Literature DB >> 22580210

Commonly performed procedures in clinical research: a benchmark for payment.

Dinora Dominguez1, Mandy Jawara, Nicole Martino, Ninet Sinaii, Christine Grady.   

Abstract

Slow or insufficient enrollment in clinical research and a high demand for research participants raises questions about the need for and use of incentives to participate, including payment. Much of the available literature on payment to research participants focuses on ethical concerns, and rarely addresses guidelines, benchmarks, or formulas to assist investigators to assign or evaluate appropriate payment for individuals who take part in clinical research trials and procedures. Using four years of data collected about the inconvenience units assigned by intramural investigators to selected clinical research procedures conducted at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center, this study provides payment benchmarks for commonly performed procedures. Results were obtained from data collected on 36,273 incidents of payment made for procedures to research participants from August 2004 to August 2008. Analysis of the inconvenience units value assigned to specific procedures suggests that despite a wide distribution and frequent outliers, a convergence in practice around the center of distribution for most procedures does exist. As one of the first published studies reporting data reflecting payment amount for specific clinical research procedures, these data can guide investigators and institutional review boards as they establish and review an appropriate amount of payment to offer research participants. Our data may be useful in promoting payment standards for procedures, thereby complementing proposals or guidelines that advise payment calculations according to time and procedures. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580210      PMCID: PMC3408804          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  15 in total

1.  What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation.

Authors:  N Dickert; C Grady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Creating a culture of research.

Authors:  Andrew L Avins; Harley Goldberg
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ripley; Francis Macrina; Monika Markowitz; Chris Gennings
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Who's doing the math? Are we really compensating research participants?

Authors:  Elizabeth Ripley; Francis Macrina; Monika Markowitz; Chris Gennings
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants.

Authors:  Emily A Largent; Christine Grady; Franklin G Miller; Alan Wertheimer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

6.  An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Neal Dickert; Tom Jawetz; Gary Gensler; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  A Review of Paying Research Participants: It's Time to Move Beyond the ethical Debate.

Authors:  Elizabeth B D Ripley
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Paying Clinical Research Participants: One Institution's Research Ethics Committees' Perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth B D Ripley; Frank L Macrina; Monika Markowitz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Informative inducement: study payment as a signal of risk.

Authors:  Cynthia E Cryder; Alex John London; Kevin G Volpp; George Loewenstein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: An assessment of the suitability of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Operational Data Model (ODM).

Authors:  Vojtech Huser; Chandan Sastry; Matthew Breymaier; Asma Idriss; James J Cimino
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Research participation, trust, and fair compensation among people living with and without HIV in Florida.

Authors:  Christa Cook; Jasmine Mack; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2017-06-29

3.  Payment expectations for research participation among subjects who tell the truth, subjects who conceal information, and subjects who fabricate information.

Authors:  Eric G Devine; Clifford M Knapp; Ofra Sarid-Segal; Sean M O'Keefe; Cale Wardell; Morgan Baskett; Ashley Pecchia; Katie Ferrell; Domenic A Ciraulo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Critical Transitions: A Mixed Methods Examination of Sleep from Inpatient Alcohol Rehabilitation Treatment to the Community.

Authors:  Alyssa Todaro Brooks; Michael Krumlauf; Craig S Fryer; Kenneth H Beck; Li Yang; Vijay A Ramchandani; Gwenyth R Wallen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ethical Issues in Research Involving Participants With Opioid Use Disorder.

Authors:  Emily Anderson; Lindsay McNair
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2018-04-08       Impact factor: 1.778

6.  Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials : A Qualitative Examination of How Healthy Volunteers Understand Study Risks.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Torin Monahan; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.