| Literature DB >> 23984754 |
Gail Low1, Anita E Molzahn, Donald Schopflocher.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With ever-increasing life expectancy globally, it is imperative to build knowledge of how older peoples' views of their own aging, considering their health-related circumstances, affect quality of life for practitioners and policy-makers alike. Based on our literature review, we wanted to determine whether older adults' attitudes toward their own aging would partly mediate the effect of their health satisfaction ratings upon their quality of life. Furthermore, would these attitudes mediate the relationship between health satisfaction and quality of life in the same way when we account for older adults' country of origin, and their age and gender?Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23984754 PMCID: PMC3765777 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Study variable descriptive statistics across 20 country samples
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ||||||||
| Edinburgh | 34% | 77.35 | 3.7 | 30.39 | 25.23 | 26.34 | 277.85 | 97 |
| (1.07) | (.11) | (.51) | (.53) | (.50) | (5.51) | |||
| Bath | 38.2% | 69.16 | 3.8 | 32.12 | 27.82 | 25.84 | 286.99 | 128 |
| (.61) | (.08) | (.41) | (.47) | (.45) | (3.98) | |||
| Leipzig | 54.8% | 72.32 | 3.3 | 29.16 | 27.99 | 25.3 | 278.09 | 310 |
| (.49) | (.05) | (.31) | (.30) | (.23) | (2.84) | |||
| Barcelona | 44.5% | 71.6 | 3.1 | 26.9 | 26.44 | 27.5 | 240.48 | 218 |
| (.49) | (.06) | (.34) | (.33) | (.29) | (3.62) | |||
| Copenhagen | 49.7% | 71.19 | 3.8 | 30.15 | 28.79 | 27.95 | 297.66 | 298 |
| (.47) | (.05) | (.29) | (.32) | (.27) | (2.74) | |||
| Paris | 50% | 78.3 | 2.8 | 25.08 | 21.41 | 22.69 | 235.93 | 86 |
| (.79) | (.10) | (.67) | (.60) | (.55) | (5.32) | |||
| Prague | 40.4% | 71.18 | 3.1 | 25.73 | 23.89 | 26.16 | 245.91 | 309 |
| (.44) | (.05) | (.33) | (.31) | (.23) | (2.74) | |||
| Budapest | 34% | 73.47 | 3.1 | 26.4 | 24.3 | 26.29 | 239.43 | 279 |
| (.53) | (.05) | (.36) | (.31) | (.26) | (3.19) | |||
| Oslo | 48.4% | 74.22 | 3.7 | 29.91 | 27.15 | 28.24 | 280.84 | 254 |
| (.51) | (.06) | (.30) | (.34) | (.28) | (2.81) | |||
| Victoria | 46.0% | 72.93 | 3.81 | 31.91 | 28.17 | 28.93 | 304.7 | 202 |
| (.60) | (.07) | (.36) | (.41) | (.31) | (3.73) | |||
| Melbourne | 41.7% | 75.62 | 3.6 | 30.46 | 26.5 | 28.33 | 280.29 | 331 |
| (.39) | (.06) | (.31) | (.29) | (.22) | (2.86) | |||
| Seattle | 42.5% | 71.69 | 3.6 | 31.68 | 27.21 | 29.76 | 298.97 | 268 |
| (.51) | (.06) | (.34) | (.34) | (.23) | (3.27) | |||
| Beer-Sheva | 32.6% | 70.16 | 3.5 | 29.4 | 27.94 | 28.16 | 273.67 | 196 |
| (.54) | (.07) | (.43) | (.39) | (.36) | (3.88) | |||
| Tokyo | 47.9% | 68.53 | 3.4 | 28.38 | 28.32 | 25.49 | 265.30 | 144 |
| (.50) | (.08) | (.45) | (.43) | (.34) | (4.23) | |||
| Umea | 48.6% | 72.15 | 3.6 | 29.55 | 26.82 | 28.23 | 275.26 | 393 |
| (.41) | (.05) | (.27) | (.28) | (.23) | (2.33) | |||
| Porto Alegre | 32.6% | 71.69 | 3.7 | 30.07 | 28.3 | 30.46 | 283.09 | 319 |
| (.43) | (.05) | (.32) | (.26) | (.20) | (2.66) | |||
| Montevideo | 26.6% | 72.90 | 3.8 | 27.04 | 29.79 | 30.50 | 281.37 | 184 |
| (.65) | (.07) | (.48) | (.34) | (.28) | (3.8) | |||
| Izmir | 47.7% | 70.92 | 2.9 | 24.22 | 22.4 | 26.84 | 225.13 | 327 |
| (.29) | (.06) | (.33) | (.33) | (.24) | (3.12) | |||
| Geneva | 46.7% | 73.84 | 3.7 | 30.93 | 27.20 | 24.35 | 292.67 | 122 |
| (.64) | (.08) | (.49) | (.32) | (.47) | (4.26) | |||
| Vilnius | 32.3% | 68.45 | 3.0 | 25.45 | 26.07 | 27.40 | 234.09 | 282 |
| (.38) | (.05) | (.34) | (.31) | (.23) | (2.9) |
Multilevel model for global WHOQOL-BREF
| Fixed slope, random Intercept | Fixed effects | | 43485 |
| Intercept | 28.4 (14.4, 42.4)*** | ||
| Health satisfaction | 20.4 (19.2, 21.7)*** | ||
| Physical change | 2.7 (2.5, 2.9)*** | ||
| Psychosocial loss | 2.2 (2.0, 2.5)*** | ||
| Psychosocial growth | 1.2 (0.9, 1.4)*** | ||
| Age | .03 (−0.1, 0.2)a | ||
| Sex | −1.1 (−3.1, 0.9)a | ||
| | Variances | | |
| Residual | 1076.9 (1032.8, 1122.9)*** | ||
| Intercept | 82.8 (41.2, 166.8)** | ||
| Random slope & intercept | Variances | | 43470 |
| Residual | 1065.2 (1020.9, 1111.4)*** | ||
| Intercept | 44.2 (3.6, 549.6)a | ||
| Health satisfaction | 1.8 (0.2, 20.6)a | ||
| Physical change | 0.2 (0.05, 0.5)a | ||
| Psychosocial loss | 0.01 (0.00, 14.5)a | ||
| Psychosocial growth | 0.05 (0.01, 0.4)a |
Age and sex slopes fixed to allow convergence in the random slope and intercept model. Fixed Effects are not shown as they differ only marginally from the fixed slope, random intercept model. CI confidence interval. a NS, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.
Relationships among health satisfaction, attitudes to aging scales, and WHOQOL-BREF
| Satisfaction with health | 1.000 | .429*** | .545*** | .274*** | .669*** |
| Psychosocial loss | .350*** | 1.000 | .365*** | .210*** | .599*** |
| Physical change | .515*** | .303*** | 1.000 | .481*** | .607*** |
| Psychological growth | .236*** | .187*** | .482*** | 1.000 | .369*** |
| BREF | .632*** | .518*** | .575*** | .363*** | 1.000 |
Age, sex, and country partialled (below diagonal) and correlations (above diagonal). df = 4570. *** p < .001.
Figure 1Global QOL path model with standardized coefficient and variance estimates.
Parameter estimates for mediation models for WHOQOL-BREF Domains
| Health satisfaction- > QOL | 0.48(0.45, 0.50)** | 0.28(0.26, 0.31)** | 0.21(0.18, 0.24)** | 0.24(0.21,0.27)** |
| Psychosocial loss - > QOL | 0.22(0.20, 0.24)** | 0.34(0.32, 0.36)** | 0.26(0.23, 0.29)** | 0.28(0.25, 0.30)** |
| Physical change - > QOL | 0.31(0.29, 0.33)** | 0.18(0.15, 0.20)** | 0.08(0.05, 0.12)** | 0.22(0.19, 0.25)** |
| Psychosocial growth - > QOL | −0.07(−0.05, -0.09)** | 0.18(0.15, 0.20)** | 0.15(0.13, 0.18)** | 0.03(−0.01, 0.05)a |
Remaining parameters to those presented in Figure 1. QOL quality of life, CI confidence interval. aNS. ** p < .01