Literature DB >> 26182962

In vivo Recordings from Low-Frequency Nucleus Laminaris in the Barn Owl.

Nicolas Palanca-Castan1, Christine Köppl.   

Abstract

Localization of sound sources relies on 2 main binaural cues: interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural level differences. ITD computing is first carried out in tonotopically organized areas of the brainstem nucleus laminaris (NL) in birds and the medial superior olive (MSO) in mammals. The specific way in which ITD are derived was long assumed to conform to a delay line model in which arrays of systematically arranged cells create a representation of auditory space, with different cells responding maximally to specific ITD. This model conforms in many details to the particular case of the high-frequency regions (above 3 kHz) in the barn owl NL. However, data from recent studies in mammals are not consistent with a delay line model. A new model has been suggested in which neurons are not topographically arranged with respect to ITD and coding occurs through assessment of the overall response of 2 large neuron populations – 1 in each brainstem hemisphere. Currently available data comprise mainly low-frequency (<1,500 Hz) recordings in the case of mammals and higher-frequency recordings in the case of birds. This makes it impossible to distinguish between group-related adaptations and frequency-related adaptations. Here we report the first comprehensive data set from low-frequency NL in the barn owl and compare it to data from other avian and mammalian studies. Our data are consistent with a delay line model, so differences between ITD processing systems are more likely to have originated through divergent evolution of different vertebrate groups.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26182962     DOI: 10.1159/000433513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  8 in total

1.  Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Coupled ears in lizards and crocodilians.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Hilary Bierman
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Contribution of action potentials to the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of barn owl.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Go Ashida; Anna Kraemer; Thomas McColgan; Kazuo Funabiki; Hermann Wagner; Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Geneviève Laumen; Darrin Reed; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

Review 5.  Evolutionary trends in directional hearing.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Evolution of Sound Source Localization Circuits in the Nonmammalian Vertebrate Brainstem.

Authors:  Peggy L Walton; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  The barn owls' Minimum Audible Angle.

Authors:  Bianca Krumm; Georg M Klump; Christine Köppl; Ulrike Langemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Change in the coding of interaural time difference along the tonotopic axis of the chicken nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.492

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.