Literature DB >> 26171578

The Recent Revolution in the Design and Manufacture of Cranial Implants: Modern Advancements and Future Directions.

David J Bonda1, Sunil Manjila, Warren R Selman, David Dean.   

Abstract

Large format (i.e., >25 cm) cranioplasty is a challenging procedure not only from a cosmesis standpoint, but also in terms of ensuring that the patient's brain will be well-protected from direct trauma. Until recently, when a patient's own cranial flap was unavailable, these goals were unattainable. Recent advances in implant computer-aided design and 3-dimensional (3-D) printing are leveraging other advances in regenerative medicine. It is now possible to 3-D-print patient-specific implants from a variety of polymer, ceramic, or metal components. A skull template may be used to design the external shape of an implant that will become well integrated in the skull, while also providing beneficial distribution of mechanical force in the event of trauma. Furthermore, an internal pore geometry can be utilized to facilitate the seeding of banked allograft cells. Implants may be cultured in a bioreactor along with recombinant growth factors to produce implants coated with bone progenitor cells and extracellular matrix that appear to the body as a graft, albeit a tissue-engineered graft. The growth factors would be left behind in the bioreactor and the graft would resorb as new host bone invades the space and is remodeled into strong bone. As we describe in this review, such advancements will lead to optimal replacement of cranial defects that are both patient-specific and regenerative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26171578      PMCID: PMC4615389          DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  91 in total

1.  Manufacturing of individual biodegradable bone substitute implants using selective laser melting technique.

Authors:  Markus Lindner; Simon Hoeges; Wilhelm Meiners; Konrad Wissenbach; Ralf Smeets; Rainer Telle; Reinhart Poprawe; Horst Fischer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Neomembranes: a concept review with special reference to self-reinforced polyglycolide membranes.

Authors:  N A Ashammakhi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996

3.  Titanium serum and urine levels in rabbits with a titanium implant in the absence of wear.

Authors:  P D Bianco; P Ducheyne; J M Cuckler
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Protein and mineral composition of osteogenic extracellular matrix constructs generated with a flow perfusion bioreactor.

Authors:  Richard A Thibault; Antonios G Mikos; F Kurtis Kasper
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 5.  Outcomes of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Brandon G Rocque; Kaushik Amancherla; Sean M Lew; Sandi Lam
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antibiotic diffusion from antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads.

Authors:  K Adams; L Couch; G Cierny; J Calhoun; J T Mader
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Absorbable polyglycolide devices in trauma and bone surgery.

Authors:  N Ashammakhi; P Rokkanen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Prospective study on cranioplasty with individual carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) implants produced by means of stereolithography.

Authors:  Gabriele Wurm; Berndt Tomancok; Kurt Holl; Johannes Trenkler
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2004-12

9.  Compressive and bone-bonding strength of hydroxyapatite thermal decomposition product implanted in the femur of rabbit as a bioactive ceramic bone cement.

Authors:  A Takahashi; T Koshino
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  The use of bioabsorbable osteofixation devices in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Hilkka Peltoniemi; Nureddin Ashammakhi; Risto Kontio; Timo Waris; Antero Salo; Christian Lindqvist; Klaus Grätz; Riitta Suuronen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2002-07
View more
  18 in total

1.  Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing.

Authors:  Murat Guvendiren; Joseph Molde; Rosane M D Soares; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-13

Review 2.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 3.  State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Valentina Siracusa; Giuseppe Maimone; Vincenzo Antonelli
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.329

4.  Evaluation of a self-fitting, shape memory polymer scaffold in a rabbit calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Michaela R Pfau; Felipe O Beltran; Lindsay N Woodard; Lauren K Dobson; Shelby B Gasson; Andrew B Robbins; Zachary T Lawson; W Brian Saunders; Michael R Moreno; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Considerations in computer-aided design for inlay cranioplasty: technical note.

Authors:  Erik Nout; Maurice Y Mommaerts
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-01-08

6.  A retrospective descriptive study of cranioplasty failure rates and contributing factors in novel 3D printed calcium phosphate implants compared to traditional materials.

Authors:  Michael Koller; Daniel Rafter; Gillian Shok; Sean Murphy; Sheena Kiaei; Uzma Samadani
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2020-06-17

7.  Beneficial osseointegration effect of hydroxyapatite coating on cranial implant - FEM investigation.

Authors:  Jakub Chamrad; Petr Marcián; Jan Cizek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Review of Cranioplasty after Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Yong Jun Cho; Suk Hyung Kang
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-30

Review 9.  Emergence of Three-Dimensional Printing Technology and Its Utility in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Akshay Gadia; Kunal Shah; Abhay Nene
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-04-16

10.  Use of an Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft to Address a Contour Deformity in the Temporal Fossa: A Novel Application.

Authors:  Raghav Gupta; Nicholas C Oleck; Nitesh V Patel; Ira Goldstein
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.