Ashley D Harris1,2, Nicolaas A J Puts1,2, Richard A E Edden1,2. 1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. F. M. Kirby Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a tissue correction for GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) that appropriately addresses differences in voxel gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulations compared the performance of tissue correction approaches. Corrections were then applied to in vivo data from 16 healthy volunteers, acquired at 3T. GM, WM, and CSF fractions were determined from T1 -weighted images. Corrections for CSF content, GM/WM GABA content, and water relaxation of the three compartments are combined into a single, fully corrected measurement. RESULTS: Simulations show that CSF correction increases the dependence of GABA measurements on GM/WM fraction, by an amount equal to the fraction of CSF. Furthermore, GM correction substantially (and nonlinearly) increases the dependence of GABA measurements on GM/WM fraction, for example, by a factor of over four when the voxel GM tissue fraction is 50%. At this tissue fraction, GABA is overestimated by a factor of 1.5. For the in vivo data, correcting for voxel composition increased measured GABA values (P < 0.001 for all regions), but did not reduce intersubject variance (P > 0.5 for all regions). Corrected GABA values differ significantly based on the segmentation procedure used (P < 0.0001) and tissue parameter assumptions made (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We introduce a comprehensive tissue correction factor that adjusts GABA measurements to correct for different voxel compositions of GM, WM, and CSF.
PURPOSE: To develop a tissue correction for GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) that appropriately addresses differences in voxel gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulations compared the performance of tissue correction approaches. Corrections were then applied to in vivo data from 16 healthy volunteers, acquired at 3T. GM, WM, and CSF fractions were determined from T1 -weighted images. Corrections for CSF content, GM/WM GABA content, and water relaxation of the three compartments are combined into a single, fully corrected measurement. RESULTS: Simulations show that CSF correction increases the dependence of GABA measurements on GM/WM fraction, by an amount equal to the fraction of CSF. Furthermore, GM correction substantially (and nonlinearly) increases the dependence of GABA measurements on GM/WM fraction, for example, by a factor of over four when the voxel GM tissue fraction is 50%. At this tissue fraction, GABA is overestimated by a factor of 1.5. For the in vivo data, correcting for voxel composition increased measured GABA values (P < 0.001 for all regions), but did not reduce intersubject variance (P > 0.5 for all regions). Corrected GABA values differ significantly based on the segmentation procedure used (P < 0.0001) and tissue parameter assumptions made (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We introduce a comprehensive tissue correction factor that adjusts GABA measurements to correct for different voxel compositions of GM, WM, and CSF.
Authors: Ashley D Harris; Benjamin Glaubitz; Jamie Near; C John Evans; Nicolaas A J Puts; Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke; Martin Tegenthoff; Peter B Barker; Richard A E Edden Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Richard A E Edden; Nicolaas A J Puts; Ashley D Harris; Peter B Barker; C John Evans Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Paul G Mullins; David J McGonigle; Ruth L O'Gorman; Nicolaas A J Puts; Rishma Vidyasagar; C John Evans; Richard A E Edden Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mark Mikkelsen; Peter B Barker; Pallab K Bhattacharyya; Maiken K Brix; Pieter F Buur; Kim M Cecil; Kimberly L Chan; David Y-T Chen; Alexander R Craven; Koen Cuypers; Michael Dacko; Niall W Duncan; Ulrike Dydak; David A Edmondson; Gabriele Ende; Lars Ersland; Fei Gao; Ian Greenhouse; Ashley D Harris; Naying He; Stefanie Heba; Nigel Hoggard; Tun-Wei Hsu; Jacobus F A Jansen; Alayar Kangarlu; Thomas Lange; R Marc Lebel; Yan Li; Chien-Yuan E Lin; Jy-Kang Liou; Jiing-Feng Lirng; Feng Liu; Ruoyun Ma; Celine Maes; Marta Moreno-Ortega; Scott O Murray; Sean Noah; Ralph Noeske; Michael D Noseworthy; Georg Oeltzschner; James J Prisciandaro; Nicolaas A J Puts; Timothy P L Roberts; Markus Sack; Napapon Sailasuta; Muhammad G Saleh; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Nicholas Simard; Stephan P Swinnen; Martin Tegenthoff; Peter Truong; Guangbin Wang; Iain D Wilkinson; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Hongmin Xu; Fuhua Yan; Chencheng Zhang; Vadim Zipunnikov; Helge J Zöllner; Richard A E Edden Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Swaantje Casjens; Urike Dydak; Shalmali Dharmadhikari; Anne Lotz; Martin Lehnert; Clara Quetscher; Christoph Stewig; Benjamin Glaubitz; Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke; David Edmondson; Chien-Lin Yeh; Tobias Weiss; Christoph van Thriel; Lennard Herrmann; Siegfried Muhlack; Dirk Woitalla; Michael Aschner; Thomas Brüning; Beate Pesch Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Fei Gao; Xuntao Yin; Richard A E Edden; Alan C Evans; Junhai Xu; Guanmei Cao; Honghao Li; Muwei Li; Bin Zhao; Jian Wang; Guangbin Wang Journal: Hippocampus Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.899
Authors: Lize Hermans; Inge Leunissen; Lisa Pauwels; Koen Cuypers; Ronald Peeters; Nicolaas A J Puts; Richard A E Edden; Stephan P Swinnen Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Eric C Porges; Adam J Woods; Richard A E Edden; Nicolaas A J Puts; Ashley D Harris; Huaihou Chen; Amanda M Garcia; Talia R Seider; Damon G Lamb; John B Williamson; Ronald A Cohen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-01
Authors: Tamar Kolodny; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Jennifer Gerdts; Richard A E Edden; Raphael A Bernier; Scott O Murray Journal: Autism Res Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Kimberly L Chan; Muhammad G Saleh; Georg Oeltzschner; Peter B Barker; Richard A E Edden Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 6.556