Literature DB >> 26170752

Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue.

Murat Çakır1, Tevfik Küçükkartallar1, Ahmet Tekin1, Nebil Selimoğlu2, Necdet Poyraz3, Mehmet Metin Belviranlı1, Adil Kartal1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mammography may have some limitations in the diagnosis and screening of breast cancer for women who have previously undergone breast reduction surgery. This study aimed to investigate how the structural defects in the breast tissue formed by postoperative changes are reflected on mammography.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The records of patients who had previously undergone breast reduction surgery and who were requested to undergo mammography for breast cancer screening by the general surgery clinic were retrospectively studied. The patients' ages, surgical procedures, postoperative follow-up periods, amount of removed material, and histopathological and mammographic results were studied. The patients were classified into 3 groups: those older than 40 years who underwent reduction mammoplasty targeting predominantly the glandular tissue (group 1), those younger than 40 years who underwent reduction mammoplasty targeting predominantly the fat tissue (group 2), and those older than 40 years who were diagnosed with breast hypertrophy and were not operated (group 3).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period of the patients was 6 (2-10) years. The mean value of resected tissue was 1120 g (680-2070) in group 1 and 1220 g (720-1980) in group 2. The mean age at the time of surgery was 45 (40-70) years for group 1 and 35 (24-40) years for group 2. All patients in group 1 were classified in Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 1-2; 28 patients in group 2 were classified in BI-RADS 1-2, 4 were classified in BI-RADS 3, and 8 were classified in BI-RADS 0. In group 3, 35 patients were classified in BI-RADS 1-2, 4 were classified in BI-RADS 3, and 1 was classified in BI-RADS 0.
CONCLUSION: We believe that breast reduction surgery targeting predominantly the glandular tissue in patients older than 40 years increases mammographic sensitivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammography; breast; cancer; reduction surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 26170752      PMCID: PMC4485814          DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2015.2929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg        ISSN: 1300-0705


  12 in total

1.  Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: mammograms and physical examinations.

Authors:  Y Shen; M Zelen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Reduction mammoplasty by the central pedicle, avoiding a vertical scar.

Authors:  N Savaci
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.

Authors:  S S Kaplan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Breast cancer following breast reduction surgery in Sweden.

Authors:  J D Boice; I Persson; L A Brinton; M Hober; J K McLaughlin; W J Blot; J F Fraumeni; O Nyrén
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Are risk factors for breast cancer associated with follow-up procedures in diverse women with abnormal mammography?

Authors:  Teresa C Juarbe; Celia Patricia Kaplan; Carol P Somkin; Rena Pasick; Ginny Gildengorin; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.

Authors:  Anne Helene Olsen; Olorunsola F Agbaje; Jonathan P Myles; Elsebeth Lynge; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Histologic profiles of breast reduction specimens.

Authors:  Sühan Ayhan; Yavuz Başterzi; Reha Yavuzer; Osman Latifoğlu; Seyhan Cenetoğlu; Kenan Atabay; M Cemalettin Celebi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 8.  Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Britt-Marie Ljung; Deborah Grady
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Evaluation of the postoperative breast.

Authors:  E B Mendelson
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  The evaluation of contralateral breast lesions in breast cancer patients using reduction mammoplasty.

Authors:  Lutfi Dogan; Mehmet Ali Gulcelik; Melda Bulut; Niyazi Karaman; Gamze Kiziltan; Cihangir Ozaslan
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.