Literature DB >> 12362011

Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers.

Shu-Hong Zhu1, Christopher M Anderson, Gary J Tedeschi, Bradley Rosbrook, Cynthia E Johnson, Michael Byrd, Elsa Gutiérrez-Terrell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telephone services that offer smoking-cessation counseling (quitlines) have proliferated in recent years, encouraged by positive results of clinical trials. The question remains, however, whether those results can be translated into real-world effectiveness.
METHODS: We embedded a randomized, controlled trial into the ongoing service of the California Smokers' Helpline. Callers were randomly assigned to a treatment group (1973 callers) or a control group (1309 callers). All participants received self-help materials. Those in the treatment group were assigned to receive up to seven counseling sessions; those in the control group could also receive counseling if they called back for it after randomization.
RESULTS: Counseling was provided to 72.1 percent of those in the treatment group and 31.6 percent of those in the control group (mean, 3.0 sessions). The rates of abstinence for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, according to an intention-to-treat analysis, were 23.7 percent, 17.9 percent, 12.8 percent, and 9.1 percent, respectively, for those in the treatment group and 16.5 percent, 12.1 percent, 8.6 percent, and 6.9 percent, respectively, for those in the control group (P<0.001). Analyses factoring out both the subgroup of control subjects who received counseling and the corresponding treatment subgroup indicate that counseling approximately doubled abstinence rates: rates of abstinence for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 20.7 percent, 15.9 percent, 11.7 percent, and 7.5 percent, respectively, in the remaining subjects in the treatment group and 9.6 percent, 6.7 percent, 5.2 percent, and 4.1 percent, respectively, in the remaining subjects in the control group (P<0.001). Therefore, the absolute difference in the rate of abstinence for 12 months between the remaining subjects in the treatment and control groups was 3.4 percent. The 12-month abstinence rates for those who made at least one attempt to quit were 23.3 percent in the treatment group and 18.4 percent in the control group (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A telephone counseling protocol for smoking cessation, previously proven efficacious, was effective when translated to a real-world setting. Its success supports Public Health Service guidelines calling for greater availability of quitlines. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12362011     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa020660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  160 in total

1.  Smoking cessation quitlines: an underrecognized intervention success story.

Authors:  Edward Lichtenstein; Shu-Hong Zhu; Gary J Tedeschi
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2010 May-Jun

Review 2.  Telephone consultations.

Authors:  Josip Car; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-03

Review 3.  Promotion of smoking cessation in developing countries: a framework for urgent public health interventions.

Authors:  A S M Abdullah; C G Husten
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  The effects of a multilingual telephone quitline for Asian smokers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shu-Hong Zhu; Sharon E Cummins; Shiushing Wong; Anthony C Gamst; Gary J Tedeschi; Jasmine Reyes-Nocon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Asian-americans, addictions, and barriers to treatment.

Authors:  Timothy W Fong; John Tsuang
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-11

6.  Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology: Toward a Scientifically Principled Approach to Mental and Behavioral Health Care.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; Richard M McFall; Varda Shoham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2008-11-01

7.  Patient navigation to promote smoking cessation among low-income primary care patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Karey S Kenst; Lisa M Quintiliani; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Jennifer Murillo; Lori Pbert; Ziming Xuan; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  J Ethn Subst Abuse       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.507

8.  Local smoke-free public policies, quitline call rate, and smoking status in Kentucky.

Authors:  Anita F Fernander; Mary Kay Rayens; Sarah Adkins; Ellen J Hahn
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2014-01-16

9.  Dissemination of the Look AHEAD Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in the United States Military: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rebecca A Krukowski; Marion E Hare; Gerald W Talcott; Leslie A Gladney; Karen C Johnson; Phyllis A Richey; Mehmet Kocak; Patrick L Keller; Ann Hryshko-Mullen; Robert C Klesges
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  Impact of baseline weight on smoking cessation and weight gain in quitlines.

Authors:  Terry M Bush; Michele D Levine; Brooke Magnusson; Yu Cheng; Xiaotian Chen; Lisa Mahoney; Lyndsay Miles; Susan M Zbikowski
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.