Literature DB >> 26186810

Effect of Training and Level of External Auditory Feedback on the Singing Voice: Volume and Quality.

Pasquale Bottalico1, Simone Graetzer2, Eric J Hunter2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that classically trained professional singers rely not only on external auditory feedback but also on proprioceptive feedback associated with internal voice sensitivities.
OBJECTIVES: The Lombard effect and the relationship between sound pressure level (SPL) and external auditory feedback were evaluated for professional and nonprofessional singers. Additionally, the relationship between voice quality, evaluated in terms of singing power ratio (SPR), and external auditory feedback, level of accompaniment, voice register, and singer gender was analyzed.
METHODS: The subjects were 10 amateur or beginner singers and 10 classically trained professional or semiprofessional singers (10 men and 10 women). Subjects sang an excerpt from the Star-Spangled Banner with three different levels of the accompaniment, 70, 80, and 90 dBA and with three different levels of external auditory feedback. SPL and SPR were analyzed.
RESULTS: The Lombard effect was stronger for nonprofessional singers than professional singers. Higher levels of external auditory feedback were associated with a reduction in SPL. As predicted, the mean SPR was higher for professional singers than nonprofessional singers. Better voice quality was detected in the presence of higher levels of external auditory feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: With an increase in training, the singer's reliance on external auditory feedback decreases.
Copyright © 2016 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory feedback; Lombard effect; Singing power ratio; Singing voice; Voice training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26186810      PMCID: PMC4713388          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  7 in total

1.  Level and center frequency of the singer's formant.

Authors:  J Sundberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  The singing power ratio as an objective measure of singing voice quality in untrained talented and nontalented singers.

Authors:  Christopher Watts; Kathryn Barnes-Burroughs; Julie Estis; Debra Blanton
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms.

Authors:  Jonas Brunskog; Anders Christian Gade; Gaspar Payá Bellester; Lilian Reig Calbo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comment on "Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2072-2082 (2009)] (L).

Authors:  David Pelegrín-García
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Singing power ratio: quantitative evaluation of singing voice quality.

Authors:  K Omori; A Kacker; L M Carroll; W D Riley; S M Blaugrund
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  The Lombard effect in choral singing.

Authors:  S Tonkinson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Internal voice sensitivities in opera singers.

Authors:  N Scotto Di Carlo
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 0.849

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Training and Level of External Auditory Feedback on the Singing Voice: Pitch Inaccuracy.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico; Simone Graetzer; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.009

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.