Taylor L Morgan1, Braedon P Young1, Keagan G Lipak1, Vicky Lehmann2, James Klosky3, Gwendolyn P Quinn4, Cynthia A Gerhardt1,5, Leena Nahata1,5,6. 1. The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 4. New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 6. Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
Purpose: Approximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience impaired fertility, which is known to cause psychological distress. Yet, less than 50% of at-risk adolescent and young adult (AYA) males pursue fertility preservation (FP) at diagnosis. Alternatives to biological parenthood (e.g., adoption/sperm donation) may be considered, but little is known about perspectives regarding these alternatives among AYA males and their families. Methods: Families of AYAs were recruited for a mixed-method study examining FP decisions at cancer diagnosis. One month later, 48 participants from 20 families (18 male AYAs, 12-22 years of age, 19 mothers, 11 fathers) completed semistructured interviews, including two questions about: (a) alternative routes to biological parenthood, and (b) their knowledge about the processes involved and/or challenges associated with such alternatives. Verbatim transcripts were coded for thematic content using the constant comparison method. Results: Three main themes were identified, of which two represent both ends of considering alternative parenthood: (a) Willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood, primarily adoption; (b) No consideration/discussion of alternative family building options; and (c) Variable knowledge of alternatives and/or associated challenges. Notably, more AYAs than parents mentioned a specific preference for biological children. Conclusions: One-month postcancer diagnosis, most parents reported willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood for their sons, while AYA males were less knowledgeable or open to these options. Future research should prospectively examine how these attitudes affect FP decisions before treatment. Medical and psychosocial providers should counsel patients and survivors accordingly to optimize reproductive outcomes and prevent psychosocial distress if parenthood goals are unfulfilled.
Purpose: Approximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience impaired fertility, which is known to cause psychological distress. Yet, less than 50% of at-risk adolescent and young adult (AYA) males pursue fertility preservation (FP) at diagnosis. Alternatives to biological parenthood (e.g., adoption/sperm donation) may be considered, but little is known about perspectives regarding these alternatives among AYA males and their families. Methods: Families of AYAs were recruited for a mixed-method study examining FP decisions at cancer diagnosis. One month later, 48 participants from 20 families (18 male AYAs, 12-22 years of age, 19 mothers, 11 fathers) completed semistructured interviews, including two questions about: (a) alternative routes to biological parenthood, and (b) their knowledge about the processes involved and/or challenges associated with such alternatives. Verbatim transcripts were coded for thematic content using the constant comparison method. Results: Three main themes were identified, of which two represent both ends of considering alternative parenthood: (a) Willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood, primarily adoption; (b) No consideration/discussion of alternative family building options; and (c) Variable knowledge of alternatives and/or associated challenges. Notably, more AYAs than parents mentioned a specific preference for biological children. Conclusions: One-month postcancer diagnosis, most parents reported willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood for their sons, while AYA males were less knowledgeable or open to these options. Future research should prospectively examine how these attitudes affect FP decisions before treatment. Medical and psychosocial providers should counsel patients and survivors accordingly to optimize reproductive outcomes and prevent psychosocial distress if parenthood goals are unfulfilled.
Authors: Martine C de Vries; Dorine Bresters; Dirk P Engberts; Jan M Wit; Evert van Leeuwen Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: James L Klosky; Jessica S Flynn; Vicky Lehmann; Kathryn M Russell; Fang Wang; Robin N Hardin; Jasmine R Eddinger; Hui Zhang; Lauren A-M Schenck; Leslie R Schover Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: James L Klosky; Mary E Randolph; Fariba Navid; Heather L Gamble; Sheri L Spunt; Monika L Metzger; Najat Daw; E Brannon Morris; Melissa M Hudson Journal: Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 1.969
Authors: Melissa M Hudson; Kirsten K Ness; James G Gurney; Daniel A Mulrooney; Wassim Chemaitilly; Kevin R Krull; Daniel M Green; Gregory T Armstrong; Kerri A Nottage; Kendra E Jones; Charles A Sklar; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: James L Klosky; Fang Wang; Kathryn M Russell; Hui Zhang; Jessica S Flynn; Lu Huang; Karen Wasilewski-Masker; Wendy Landier; Marcia Leonard; Karen H Albritton; Abha A Gupta; Jacqueline Casillas; Paul Colte; William H Kutteh; Leslie R Schover Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Nilsson; A Jervaeus; C Lampic; L E Eriksson; C Widmark; G M Armuand; J Malmros; M Marshall Heyman; L Wettergren Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Anna L Olsavsky; Charleen I Theroux; Taylor M Dattilo; James L Klosky; Sarah H O'Brien; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 3.838