Literature DB >> 26172362

Historical Evolution of Imaging Techniques for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism.

Milad Yazdani1, Charles T Lau1, Jason K Lempel1, Ruchi Yadav1, Ahmed H El-Sherief1, Joseph T Azok1, Rahul D Renapurkar1.   

Abstract

As we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), it seems fitting to look back at the major accomplishments of the radiology community in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Few diseases have so consistently captured the attention of the medical community. Since the first description of pulmonary embolism by Virchow in the 1850s, clinicians have struggled to reach a timely diagnosis of this common condition because of its nonspecific and often confusing clinical picture. As imaging tests started to gain importance in the 1900s, the approach to diagnosing pulmonary embolism also began to change. Rapid improvements in angiography, ventilation-perfusion imaging, and cross-sectional imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have constantly forced health care professionals to rethink how they diagnose pulmonary embolism. Needless to say, the way pulmonary embolism is diagnosed today is distinctly different from how it was diagnosed in Virchow's era; and imaging, particularly CT, now forms the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation. Currently, radiology offers a variety of tests that are fast and accurate and can provide anatomic and functional information, thus allowing early diagnosis and triage of cases. This review provides a historical journey into the evolution of these imaging tests and highlights some of the major breakthroughs achieved by the radiology community and RSNA in this process. Also highlighted are areas of ongoing research and development in this field of imaging as radiologists seek to combat some of the newer challenges faced by modern medicine, such as rising health care costs and radiation dose hazards. ©RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26172362     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  6 in total

1.  Multimodal indirect imaging signs of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Pedro Paulo Teixeira E Silva Torres; Alexandre Dias Mançano; Gláucia Zanetti; Bruno Hochhegger; Ana Caroline Vieira Aurione; Marcelo Fouad Rabahi; Edson Marchiori
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Prognostic value of CT pulmonary angiography parameters in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Diletta Cozzi; Chiara Moroni; Edoardo Cavigli; Alessandra Bindi; Cosimo Caviglioli; Peiman Nazerian; Simone Vanni; Vittorio Miele; Maurizio Bartolucci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: New Imaging Tools and Modalities.

Authors:  Farbod Nicholas Rahaghi; Jasleen Kaur Minhas; Gustavo A Heresi
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 4.  A review of imaging modalities in pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Mona Ascha; Rahul D Renapurkar; Adriano R Tonelli
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.219

Review 5.  [Noninfectious differential diagnoses of pneumonia].

Authors:  A Wielandner; P Agarwal; A Toelly; C Bardach
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Perfusion-only imaging in pregnant women: A comparative reader study with implications for practice patterns.

Authors:  Jennifer A Schroeder; Quy Cao; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Jennifer A Gillman; Thomas Anderson; Stamatoula Pilati; Jacob G Dubroff; Michael Farwell; Andrew Kozlov; Katrina Korhonen; Daniel A Pryma; Austin R Pantel
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.