Literature DB >> 28705607

Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).

Senthilvelan Manohar1, Jaclyn Spoth2, Kelly Radziwon2, Benjamin D Auerbach2, Richard Salvi3.   

Abstract

Hyperacusis is a loudness hypersensitivity disorder in which moderate-intensity sounds are perceived as extremely loud, aversive and/or painful. To assess the aversive nature of sounds, we developed an Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP) in which rats altered their place preference in a Light/Dark shuttle box in response to sound. When no sound (NS) was present, rats spent more than 95% of the time in the Dark Box versus the transparent Light Box. However, when a 60 or 90 dB SPL noise (2-20 kHz, 2-8 kHz, or 16-20 kHz bandwidth) was presented in the Dark Box, the rats'' preference for the Dark Box significantly decreased. Percent time in the dark decreased as sound intensity in the Dark Box increased from 60 dB to 90 dB SPL. Interestingly, the magnitude of the decrease was not a monotonic function of intensity for the 16-20 kHz noise and not related to the bandwidth of the 2-20 kHz and 2-8 kHz noise bands, suggesting that sound avoidance is not solely dependent on loudness but the aversive quality of the noise as well. Afterwards, we exposed the rats for 28 days to a 16-20 kHz noise at 102 dB SPL; this exposure produced a 30-40 dB permanent threshold shift at 16 and 32 kHz. Following the noise exposure, the rats were then retested on the ASAP paradigm. High-frequency hearing loss did not alter Dark Box preference in the no-sound condition. However, when the 2-20 kHz or 2-8 kHz noise was presented at 60 or 90 dB SPL, the rats avoided the Dark Box significantly more than they did before the exposure, indicating these two noise bands with energy below the region of hearing loss were perceived as more aversive. In contrast, when the 16-20 kHz noise was presented at 60 or 90 dB SPL, the rats remained in the Dark Box presumably because the high-frequency hearing loss made 16-20 kHz noise less audible and less aversive. These results indicate that when rats develop a high-frequency hearing loss, they become less tolerant of low frequency noise, i.e., high intensity sounds are perceived as more aversive and should be avoided. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avoidance; Hyperacusis; Light-bark box; Noise-induced hearing loss

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28705607      PMCID: PMC5642041          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  47 in total

1.  Neural systems involved in fear and anxiety measured with fear-potentiated startle.

Authors:  Michael Davis
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2006-11

2.  Self-reported and behavioral sound avoidance in tinnitus and hyperacusis subjects, and association with anxiety ratings.

Authors:  Lena Blaesing; Birgit Kroener-Herwig
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  Shedding light on photophobia.

Authors:  Kathleen B Digre; K C Brennan
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey.

Authors:  W C Stebbins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Too much of a good thing: long-term treatment with salicylate strengthens outer hair cell function but impairs auditory neural activity.

Authors:  Guang-Di Chen; Mohammad Habiby Kermany; Alessandra D'Elia; Massimo Ralli; Chiemi Tanaka; Eric C Bielefeld; Dalian Ding; Donald Henderson; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Tinnitus and hyperacusis: Contributions of paraflocculus, reticular formation and stress.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Chen; Guang-Di Chen; Benjamin D Auerbach; Senthilvelan Manohar; Kelly Radziwon; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The relationship between loudness and reaction time in normal hearing listeners.

Authors:  L Marshall; J F Brandt
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Prolonged noise exposure-induced auditory threshold shifts in rats.

Authors:  Guang-Di Chen; Brandon Decker; Vijaya Prakash Krishnan Muthaiah; Adam Sheppard; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Elevated Acoustic Startle Responses in Humans: Relationship to Reduced Loudness Discomfort Level, but not Self-Report of Hyperacusis.

Authors:  Inge M Knudson; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-01

10.  Salicylate increases the gain of the central auditory system.

Authors:  W Sun; J Lu; D Stolzberg; L Gray; A Deng; E Lobarinas; R J Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  11 in total

1.  Unpleasant Sound Elicits Negative Emotion and Reinstates Drug Seeking.

Authors:  Suchan Chang; Yu Fan; Joo Hyun Shin; Yeonhee Ryu; Mi Seon Kim; Scott C Steffensen; Hyung Kyu Kim; Jin Mook Kim; Bong Hyo Lee; Eun Young Jang; Chae Ha Yang; Hee Young Kim
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 2.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Neural signatures of auditory hypersensitivity following acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Matthew McGill; Ariel E Hight; Yurika L Watanabe; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Dongqin Cai; Kameron Clayton; Kenneth E Hancock; Anne Takesian; Sharon G Kujawa; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Noise-Induced loudness recruitment and hyperacusis: Insufficient central gain in auditory cortex and amygdala.

Authors:  Kelly Radziwon; Benjamin D Auerbach; Dalian Ding; Xiaopeng Liu; Guang-Di Chen; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 5.  Mechanisms underlying auditory processing deficits in Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McCullagh; Sarah E Rotschafer; Benjamin D Auerbach; Achim Klug; Leonard K Kaczmarek; Karina S Cramer; Randy J Kulesza; Khaleel A Razak; Jonathan W Lovelace; Yong Lu; Ursula Koch; Yuan Wang
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Interaction of auditory and pain pathways: Effects of stimulus intensity, hearing loss and opioid signaling.

Authors:  Senthilvelan Manohar; Henry J Adler; Kelly Radziwon; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Two novel genomic regions associated with fearfulness in dogs overlap human neuropsychiatric loci.

Authors:  R Sarviaho; O Hakosalo; K Tiira; S Sulkama; E Salmela; M K Hytönen; M J Sillanpää; H Lohi
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 8.  Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.

Authors:  Adam Sheppard; Massimo Ralli; Antonio Gilardi; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  C1ql1 is expressed in adult outer hair cells of the cochlea in a tonotopic gradient.

Authors:  Joyshree Biswas; Robert S Pijewski; Rohit Makol; Tania G Miramontes; Brianna L Thompson; Lyndsay C Kresic; Alice L Burghard; Douglas L Oliver; David C Martinelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Testing the Central Gain Model: Loudness Growth Correlates with Central Auditory Gain Enhancement in a Rodent Model of Hyperacusis.

Authors:  Benjamin D Auerbach; Kelly Radziwon; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.