Literature DB >> 2617365

Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw instrumentation systems in a corpectomy model.

R B Ashman1, R D Galpin, J D Corin, C E Johnston.   

Abstract

Five different spinal implants, all using pedicle screw attachment to vertebrae, were examined in a one above/one below corpectomy model, to determine 1) the relative stiffness of each construct, 2) the stresses generated in the implant during loading, and 3) the relative fatigue susceptibility of each implant. Results indicated that the relative axial and torsional stiffnesses were similar for all the implants tested (DKS/Zielke, VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne, Luque plate, AO Notched plate). Hence, each of the devices impart approximately the same stability to the spine in this highly unstable model. Stresses measured at the root of the pedicle screws were found to exceed the endurance limit of stainless steel in those systems in which the pedicle screws were attached rigidly to the plates (VSP/Steffee, AO Fixator Interne). Good agreement was found between the measured stresses and stresses derived from static calculations. Comparisons between the stresses from each implant gave a relative measure of fatigue susceptibility that was validated by in vitro cyclic testing. Implants with stresses exceeding the endurance limit failed during the cyclic test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2617365     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198912000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The mechanical role of laminar hook protection of pedicle screws at the caudal end vertebra.

Authors:  J Y Margulies; R S Casar; S A Caruso; M G Neuwirth; T R Haher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation.

Authors:  H J Wilke; L Claes; H Schmitt; S Wolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Results of the AO spinal internal fixator in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  S Akalm; M Kiş; I T Benli; M Citak; E F Mumcu; M Tüzüner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical outcome after spinal fusion with a rigid versus a semi-rigid pedicle screw system.

Authors:  B Dahl; P Gehrchen; P Blyme; T Kiaer; E Tøndevold
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Risk factors associated with the halo phenomenon after lumbar fusion surgery and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Sul-Gee Kim; Hwan-Mo Lee; Hak-Sun Kim; Eun-Su Moon; Jin-Oh Park; Nam-Heon Seol; Seong-Hwan Moon
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-06-30

8.  Biomechanical comparison of different combinations of hook and screw in one spine motion unit--an experiment in porcine model.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Li-Huei Chen; De-Mei Lee; Mu-Yi Liu; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Trans-Endplate Pedicle Pillar System in Unstable Spinal Burst Fractures: Design, Technique, and Mechanical Evaluation.

Authors:  Chunfeng Zhao; Michio Hongo; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin D Zhao; Bradford L Currier; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.