Literature DB >> 23620720

Multilingual Medical Data Models in ODM Format: A Novel Form-based Approach to Semantic Interoperability between Routine Healthcare and Clinical Research.

B Breil1, J Kenneweg, F Fritz, P Bruland, D Doods, B Trinczek, M Dugas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Semantic interoperability between routine healthcare and clinical research is an unsolved issue, as information systems in the healthcare domain still use proprietary and site-specific data models. However, information exchange and data harmonization are essential for physicians and scientists if they want to collect and analyze data from different hospitals in order to build up registries and perform multicenter clinical trials. Consequently, there is a need for a standardized metadata exchange based on common data models. Currently this is mainly done by informatics experts instead of medical experts.
OBJECTIVES: We propose to enable physicians to exchange, rate, comment and discuss their own medical data models in a collaborative web-based repository of medical forms in a standardized format.
METHODS: Based on a comprehensive requirement analysis, a web-based portal for medical data models was specified. In this context, a data model is the technical specification (attributes, data types, value lists) of a medical form without any layout information. The CDISC Operational Data Model (ODM) was chosen as the appropriate format for the standardized representation of data models. The system was implemented with Ruby on Rails and applies web 2.0 technologies to provide a community based solution. Forms from different source systems - both routine care and clinical research - were converted into ODM format and uploaded into the portal.
RESULTS: A portal for medical data models based on ODM-files was implemented (http://www.medical-data-models.org). Physicians are able to upload, comment, rate and download medical data models. More than 250 forms with approximately 8000 items are provided in different views (overview and detailed presentation) and in multiple languages. For instance, the portal contains forms from clinical and research information systems.
CONCLUSION: The portal provides a system-independent repository for multilingual data models in ODM format which can be used by physicians. It serves as a platform for discussion and enables the exchange of multilingual medical data models in a standardized way.

Keywords:  CDISC ODM; Semantic interoperability; form exchange; form repository

Year:  2012        PMID: 23620720      PMCID: PMC3613023          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2012-03-RA-0011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  26 in total

1.  Facilitating secondary use of medical data by using openEHR archetypes.

Authors:  Christian D Kohl; Sebastian Garde; Petra Knaup
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

2.  Extended cooperation in clinical studies through exchange of CDISC metadata between different study software solutions.

Authors:  W Kuchinke; S Wiegelmann; P Verplancke; C Ohmann
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  HL7 RIM: an incoherent standard.

Authors:  Barry Smith; Werner Ceusters
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

Review 4.  An electronic medical records system for clinical research and the EMR EDC interface.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Murphy; Frederick L Ferris; William R O'Donnell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Implementing Single Source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Rebecca Kush; Liora Alschuler; Roberto Ruggeri; Sally Cassells; Nitin Gupta; Landen Bain; Karen Claise; Monica Shah; Meredith Nahm
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Electronic Healthcare Record and clinical research in cardiovascular radiology. HL7 CDA and CDISC ODM interoperability.

Authors:  A El Fadly; C Daniel; C Bousquet; T Dart; P-Y Lastic; P Degoulet
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

7.  Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research.

Authors:  H U Prokosch; T Ganslandt
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  CDISC standard-based electronic archiving of clinical trials.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kuchinke; J Aerts; S C Semler; C Ohmann
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  An approach for the semantic interoperability of ISO EN 13606 and OpenEHR archetypes.

Authors:  Catalina Martínez-Costa; Marcos Menárguez-Tortosa; Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databases.

Authors:  Stephanie J Reisinger; Patrick B Ryan; Donald J O'Hara; Gregory E Powell; Jeffery L Painter; Edward N Pattishall; Jonathan A Morris
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  14 in total

1.  Clinical Research Informatics: Recent Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  M Dugas
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

2.  Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: An assessment of the suitability of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Operational Data Model (ODM).

Authors:  Vojtech Huser; Chandan Sastry; Matthew Breymaier; Asma Idriss; James J Cimino
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Simplifying electronic data capture in clinical trials: workflow embedded image and biosignal file integration and analysis via web services.

Authors:  Daniel Haak; Christian Samsel; Johan Gehlen; Stephan Jonas; Thomas M Deserno
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Current applications and future directions for the CDISC Operational Data Model standard: A methodological review.

Authors:  Sam Hume; Jozef Aerts; Surendra Sarnikar; Vojtech Huser
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 5.  Creating a data exchange strategy for radiotherapy research: towards federated databases and anonymised public datasets.

Authors:  Tomas Skripcak; Claus Belka; Walter Bosch; Carsten Brink; Thomas Brunner; Volker Budach; Daniel Büttner; Jürgen Debus; Andre Dekker; Cai Grau; Sarah Gulliford; Coen Hurkmans; Uwe Just; Mechthild Krause; Philippe Lambin; Johannes A Langendijk; Rolf Lewensohn; Armin Lühr; Philippe Maingon; Michele Masucci; Maximilian Niyazi; Philip Poortmans; Monique Simon; Heinz Schmidberger; Emiliano Spezi; Martin Stuschke; Vincenzo Valentini; Marcel Verheij; Gillian Whitfield; Björn Zackrisson; Daniel Zips; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  ODM2CDA and CDA2ODM: tools to convert documentation forms between EDC and EHR systems.

Authors:  Martin Dugas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  ODMSummary: A Tool for Automatic Structured Comparison of Multiple Medical Forms Based on Semantic Annotation with the Unified Medical Language System.

Authors:  Michael Storck; Rainer Krumm; Martin Dugas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Automated UMLS-based comparison of medical forms.

Authors:  Martin Dugas; Fleur Fritz; Rainer Krumm; Bernhard Breil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Integrated data management for clinical studies: automatic transformation of data models with semantic annotations for principal investigators, data managers and statisticians.

Authors:  Martin Dugas; Susanne Dugas-Breit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Validating archetypes for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite.

Authors:  Michael Braun; Alexander Ulrich Brandt; Stefan Schulz; Martin Boeker
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.