Literature DB >> 34571270

Evaluation of a self-fitting, shape memory polymer scaffold in a rabbit calvarial defect model.

Michaela R Pfau1, Felipe O Beltran2, Lindsay N Woodard1, Lauren K Dobson3, Shelby B Gasson3, Andrew B Robbins4, Zachary T Lawson1, W Brian Saunders3, Michael R Moreno5, Melissa A Grunlan6.   

Abstract

Self-fitting scaffolds prepared from biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone)-diacrylate (PCL-DA) have been developed for the treatment of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bone defects. As a thermoresponsive shape memory polymer (SMP), with the mere exposure to warm saline, these porous scaffolds achieve a conformal fit in defects. This behavior was expected to be advantageous to osseointegration and thus bone healing. Herein, for an initial assessment of their regenerative potential, a pilot in vivo study was performed using a rabbit calvarial defect model. Exogenous growth factors and cells were excluded from the scaffolds. Key scaffold material properties were confirmed to be maintained following gamma sterilization. To assess scaffold integration and neotissue infiltration along the defect perimeter, non-critically sized (d = 8 mm) bilateral calvarial defects were created in 12 New Zealand white rabbits. Bone formation was assessed at 4 and 16 weeks using histological analysis and micro-CT, comparing defects treated with an SMP scaffold (d = 9 mm x t = 1 or 2 mm) to untreated defects (i.e. defects able to heal without intervention). To further assess osseointegration, push-out tests were performed at 16 weeks and compared to defects treated with poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) discs (d = 8.5 mm x t = 2 mm). The results of this study confirmed that the SMP scaffolds were biocompatible and highly conducive to bone formation and ingrowth at the perimeter. Ultimately, this resulted in similar bone volume and surface area versus untreated defects and superior performance in push-out testing versus defects treated with PEEK discs. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Current treatments of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bone defects include biologic and synthetic grafts but they are limited in their ability to form good contact with adjacent tissue. A regenerative engineering approach using a biologic-free scaffold able to achieve conformal fitting represents a potential "off-the-shelf" surgical product to heal CMF bone defects. Having not yet been evaluated in vivo, this study provided the preliminary assessment of the bone healing potential of self-fitting PCL scaffolds using a rabbit calvarial defect model. The study was designed to assess scaffold biocompatibility as well as bone formation and ingrowth using histology, micro-CT, and biomechanical push-out tests. The favorable results provide a basis to pursue establishing self-fitting scaffolds as a treatment option for CMF defects.
Copyright © 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Calvarial defect; Rabbit; Shape memory polymer (SMP) scaffolds; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34571270      PMCID: PMC8742656          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  42 in total

Review 1.  Cranial bone defects: current and future strategies.

Authors:  Caroline Szpalski; Jason Barr; Meredith Wetterau; Pierre B Saadeh; Stephen M Warren
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for repair of craniofacial defects.

Authors:  Charalambos K Rammos; Cenk Cayci; Jose A Castro-Garcia; Iman Feiz-Erfan; Salvatore C Lettieri
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Andrea Moreira-Gonzalez; Ian T Jackson; Takeshi Miyawaki; Khaled Barakat; Vincent DiNick
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Epidemiology of facial fracture injuries.

Authors:  Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Veerajalandhar Allareddy; Romesh P Nalliah
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  PCL-PLLA Semi-IPN Shape Memory Polymers (SMPs): Degradation and Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Lindsay N Woodard; Vanessa M Page; Kevin T Kmetz; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  Macromol Rapid Commun       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.734

6.  The therapeutic effect of patient-specific implants in cranioplasty.

Authors:  Thomas Zegers; Mariel Ter Laak-Poort; David Koper; Bernd Lethaus; Peter Kessler
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Animal models for craniofacial reconstruction by stem/stromal cells.

Authors:  Na Liu; Xue Lyu; Huanhuan Fan; Jing Shi; Jing Hu; En Luo
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Biodegradable bone cement compositions based on acrylate and epoxide terminated poly(propylene fumarate) oligomers and calcium salt compositions.

Authors:  A J Domb; N Manor; O Elmalak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Failure of autologous bone-assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Gerald A Grant; Matthew Jolley; Richard G Ellenbogen; Theodore S Roberts; Joseph R Gruss; John D Loeser
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Methodology for performing biomechanical push-out tests for evaluating the osseointegration of calvarial defect repair in small animal models.

Authors:  Zachary T Lawson; Jiwan Han; W Brian Saunders; Melissa A Grunlan; Michael R Moreno; Andrew B Robbins
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2021-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.