OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of oxalic acid (BisBlock) on restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One operator placed 90 restorations randomly divided into two groups in 20 patients under cotton rolls isolation: Control Group-two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive technique; and Experimental Group-two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive technique with oxalic acid pretreatment after acid-etched dentin. The restorative adhesive system used was XP Bond/Durafill. The restorations were directly assessed by two independent examiners, using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at the baseline and 4 years. Data were statistically analyzed using the Fisher and McNemar tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS:Fifteen patients (75%) were available for recall after 4 years. The McNemar test detected significant differences within the Experimental Group between the baseline and 4-year evaluations for retention (p < 0.05). For the Control Group, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the periods. The Fisher test showed no statistically significant difference between the groups for all other criteria (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: After 4 years of service, the use of oxalic acid did not influence the clinical performance of restorations when it was used under composite resin restorations.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of oxalic acid (BisBlock) on restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One operator placed 90 restorations randomly divided into two groups in 20 patients under cotton rolls isolation: Control Group-two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive technique; and Experimental Group-two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive technique with oxalic acid pretreatment after acid-etched dentin. The restorative adhesive system used was XP Bond/Durafill. The restorations were directly assessed by two independent examiners, using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at the baseline and 4 years. Data were statistically analyzed using the Fisher and McNemar tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Fifteen patients (75%) were available for recall after 4 years. The McNemar test detected significant differences within the Experimental Group between the baseline and 4-year evaluations for retention (p < 0.05). For the Control Group, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the periods. The Fisher test showed no statistically significant difference between the groups for all other criteria (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: After 4 years of service, the use of oxalic acid did not influence the clinical performance of restorations when it was used under composite resin restorations.
Authors: Jorgiana Silva de Assis; Lidiany Karla Azevedo Rodrigues; Cristiane Sá Roriz Fonteles; Regina Cláudia Ramos Colares; André Mattos Brito de Souza; Sérgio Lima Santiago Journal: Braz Dent J Date: 2011
Authors: S M A Silva; J Malacarne-Zanon; R M Carvalho; M C Alves; M F De Goes; A Anido-Anido; M R Carrilho Journal: Oper Dent Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 2.440
Authors: Alexandra Roman; Stefan Ioan Stratul; Darian Rusu; Marius Boariu; Andrada Soanca; Robert Balazsi; Maria Suciu; Mărioara Moldovan; Adriana Elena Bulboacă Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 4.379