Judith L Griffin1, Kate S Segal1, Shadi Nahvi2. 1. Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; 2. Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY snahvi@montefiore.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Drug users have high rates of tobacco use and tobacco-related disease. Telephone quitlines promote smoking cessation, but their reach among drug users is unknown. We thus aimed to assess utilization of and barriers to telephone quitlines among methadone-maintained smokers. METHODS:Subjects were opioid-dependent smokers in Bronx, New York, methadone treatment programs who were enrolled in a clinical trial ofvarenicline. All subjects were offered referral to a free, proactive quitline. We examined quitline records, surveyed barriers to quitline use, and queried reasons for declining referral. RESULTS: Of the 112 subjects enrolled, 47% were male, 54% were Hispanic, and 28% were Black. All subjects were offered referral, and 25 (22% of study participants) utilized the quitline. Quitline utilizers (vs. nonutilizers) were significantly more likely to have landline phone service (72 vs. 42%, p = .01), interest in quitline participation (92 vs. 62%, p < .01), and willingness to receive calls (96 vs. 76%, p = .02). Nonutilizers were significantly more likely to report cell phone service lapse (38 vs. 14%, p = .04), and difficulty charging cell phones (19 vs. 0%, p = .02). Reasons for quitline refusal included: (a) skepticism of quitline efficacy; (b) aversion to telephone communication; (c) competing life demands (e.g., drug treatment, shelter); and (d) problems with cell phone service or minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite several limitations to quitline access among methadone-maintained smokers, routine quitline referral was associated with 22% utilization. To expand provision of smoking cessation treatment to opioid-dependent smokers, interventions to promote routine quitline referral in substance abuse treatment programs warrant investigation.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Drug users have high rates of tobacco use and tobacco-related disease. Telephone quitlines promote smoking cessation, but their reach among drug users is unknown. We thus aimed to assess utilization of and barriers to telephone quitlines among methadone-maintained smokers. METHODS: Subjects were opioid-dependent smokers in Bronx, New York, methadone treatment programs who were enrolled in a clinical trial of varenicline. All subjects were offered referral to a free, proactive quitline. We examined quitline records, surveyed barriers to quitline use, and queried reasons for declining referral. RESULTS: Of the 112 subjects enrolled, 47% were male, 54% were Hispanic, and 28% were Black. All subjects were offered referral, and 25 (22% of study participants) utilized the quitline. Quitline utilizers (vs. nonutilizers) were significantly more likely to have landline phone service (72 vs. 42%, p = .01), interest in quitline participation (92 vs. 62%, p < .01), and willingness to receive calls (96 vs. 76%, p = .02). Nonutilizers were significantly more likely to report cell phone service lapse (38 vs. 14%, p = .04), and difficulty charging cell phones (19 vs. 0%, p = .02). Reasons for quitline refusal included: (a) skepticism of quitline efficacy; (b) aversion to telephone communication; (c) competing life demands (e.g., drug treatment, shelter); and (d) problems with cell phone service or minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite several limitations to quitline access among methadone-maintained smokers, routine quitline referral was associated with 22% utilization. To expand provision of smoking cessation treatment to opioid-dependent smokers, interventions to promote routine quitline referral in substance abuse treatment programs warrant investigation.
Authors: Shu-Hong Zhu; Christopher M Anderson; Gary J Tedeschi; Bradley Rosbrook; Cynthia E Johnson; Michael Byrd; Elsa Gutiérrez-Terrell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nina A Cooperman; Shou-En Lu; Kimber P Richter; Steven L Bernstein; Jill M Williams Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mackenzie Perkett; Shannon M Robson; Varsha Kripalu; Christina Wysota; Charlotte McGarry; David Weddle; Mia A Papas; Freda Patterson Journal: J Community Health Date: 2017-06
Authors: Danika Tremain; Megan Freund; Paula Wye; Jenny Bowman; Luke Wolfenden; Adrian Dunlop; Kate Bartlem; Christophe Lecathelinais; John Wiggers Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Christine Sheffer; Sharon Brackman; Charnette Lercara; Naomi Cottoms; Mary Olson; Luana Panissidi; Jami Pittman; Helen Stayna Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 3.390