| Literature DB >> 26185622 |
Sayuri Kodama1, Nobuya Fujii2, Tadashi Furuhata1, Naoko Sakurai3, Yoshinori Fujiwara4, Tanji Hoshi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although dietary quality in middle-age and the prime age of a person's work career might be determined by positive emotional well-being based on socioeconomic status (SES), causation among determinants of dietary quality still remains unclear. Our purpose was to elucidate the structural relationships among five-year prior dietary quality, equivalent income, emotional well-being, and a five-year subjective health by sex and age group separately.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary quality; Emotional well-being; Equivalent income; Middle-age; Subjective health
Year: 2015 PMID: 26185622 PMCID: PMC4504118 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-015-0081-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Characteristics of participants
| Men | Women | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 ~ 49 years | 50 ~ 59 years | 60 ~ 64 years |
| 40 ~ 49 years | 50 ~ 59 years | 60 ~ 64 years |
| |||||||||
| n = 298 (26.8 %) | n = 505 (45.4 %) | n = 309 (27.8 %) | n = 373 (26.7 %) | n = 611 (43.8 %) | n = 411 (29.5 %) | |||||||||||
| Socioeconomic status | (SES) | |||||||||||||||
| Equivalent income (03EI) | <1 million yen | n (%) | 35 | 11.7 % | 69 | 13.7 % | 62 | 20.1 % | *** | 78 | 20.9 % | 143 | 23.4 % | 136 | 33.1 % | *** |
| 1million-3million yen | 94 | 31.5 % | 164 | 32.5 % | 157 | 50.8 % | 125 | 33.5 % | 234 | 38.3 % | 180 | 43.8 % | ||||
| 3million-5million yen | 116 | 38.9 % | 147 | 29.1 % | 52 | 16.8 % | 105 | 28.2 % | 140 | 22.9 % | 67 | 16.3 % | ||||
| 5million-7million yen | 50 | 16.8 % | 99 | 19.6 % | 23 | 7.4 % | 61 | 16.4 % | 79 | 12.9 % | 18 | 4.4 % | ||||
| >7million yen | 3 | 1.0 % | 26 | 5.1 % | 15 | 4.9 % | 4 | 1.1 % | 15 | 2.5 % | 10 | 2.4 % | ||||
| Family structure | Single | n (%) | 40 | 13.5 % | 58 | 11.5 % | 37 | 12.1 % | *** | 22 | 5.9 % | 49 | 8.0 % | 54 | 13.1 % | *** |
| Husband and wife | 25 | 8.4 % | 86 | 17.0 % | 83 | 27.0 % | 27 | 7.2 % | 106 | 17.4 % | 127 | 30.9 % | ||||
| Parents-and-children | 123 | 41.4 % | 192 | 38.0 % | 92 | 30.0 % | 174 | 46.6 % | 243 | 39.8 % | 122 | 29.7 % | ||||
| Others | 109 | 36.7 % | 169 | 33.5 % | 95 | 30.9 % | 150 | 40.2 % | 212 | 34.8 % | 108 | 26.3 % | ||||
| Employment patterns | Full‐time | n (%) | 261 | 87.6 % | 431 | 85.9 % | 194 | 63.0 % | *** | 165 | 44.4 % | 255 | 41.9 % | 118 | 28.7 % | *** |
| Part-time | 21 | 7.0 % | 44 | 8.8 % | 54 | 17.5 % | 128 | 34.4 % | 208 | 34.2 % | 126 | 30.7 % | ||||
| Full‐time housewife | 0 | 0 % | 0 | 0 % | 0 | 0 % | 68 | 18.3 % | 125 | 20.5 % | 128 | 31.1 % | ||||
| Out of employment | 16 | 5.4 % | 27 | 5.4 % | 60 | 19.5 % | 11 | 3.0 % | 21 | 3.4 % | 39 | 9.5 % | ||||
| Dietary quality | (03DQ) | |||||||||||||||
| Dietary content | PFDS | mean ± SD* | 18.4 ± 3.3 | (10.0-28.0) | 17.6 ± 3.4 | (8.0-26.0) | 17.5 ± 3.4 | (10.0-26.0) | ** | 20.0 ± 3.4 | (10.0-28.0) | 19.3 ± 3.3 | (10.0-26.0) | 19.1 ± 3.4 | (9.0-26.0) | *** |
| Eating behavior | Eating behavior score | mean ± SD* | 4.9 ± 1.4 | (0.0-8.0) | 5.1 ± 1.4 | (1.0-8.0) | 5.3 ± 1.2 | (1.0-8.0) | *** | 6.2 ± 1.3 | (1.0-8.0) | 6.2 ± 1.2 | (2.0-8.0) | 6.3 ± 1.2 | (1.0-8.0) | n.s |
| Desirable eating behavior | 2.2 ± 1.2 | (0.0-5.0) | 2.4 ± 1.2 | (0.0-5.0) | 2.6 ± 1.0 | (0.0-5.0) | *** | 3.4 ± 1.1 | (0.0-5.0) | 3.5 ± 1.0 | (0.0-5.0) | 3.5 ± 1.0 | (0.0-5.0) | n.s | ||
| Undesirable eating behavior | 2.7 ± 0.6 | (0.0-3.0) | 2.7 ± 0.6 | (0.0-3.0) | 2.8 ± 0.6 | (0.0-3.0) | n.s | 2.8 ± 0.5 | (0.0-3.0) | 2.8 ± 0.5 | (0.0-3.0) | 2.8 ± 0.5 | (0.0-3.0) | n.s | ||
| Emotional well-being | (03EWB) | |||||||||||||||
| Enjoyment & | 0 | n (%) | 22 | 7.4 % | 44 | 8.7 % | 17 | 5.5 % | n.s | 13 | 3.5 % | 22 | 3.6 % | 13 | 3.2 % | n.s |
| 1 | 39 | 13.1 % | 68 | 13.5 % | 42 | 13.6 % | 33 | 8.8 % | 51 | 8.3 % | 33 | 8.0 % | ||||
| 2 | 74 | 24.8 % | 109 | 21.6 % | 79 | 25.6 % | 70 | 18.8 % | 118 | 19.3 % | 70 | 17.0 % | ||||
| 3 | 153 | 51.3 % | 270 | 53.5 % | 160 | 51.8 % | 230 | 61.7 % | 383 | 62.7 % | 281 | 68.4 % | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 1.7 % | 12 | 2.4 % | 10 | 3.2 % | 19 | 5.1 % | 27 | 4.4 % | 9 | 2.2 % | ||||
| 5 | 3 | 1.0 % | 1 | 0.2 % | 1 | 0.32 % | 7 | 1.9 % | 9 | 1.5 % | 5 | 1.2 % | ||||
| 6 | 2 | 0.7 % | 1 | 0.2 % | 0 | 0 % | 1 | 0.3 % | 1 | 0.2 % | 0 | 0 % | ||||
| Enjoyment & | mean ± SD* | 2.3 ± 1.0 | (0.0-6.0) | 2.3 ± 1.0 | (0.0-6.0) | 2.3 ± 1.0 | (0.0-5.0) | n.s | 2.6 ± 0.9 | (0.0-6.0) | 2.6 ± 0.9 | (0.0-6.0) | 2.6 ± 0.8 | (0.0-5.0) | n.s | |
| Close people | Many close people | n (%) | 30 | 10.1 % | 45 | 9.0 % | 23 | 7.5 % | n.s | 44 | 11.9 % | 54 | 8.9 % | 31 | 7.5 % | n.s |
| Several close people | 160 | 53.7 % | 277 | 55.3 % | 162 | 52.9 % | 247 | 66.6 % | 425 | 69.8 % | 283 | 68.9 % | ||||
| Almost no close person | 78 | 26.2 % | 147 | 29.3 % | 85 | 27.8 % | 71 | 19.1 % | 100 | 16.4 % | 76 | 18.5 % | ||||
| No close person | 30 | 10.1 % | 32 | 6.4 % | 36 | 11.8 % | 9 | 2.4 % | 30 | 4.9 % | 21 | 5.1 % | ||||
| Close people score | mean ± SD* | 2.6 ± 0.8 | (1.0-4.0) | 2.7 ± 0.7 | (1.0-4.0) | 2.6 ± 0.8 | (1.0-4.0) | n.s | 2.9 ± 0.6 | (1.0-4.0) | 2.8 ± 0.6 | (1.0-4.0) | 2.8 ± 0.6 | (1.0-4.0) | n.s | |
| Five-year subjective | health (5yrSH) | |||||||||||||||
| Subjective health (SH) in 2003 | Healthy | n (%) | 93 | 31.4 % | 163 | 32.5 % | 96 | 31.7 % | n.s | 123 | 33.0 % | 177 | 29.2 % | 118 | 29.1 % | n.s |
| Somewhat healthy | 163 | 55.1 % | 274 | 54.7 % | 178 | 58.7 % | 207 | 55.5 % | 358 | 59.0 % | 226 | 55.8 % | ||||
| Somewhat unhealthy | 29 | 9.8 % | 46 | 9.2 % | 23 | 7.6 % | 35 | 9.4 % | 55 | 9.1 % | 37 | 9.1 % | ||||
| Unhealthy | 11 | 3.7 % | 18 | 3.6 % | 6 | 2.0 % | 8 | 2.1 % | 17 | 2.8 % | 24 | 5.9 % | ||||
| Subjective health (SH) in 2008 | Healthy | n (%) | 86 | 29.1 % | 146 | 29.1 % | 107 | 34.7 % | n.s | 99 | 27.0 % | 149 | 24.5 % | 112 | 27.3 % | n.s |
| Somewhat healthy | 170 | 57.4 % | 284 | 56.7 % | 169 | 54.9 % | 212 | 57.9 % | 383 | 63.0 % | 241 | 58.8 % | ||||
| Somewhat unhealthy | 34 | 11.5 % | 48 | 9.6 % | 26 | 8.4 % | 48 | 13.1 % | 62 | 10.2 % | 38 | 9.3 % | ||||
| Unhealthy | 6 | 2.0 % | 23 | 4.6 % | 6 | 1.9 % | 7 | 1.9 % | 14 | 2.3 % | 19 | 4.6 % | ||||
Items of enjoyment & ikigai: Exercise and sports, hobby, trip, working or study, relaxing with family, children’s growth, communicating with friends, activities in area or with another groups
PFDS Principle food groups diversity score Chi-square test, n.s non-significant. * mean ± SD* (Minimum - Maximum) of scores. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001
Correlation analysis between five-year survival time and dietary factors
| Correlation coefficients | Points | |
|---|---|---|
| Dietary content | ||
| Fresh milk and milk products | 0.056** | 5point: Almost everyday |
| Green vegetables | 0.045** | 4point: 5 ~ 6 days/week |
| Yellow vegetables | 0.045** | 3point: 3 ~ 4 days/week |
| Potatoes | 0.039** | 2point: 1 ~ 2 days/week |
| Fresh fruits | 0.039** | 1point: Almost not eating |
| Meats | 0.032* | |
| Principle food groups diversity score | 0.060*** | 6 ~ 30point |
| Seaweeds | 0.030n.s | |
| Soybean products | 0.027n.s | |
| Fresh fish and shellfish | 0.009n.s | Out of score |
| Small fish | 0.006n.s | |
| Eggs | −0.017n.s | |
| Eating behavior | ||
| Desirable eating behavior | ||
| Preparing a meal by myself | 0.048** | |
| Obtaining diet and nutrition information | 0.039* | 1point: Yes |
| Consuming diversity foods | 0.038* | 0point:No |
| Having a meal at a fixed time | 0.036* | |
| Using supplement frequently | 0.033* | |
| Undesirable eating behavior | ||
| A lot of food likes and dislikes | −0.076** | 1point: No |
| Skipping a meal frequently | −0.060** | 0point: Yes |
| Having a poor appetite frequently | −0.048** | |
| Eating behavior score | 0.065** | 0 ~ 8point |
| Eating between meals frequently | 0.026n.s | |
| Trying to losing weight | 0.020n.s | |
| Knowing optimal dietary content and quantity | 0.013n.s | |
| Eating outside frequently | −0.029n.s | Out of score |
| Using cooked and instant food frequently | −0.026n.s | |
| Taking enough time for a meal | −0.007n.s | |
| Having optimal dietary quantity | −0.005n.s |
Kendall’s tau rank correlation analysis * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s non-significant
Cronbach’s coefficient α: Principle food groups diversity score (0.727), Eating behavior score (0.470)
Fig. 1Comparison between three categories of the principal food groups diversity score and BMI
Fig. 2The comparison of cumulative survival rate among principal food groups diversity score in three categories
Fig. 3The comparison of cumulative survival rate among eating behavior score in three categories
Fig. 4The comparison of cumulative survival rate among enjoyment & ikigai in three categories
Fig. 5The comparison of cumulative survival rate among close people score in four categories
Results of exploratory factor analysis for the survey items
| Factor loading | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor1 | Factor2 | Factor3 | Factor4 | |
| 03 subjective health | 0.746 | 0.014 | −0.014 | 0.060 |
| 08 subjective health | 0.739 | −0.021 | 0.009 | 0.050 |
| 03 PFDS | −0.016 | 0.754 | −0.039 | 0.279 |
| 03 eating behavior score | 0.016 | 0.531 | 0.082 | −0.268 |
| 03 enjoyment & | −0.036 | −0.010 | 0.750 | 0.160 |
| 03 close people score | 0.034 | 0.005 | 0.501 | 0.068 |
| 03 equivalent income | 0.083 | 0.046 | 0.144 | 0.198 |
| Cumulative contribution ratio | 20.8 % | 32.9 % | 38.4 % | 40.7 % |
| Cronbach’s coefficient α | 0.999 | 0.390 | 0.484 | - |
Maximum likelihood estimation and Promax oblique rotation were performed
03 2003 years, 08 2008 years
Fig. 6Structural relationships among “03 dietary quality”, 03 equivalent income, and “five-year subjective health” in men (left) and women (right)
Standardized effects of the SEM models by sex
| Standardized effects | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|
| Direct effect | ||
| 03EI → 03DQ | 0.103 | 0.197 |
| 03EI → 5yrSH | 0.133 | 0.054 |
| 03DQ → 5yrSH | 0.183 | 0.267 |
| Indirect effect | ||
| 03EI → 03DQ → 5yrSH | 0.019 | 0.052 |
| Comprehensive effect | ||
| 03EI → 03DQ → 5yrSH | 0.151 | 0.106 |
EI equivalent income, DQ dietary quality, 5yrSH five-year subjective health, 03 2003 years, 08 2008 years
Fig. 7Structural relationships among “03 dietary quality”, 03 equivalent income, “03 emotional well-being”, and “five-year subjective health” in men (upper) and women (lower)
Standardized effects of the SEM models by sex and age group separately
| Men | Women | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized effects | 40 ~ 49 years | 50 ~ 59 years | 60 ~ 64 years | All agea | 40 ~ 49 years | 50 ~ 59 years | 60 ~ 64 years | All agea |
| Direct effect | ||||||||
| 03EI → 03EWB | 0.081 | 0.264 | 0.284 | 0.224 | 0.196 | 0.127 | 0.272 | 0.187 |
| 03EI → 03DQ | −0.039 | −0.063 | 0.034 | −0.028 | 0.096 | 0.151 | −0.047 | 0.085 |
| 03EI → 5yrSH | 0.212 | 0.010 | 0.095 | 0.066 | 0.019 | −0.036 | 0.122 | 0.043 |
| 03EWB → 03DQ | 0.299 | 0.488 | 0.802 | 0.533 | 0.333 | 0.409 | 0.580 | 0.461 |
| 03EWB → 5yrSH | 0.314 | 0.461 | 0.482 | 0.378 | 0.249 | 0.055 | 0.349 | 0.205 |
| 03DQ → 5yrSH | 0.039 | −0.009 | −0.213 | −0.005 | 0.131 | 0.237 | 0.047 | 0.155 |
| Indirect effect | ||||||||
| 03EI → 03EWB → 03DQ | 0.024 | 0.129 | 0.228 | 0.119 | 0.065 | 0.052 | 0.158 | 0.086 |
| 03EWB → 03DQ → 5yrSH | 0.012 | −0.004 | −0.170 | −0.003 | 0.044 | 0.097 | 0.027 | 0.071 |
| 03EI → 03EWB → 03DQ → 5yrSH | 0.025 | 0.121 | 0.082 | 0.084 | 0.070 | 0.055 | 0.100 | 0.084 |
| Comprehensive effect | ||||||||
| 03EI → 03DQ | −0.015 | 0.066 | 0.261 | 0.091 | 0.161 | 0.203 | 0.111 | 0.171 |
| 03EWB → 03DQ → 5yrSH | 0.325 | 0.457 | 0.312 | 0.375 | 0.293 | 0.151 | 0.376 | 0.276 |
| 03EI → 03EWB → 03DQ → 5yrSH | 0.237 | 0.131 | 0.177 | 0.150 | 0.089 | 0.019 | 0.222 | 0.107 |
Analyses by sex and age group simultaneously:
CMIN = 51.899, p = 0.556, CFI = 1.000, NFI = 0.971, RMSEA = 0.000, AIC = 363.899
aAnalyses by sex simultaneously:
CMIN = 28.164, p = 0.060, CFI = 0.994, NFI = 0.984, RMSEA = 0.015, AIC = 132.164
EI equivalent income, DQ dietary quality, EWB emotional well-being, 5yrSH five-year subjective health, 03 2003 years, 08 2008 years