Literature DB >> 26179990

The wake of hovering flight in bats.

Jonas Håkansson1, Anders Hedenström2, York Winter3, L Christoffer Johansson1.   

Abstract

Hovering means stationary flight at zero net forward speed, which can be achieved by animals through muscle powered flapping flight. Small bats capable of hovering typically do so with a downstroke in an inclined stroke plane, and with an aerodynamically active outer wing during the upstroke. The magnitude and time history of aerodynamic forces should be reflected by vorticity shed into the wake. We thus expect hovering bats to generate a characteristic wake, but this has until now never been studied. Here we trained nectar-feeding bats, Leptonycteris yerbabuenae, to hover at a feeder and using time-resolved stereoscopic particle image velocimetry in conjunction with high-speed kinematic analysis we show that hovering nectar-feeding bats produce a series of bilateral stacked vortex loops. Vortex visualizations suggest that the downstroke produces the majority of the weight support, but that the upstroke contributes positively to the lift production. However, the relative contributions from downstroke and upstroke could not be determined on the basis of the wake, because wake elements from down- and upstroke mix and interact. We also use a modified actuator disc model to estimate lift force, power and flap efficiency. Based on our quantitative wake-induced velocities, the model accounts for weight support well (108%). Estimates of aerodynamic efficiency suggest hovering flight is less efficient than forward flapping flight, while the overall energy conversion efficiency (mechanical power output/metabolic power) was estimated at 13%.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leptonycteris yerbabuenae; aerodynamic efficiency; bat; hovering; wake vortices

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26179990      PMCID: PMC4535406          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  24 in total

1.  Leading-edge vortex improves lift in slow-flying bats.

Authors:  F T Muijres; L C Johansson; R Barfield; M Wolf; G R Spedding; A Hedenström
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Vortex wake, downwash distribution, aerodynamic performance and wingbeat kinematics in slow-flying pied flycatchers.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Melissa S Bowlin; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Energetic cost of hovering flight in nectar-feeding bats (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) and its scaling in moths, birds and bats.

Authors:  C C Voigt; Y Winter
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske; Douglas R Warrick; Christopher J Clark; Donald R Powers; Tyson L Hedrick; Gabriel A Hyder; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Metabolism during flight in the laughing gull, Larus atricilla.

Authors:  V A Tucker
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1972-02

7.  Metabolism during flight in two species of bats, Phyllostomus hastatus and Pteropus gouldii.

Authors:  S P Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Aerodynamics of hovering flight in the long-eared bat Plecotus auritus.

Authors:  U M Norberg
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Metabolic power, mechanical power and efficiency during wind tunnel flight by the European starling Sturnus vulgaris.

Authors:  S Ward; U Möller; J M Rayner; D M Jackson; D Bilo; W Nachtigall; J R Speakman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Kinematics and wing shape across flight speed in the bat, Leptonycteris yerbabuenae.

Authors:  Rhea Von Busse; Anders Hedenström; York Winter; L Christoffer Johansson
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.422

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Aerodynamics of manoeuvring flight in brown long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus).

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Lasse Jakobsen; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Biomechanics of hover performance in Neotropical hummingbirds versus bats.

Authors:  Rivers Ingersoll; Lukas Haizmann; David Lentink
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Ear-body lift and a novel thrust generating mechanism revealed by the complex wake of brown long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus).

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Jonas Håkansson; Lasse Jakobsen; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.