Literature DB >> 15136015

Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation.

Mark S Handcock1, James Holland Jones.   

Abstract

Sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs) constitute a major public health concern. Mathematical models for the transmission dynamics of STDs indicate that heterogeneity in sexual activity level allow them to persist even when the typical behavior of the population would not support endemicity. This insight focuses attention on the distribution of sexual activity level in a population. In this paper, we develop several stochastic process models for the formation of sexual partnership networks. Using likelihood-based model selection procedures, we assess the fit of the different models to three large distributions of sexual partner counts: (1) Rakai, Uganda, (2) Sweden, and (3) the USA. Five of the six single-sex networks were fit best by the negative binomial model. The American women's network was best fit by a power-law model, the Yule. For most networks, several competing models fit approximately equally well. These results suggest three conclusions: (1) no single unitary process clearly underlies the formation of these sexual networks, (2) behavioral heterogeneity plays an essential role in network structure, (3) substantial model uncertainty exists for sexual network degree distributions. Behavioral research focused on the mechanisms of partnership formation will play an essential role in specifying the best model for empirical degree distributions. We discuss the limitations of inferences from such data, and the utility of degree-based epidemiological models more generally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15136015     DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2003.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  46 in total

1.  The Likoma Network Study: Context, data collection, and initial results.

Authors:  Stéphane Helleringer; Hans-Peter Kohler; Agnes Chimbiri; Praise Chatonda; James Mkandawire
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2009

Review 2.  Networks and epidemic models.

Authors:  Matt J Keeling; Ken T D Eames
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Partner Naming and Forgetting: Recall of Network Members.

Authors:  David C Bell; Benedetta Belli-McQueen; Ali Haider
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2007-05

Review 4.  Maintenance of endemicity in urban environments: a hypothesis linking risk, network structure and geography.

Authors:  R Rothenberg
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Degree distributions in sexual networks: a framework for evaluating evidence.

Authors:  Deven T Hamilton; Mark S Handcock; Martina Morris
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data.

Authors:  Mark S Handcock; David R Hunter; Carter T Butts; Steven M Goodreau; Martina Morris
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.440

7.  Early assessment of anxiety and behavioral response to novel swine-origin influenza A(H1N1).

Authors:  James Holland Jones; Marcel Salathé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Growth of HIV-1 Molecular Transmission Clusters in New York City.

Authors:  Joel O Wertheim; Ben Murrell; Sanjay R Mehta; Lisa A Forgione; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Davey M Smith; Lucia V Torian
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Preferential attachment in sexual networks.

Authors:  Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio; Ake Svensson; Fredrik Liljeros
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Empiricism and theorizing in epidemiology and social network analysis.

Authors:  Richard Rothenberg; Elizabeth Costenbader
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.