Literature DB >> 26183457

Comparison of swept source optical coherence tomography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Daniel S W Ting1, Gemmy C M Cheung1, Laurence S Lim1, Ian Y S Yeo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, Topcon Medical System, Japan) is known to have longer wavelength than spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT, Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), allowing a deeper penetration into retina and choroidal layers. This objective of this study was to compare the visibility of retinal and choroidal features in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) using SS-OCT and SD-OCT.
DESIGN: This study employs prospective comparative observational case series in Singapore National Eye Center. PARTICIPANTS: There were 20 eyes (20 patients) with PCV confirmed with indocyanine green angiogram.
METHODS: Six pre-specified OCT parameters (presence of polyps, sharp pigment epithelial detachment [PED] peak, notched PED and visibility of full maximum height of PED, inner segment/outer segment [IS/OS] line and choroid-scleral interface [CSI]) were graded using SS-OCT and SD-OCT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Kappa statistics between the two imaging modalities were calculated.
RESULTS: Both SS-OCT and SD-OCT were able to detect polypoidal lesions in the majority of eyes (90% and 85%, respectively). However, SS-OCT had better detection for CSI and IS/OS lines (CSI: 80% vs 45%, P = 0.05; IS/OS line: 65% vs 45%, P = 0.34). For sharp PED peak, notched PED, ability to visualize the full PED height and retinal pigment epithelial line, both OCT machines were able to detect in ≥80% of the eyes.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, SS-OCT and SD-OCT appeared to be similarly effective at detecting most features associated with PCV. However, SS-OCT is more superior in detecting the CSI.
© 2015 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  polyp; polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; swept source optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26183457     DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and optical coherence tomographic angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  K Takayama; Y Ito; H Kaneko; K Kataoka; T Sugita; R Maruko; K Hattori; E Ra; F Haga; H Terasaki
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A quantitative comparison of five optical coherence tomography angiography systems in clinical performance.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Li; Wei Wu; Hao Zhou; Jun-Jie Deng; Meng-Ya Zhao; Tian-Wei Qian; Chen Yan; Xun Xu; Su-Qin Yu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Changes in choroidal vascular parameters following pan-retinal photocoagulation using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jee Taek Kim; Nari Park
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Choroidal Neovascularization Analyzed on Ultrahigh-Speed Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Compared to Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Eduardo A Novais; Mehreen Adhi; Eric M Moult; Ricardo N Louzada; Emily D Cole; Lennart Husvogt; ByungKun Lee; Sabin Dang; Caio V S Regatieri; André J Witkin; Caroline R Baumal; Joachim Hornegger; Vijaysekhar Jayaraman; James G Fujimoto; Jay S Duker; Nadia K Waheed
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Small dome-shaped pigment epithelium detachment in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: an under-recognized sign of polypoidal lesions on optical coherence tomography?

Authors:  Yuwei Wang; Qiyu Bo; Huixun Jia; Mengsha Sun; Yang Yu; Peirong Huang; Jing Wang; Nana Xu; Fenghua Wang; Hong Wang; Xiaodong Sun
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 6.  Novel perspectives on swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Fabio Lavinsky; Daniel Lavinsky
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Choroidal Remodeling in Age-related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A 12-month Prospective Study.

Authors:  Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Yasuo Yanagi; Rupesh Agrawal; Hwei Yee Teo; Sophia Seen; Ian Yew San Yeo; Ranjana Mathur; Choi Mun Chan; Shu Yen Lee; Edmund Yick Mun Wong; Doric Wong; Tien Yin Wong; Gemmy Chui Ming Cheung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Automated Quantitation of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Comparison Study Between Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT Angiograms.

Authors:  Qinqin Zhang; Chieh-Li Chen; Zhongdi Chu; Fang Zheng; Andrew Miller; Luiz Roisman; Joao Rafael de Oliveira Dias; Zohar Yehoshua; Karen B Schaal; William Feuer; Giovanni Gregori; Sophie Kubach; Lin An; Paul F Stetson; Mary K Durbin; Philip J Rosenfeld; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children.

Authors:  Chun On Lee; Xiujuan Zhang; Nan Yuan; Shumin Tang; Li Jia Chen; Carol Y Cheung; Jason C Yam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evaluation of Anterior Chamber Volume in Cataract Patients with Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Wenwen He; Xiangjia Zhu; Don Wolff; Zhennan Zhao; Xinghuai Sun; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.