Literature DB >> 26188274

Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: An assessment of the suitability of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Operational Data Model (ODM).

Vojtech Huser1, Chandan Sastry2, Matthew Breymaier3, Asma Idriss3, James J Cimino4.   

Abstract

Efficient communication of a clinical study protocol and case report forms during all stages of a human clinical study is important for many stakeholders. An electronic and structured study representation format that can be used throughout the whole study life-span can improve such communication and potentially lower total study costs. The most relevant standard for representing clinical study data, applicable to unregulated as well as regulated studies, is the Operational Data Model (ODM) in development since 1999 by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC). ODM's initial objective was exchange of case report forms data but it is increasingly utilized in other contexts. An ODM extension called Study Design Model, introduced in 2011, provides additional protocol representation elements. Using a case study approach, we evaluated ODM's ability to capture all necessary protocol elements during a complete clinical study lifecycle in the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health. ODM offers the advantage of a single format for institutions that deal with hundreds or thousands of concurrent clinical studies and maintain a data warehouse for these studies. For each study stage, we present a list of gaps in the ODM standard and identify necessary vendor or institutional extensions that can compensate for such gaps. The current version of ODM (1.3.2) has only partial support for study protocol and study registration data mainly because it is outside the original development goal. ODM provides comprehensive support for representation of case report forms (in both the design stage and with patient level data). Inclusion of requirements of observational, non-regulated or investigator-initiated studies (outside Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation) can further improve future revisions of the standard. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical protocol; Clinical research informatics; Clinical trial; Standards; electronic Case Report Forms

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26188274      PMCID: PMC4714951          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  19 in total

1.  Implementing Single Source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Rebecca Kush; Liora Alschuler; Roberto Ruggeri; Sally Cassells; Nitin Gupta; Landen Bain; Karen Claise; Monica Shah; Meredith Nahm
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Data standards in clinical research: gaps, overlaps, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; Jeffrey Krischer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Preparing for responsible sharing of clinical trial data.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Jeffrey K Francer; Marc Wilenzick; Patricia Teden; Barbara E Bierer; Mark Barnes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Data standards for clinical research data collection forms: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; Prakash Nadkarni
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Multilingual Medical Data Models in ODM Format: A Novel Form-based Approach to Semantic Interoperability between Routine Healthcare and Clinical Research.

Authors:  B Breil; J Kenneweg; F Fritz; P Bruland; D Doods; B Trinczek; M Dugas
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Terminology representation guidelines for biomedical ontologies in the semantic web notations.

Authors:  Cui Tao; Jyotishman Pathak; Harold R Solbrig; Wei-Qi Wei; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Migraine in women with chronic pelvic pain with and without endometriosis.

Authors:  Barbara Illowsky Karp; Ninet Sinaii; Lynnette K Nieman; Stephen D Silberstein; Pamela Stratton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Kerry Dwan; Douglas G Altman; Lynne Cresswell; Michaela Blundell; Carrol L Gamble; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-01-19

9.  Commonly performed procedures in clinical research: a benchmark for payment.

Authors:  Dinora Dominguez; Mandy Jawara; Nicole Martino; Ninet Sinaii; Christine Grady
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 10.  Sharing clinical trial data on patient level: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Franz Koenig; Jim Slattery; Trish Groves; Thomas Lang; Yoav Benjamini; Simon Day; Peter Bauer; Martin Posch
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.207

View more
  23 in total

1.  Evaluating the Coverage of the HL7 ® FHIR ® Standard to Support eSource Data Exchange Implementations for use in Multi-Site Clinical Research Studies.

Authors:  Maryam Y Garza; Michael Rutherford; Sahiti Myneni; Susan Fenton; Anita Walden; Umit Topaloglu; Eric Eisenstein; Karan R Kumar; Kanecia O Zimmerman; Mitra Rocca; Gideon Scott Gordon; Sam Hume; Zhan Wang; Meredith Zozus
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

2.  Clinical Research Informatics Contributions from 2015.

Authors:  C Daniel; R Choquet
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 3.  Improving the Patient-Clinician Interface of Clinical Trials through Health Informatics Technologies.

Authors:  Jake Carrion
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Unlocking Data for Clinical Research - The German i2b2 Experience.

Authors:  T Ganslandt; S Mate; K Helbing; U Sax; H U Prokosch
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 5.  Advances in Clinical Decision Support: Highlights of Practice and the Literature 2015-2016.

Authors:  R A Jenders
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 6.  Tackling NCD in LMIC: Achievements and Lessons Learned From the NHLBI-UnitedHealth Global Health Centers of Excellence Program.

Authors:  Michael M Engelgau; Uchechukwu K Sampson; Cristina Rabadan-Diehl; Richard Smith; Jaime Miranda; Gerald S Bloomfield; Deshiree Belis; K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Current applications and future directions for the CDISC Operational Data Model standard: A methodological review.

Authors:  Sam Hume; Jozef Aerts; Surendra Sarnikar; Vojtech Huser
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  IRB reliance: An informatics approach.

Authors:  Jihad S Obeid; Randall W Alexander; Stephanie M Gentilin; Brigette White; Christine B Turley; Kathleen T Brady; Leslie A Lenert
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  An ontologically founded architecture for information systems in clinical and epidemiological research.

Authors:  Alexandr Uciteli; Silvia Groß; Sergej Kireyev; Heinrich Herre
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2011-08-09

10.  OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information.

Authors:  Olivier Dameron; Paolo Besana; Oussama Zekri; Annabel Bourdé; Anita Burgun; Marc Cuggia
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2013-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.