Literature DB >> 26190070

Human screams occupy a privileged niche in the communication soundscape.

Luc H Arnal1, Adeen Flinker2, Andreas Kleinschmidt3, Anne-Lise Giraud4, David Poeppel5.   

Abstract

Screaming is arguably one of the most relevant communication signals for survival in humans. Despite their practical relevance and their theoretical significance as innate [1] and virtually universal [2, 3] vocalizations, what makes screams a unique signal and how they are processed is not known. Here, we use acoustic analyses, psychophysical experiments, and neuroimaging to isolate those features that confer to screams their alarming nature, and we track their processing in the human brain. Using the modulation power spectrum (MPS [4, 5]), a recently developed, neurally informed characterization of sounds, we demonstrate that human screams cluster within restricted portion of the acoustic space (between ∼30 and 150 Hz modulation rates) that corresponds to a well-known perceptual attribute, roughness. In contrast to the received view that roughness is irrelevant for communication [6], our data reveal that the acoustic space occupied by the rough vocal regime is segregated from other signals, including speech, a pre-requisite to avoid false alarms in normal vocal communication. We show that roughness is present in natural alarm signals as well as in artificial alarms and that the presence of roughness in sounds boosts their detection in various tasks. Using fMRI, we show that acoustic roughness engages subcortical structures critical to rapidly appraise danger. Altogether, these data demonstrate that screams occupy a privileged acoustic niche that, being separated from other communication signals, ensures their biological and ultimately social efficiency.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190070      PMCID: PMC4562283          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  Looming biases in monkey auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joost X Maier; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners' assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Drew Rendall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Giraud; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Neural processing of natural sounds.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Julie E Elie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Features versus feelings: dissociable representations of the acoustic features and valence of aversive sounds.

Authors:  Sukhbinder Kumar; Katharina von Kriegstein; Karl Friston; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Phelps; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Rising sound intensity: an intrinsic warning cue activating the amygdala.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Hartmut Schächinger; John G Neuhoff; Fabrizio Esposito; Francesco Di Salle; Christoph Lehmann; Marcus Herdener; Klaus Scheffler; Erich Seifritz
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  43 in total

1.  Mapping 24 emotions conveyed by brief human vocalization.

Authors:  Alan S Cowen; Hillary Anger Elfenbein; Petri Laukka; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2018-12-20

2.  Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).

Authors:  Senthilvelan Manohar; Jaclyn Spoth; Kelly Radziwon; Benjamin D Auerbach; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  The neuroscience of understanding the emotions of others.

Authors:  Robert P Spunt; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Explaining individual variation in paternal brain responses to infant cries.

Authors:  Ting Li; Marilyn Horta; Jennifer S Mascaro; Kelly Bijanki; Luc H Arnal; Melissa Adams; Ronald G Barr; James K Rilling
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-05-03

5.  A Moan of Pleasure Should Be Breathy: The Effect of Voice Quality on the Meaning of Human Nonverbal Vocalizations.

Authors:  Andrey Anikin
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition.

Authors:  Peter M C Harrison; Marcus T Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  A review of decreased sound tolerance in autism: Definitions, phenomenology, and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Zachary J Williams; Jason L He; Carissa J Cascio; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  The paradoxical role of emotional intensity in the perception of vocal affect.

Authors:  N Holz; P Larrouy-Maestri; D Poeppel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Male Carollia perspicillata bats call more than females in a distressful context.

Authors:  Eugenia González-Palomares; Luciana López-Jury; Johannes Wetekam; Ava Kiai; Francisco García-Rosales; Julio C Hechavarria
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Dark, loud, and compact sounds induce frisson.

Authors:  Takuya Koumura; Masashi Nakatani; Hsin-I Liao; Hirohito M Kondo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.