data are presented as median (25th, 75th percentile); categorical data are presented as number (percentage).
RESULTS: A total of 5521 (4137 [74.9%] pacemaker and 1384 [25.1%] defibrillator) leads were extracted during 2999 TLE procedures (patient age 67.2 [55.2, 76.2] years, 30.2% female). Lead implant duration was 4.7 (2.4, 8.3) years and 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) leads were extracted per procedure. Sixty-seven patients (2.2%) had died by 30 days after TLE. Variables with the highest predictive value for 30-day all-cause mortality included age, body mass index, hemoglobin, end-stage renal disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional class, extraction for infection, number of prior lead extractions performed by the operator, and extraction of a dual-coil defibrillator lead. These variables were used to create a nomogram with a bootstrap-corrected concordance index value of 0.867.
CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day all-cause mortality after TLE can be assessed with good discriminative power using readily available clinical information.
Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extraction; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Lead; Nomogram; Pacemaker; Risk score

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190318     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  12 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk.

Authors:  Khaldoun G Tarakji; Christopher R Ellis; Pascal Defaye; Charles Kennergren
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-05

3.  Disparities in transvenous lead extraction in young adults.

Authors:  Andrzej Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Marek Czajkowski; Dorota Nowosielecka; Paweł Stefańczyk; Konrad Tomków; Anna Polewczyk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Effectiveness and Safety of Transvenous Removal of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Leads in the Real Clinical Scenario.

Authors:  Roberto Costa; Katia Regina da Silva; Elizabeth Sartori Crevelari; Wagner Tadeu Jurevicius Nascimento; Marcia Mitie Nagumo; Martino Martinelli Filho; Fabio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Transvenous Extraction and Removal of Pacing Leads Placed after Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Caleb Norton; Benjamin Holmes; Asad Al Aboud; Eun-Jeong Kim; Holly Gonzales; Christopher Ellis; Roy John; George H Crossley; Jay Montgomery
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-03

6.  Effectiveness and safety of transvenous extraction of single- versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads at single-center experience.

Authors:  Andrzej Ząbek; Krzysztof Boczar; Maciej Dębski; Mateusz Ulman; Roman Pfitzner; Robert Musiał; Jacek Lelakowski; Barbara Małecka
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Double trouble: Management of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection in the setting of severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Tahmeed Contractor; Joshua M Cooper; Purvi Parwani; Islam Abudayyeh; Manolo Garcia Rubio; Ravi Mandapati
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2019-08-22

8.  Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction in the Chinese octogenarian patients.

Authors:  Xu Zhou; Feng Ze; Xuebin Li; Bin Wang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Transesophageal Echocardiography As a Monitoring Tool During Transvenous Lead Extraction-Does It Improve Procedure Effectiveness?

Authors:  Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Andrzej Tomaszewski; Wojciech Brzozowski; Dorota Szcześniak-Stańczyk; Andrzej Kleinrok; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Transvenous Lead Extraction SAFeTY Score for Risk Stratification and Proper Patient Selection for Removal Procedures Using Mechanical Tools.

Authors:  Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Maciej Polewczyk; Andrzej Tomasik; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.