Literature DB >> 35513745

Individual recognition and long-term memory of inanimate interactive agents and humans in dogs.

Judit Abdai1, Dalma Bartus2, Sylvain Kraus3, Zsuzsanna Gedai4, Beatrix Laczi4, Ádám Miklósi5,6.   

Abstract

Investigation of individual recognition (IR) is difficult due to the lack of proper control of cues and previous experiences of subjects. Utilization of artificial agents (Unidentified Moving Objects: UMOs) may offer a better approach than using conspecifics or humans as partners. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether dogs are able to develop IR of UMOs (that is stable for at least 24 h) or that they only retain a more generalised memory about them. The UMO helped dogs to obtain an unreachable ball and played with them. One day, one week or one month later, we tested whether dogs display specific behaviour toward the familiar UMO over unfamiliar ones (four-way choice test). Dogs were also re-tested in the same helping context and playing interaction. Subjects did not approach the familiar UMO sooner than the others; however, they gazed at the familiar UMO earlier during re-testing of the problem solving task, irrespectively of the delay. In Experiment 2, we repeated the same procedure with human partners, applying a two-way choice test after a week delay, to study whether lack of IR was specific to the UMO. Dogs did not approach the familiar human sooner than the unfamiliar, but they gazed at the familiar partner earlier during re-testing. Thus, dogs do not seem to recognise an individual UMO or human after a short experience, but they remember the interaction with the novel partner in general, even after a long delay. We suggest that dogs need more experience with a specific social partner for the development of long-term memory.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal-robot interaction; Dog; Individual recognition; Memory; Robot

Year:  2022        PMID: 35513745     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01624-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  27 in total

Review 1.  Using robots to understand animal cognition.

Authors:  Anna Frohnwieser; John C Murray; Thomas W Pike; Anna Wilkinson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Dogs recall their owner's face upon hearing the owner's voice.

Authors:  Ikuma Adachi; Hiroko Kuwahata; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Social discrimination procedure: an alternative method to investigate juvenile recognition abilities in rats.

Authors:  M Engelmann; C T Wotjak; R Landgraf
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1995-08

4.  Asking for help: Do dogs take into account prior experiences with people?

Authors:  Fabricio Carballo; Camila Cavalli; Magalí Martínez; Victoria Dzik; Mariana Bentosela
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The perception of humans by piglets: recognition of familiar handlers and generalisation to unfamiliar humans.

Authors:  Sophie Brajon; Jean-Paul Laforest; Renée Bergeron; Céline Tallet; Nicolas Devillers
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Signaling individual identity versus quality: a model and case studies with ruffs, queleas, and house finches.

Authors:  J Dale; D B Lank; H K Reeve
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Dose-specific effects of scopolamine on canine cognition: impairment of visuospatial memory, but not visuospatial discrimination.

Authors:  J A Araujo; A D F Chan; L L Winka; P A Seymour; N W Milgram
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Dog's discrimination of human selfish and generous attitudes: the role of individual recognition, experience, and experimenters' gender.

Authors:  Fabricio Carballo; Esteban Freidin; Natalia Putrino; Carolina Shimabukuro; Emma Casanave; Mariana Bentosela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An Investigation on Social Representations: Inanimate Agent Can Mislead Dogs (Canis familiaris) in a Food Choice Task.

Authors:  Judit Abdai; Anna Gergely; Eszter Petró; József Topál; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.