Literature DB >> 23790219

Outcomes of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the pediatric population.

Brandon G Rocque1, Kaushik Amancherla, Sean M Lew, Sandi Lam.   

Abstract

Cranioplasty is routinely performed following decompressive craniectomy in both adult and pediatric populations. In adults, this procedure is associated with higher rates of complications than is elective cranial surgery. This study is a review of the literature describing risk factors for complications after cranioplasty surgery in pediatric patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases was undertaken. Articles were selected based on their titles and abstracts. Only studies that focused on a pediatric population were included; case reports were excluded. Studies in which the authors assessed bone flap storage method, timing of cranioplasty, material used (synthetic vs autogenous), skull defect size, and/or complication rates (bone resorption and surgical site infection) were selected for further analysis. Eleven studies that included a total of 441 cranioplasties performed in the pediatric population are included in this review. The findings are as follows: 1) Based on analysis of pooled data, using cryopreserved bone flaps during cranioplasty may lead to a higher rate of bone resorption and lower rate of infection than using bone flaps stored at room temperature. 2) In 3 of 4 articles describing the effect of time between craniectomy and cranioplasty on complication rate, the authors found no significant effect, while in 1 the authors found that the incidence of bone resorption was significantly lower in children who had undergone early cranioplasty. Pooling of data was not possible for this analysis. 3) There are insufficient data to assess the effect of cranioplasty material on complication rate when considering only cranioplasties performed to repair decompressive craniectomy defects. However, when considering cranioplasties performed for any indication, those in which freshly harvested autograft is used may have a lower rate of resorption than those in which stored autograft is used. 4) There is no appreciable effect of craniectomy defect size or patient age on complication rate. There is a paucity of articles describing outcomes and complications following cranioplasty in children and adolescents. However, based on the studies examined in this systematic review, there are reasons to suspect that method of flap preservation, timing of surgery, and material used may be significant. Larger prospective and retrospective studies are needed to shed more light on this important issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23790219     DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.PEDS12605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  20 in total

Review 1.  The Recent Revolution in the Design and Manufacture of Cranial Implants: Modern Advancements and Future Directions.

Authors:  David J Bonda; Sunil Manjila; Warren R Selman; David Dean
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Bioinspired Collagen Scaffolds in Cranial Bone Regeneration: From Bedside to Bench.

Authors:  Justine C Lee; Elizabeth J Volpicelli
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Suturing-Free Artificial Dura with Dacron Heart Patch in Decompressive Craniectomy and Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Yan Xue; Si-Shun Zhao; Ting-Jian Yang; Hao-Qing Song; Hong Liu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Decompressive craniectomy and CSF disorders in children.

Authors:  Marie Manfiotto; Carmine Mottolese; Alexandru Szathmari; Pierre-Aurelien Beuriat; Olivier Klein; Matthieu Vinchon; Edouard Gimbert; Thomas Roujeau; Didier Scavarda; Michel Zerah; Federico Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Problems of reconstructive cranioplasty after traumatic brain injury in children.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Luca Massimi; Simone Peraio; Massimo Caldarelli; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Vita M Klieverik; Kai J Miller; Kuo Sen Han; Ash Singhal; Michael Vassilyadi; Charles J Touchette; Alexander G Weil; Peter A Woerdeman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Laura Zaccaria; Sasha Job Tharakan; Stefan Altermatt
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Rescue Decompressive Craniectomy in Children with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Dimitrios Rallis; Panagiotis Poulos; Maria Kazantzi; Panagiotis Kalampalikis
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2017-06-19

Review 9.  Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients-a systematic review.

Authors:  Vita M Klieverik; Kai J Miller; Ash Singhal; Kuo Sen Han; Peter A Woerdeman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a retrospective evaluation of clinical outcome and osteointegration.

Authors:  Pietro Spennato; Valentina Canella; Ferdinado Aliberti; Carmela Russo; Claudio Ruggiero; Angelo Nataloni; Milena Lombardo; Giuseppe Cinalli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.