Literature DB >> 1732922

Evaluation of the postoperative breast.

E B Mendelson1.   

Abstract

With widespread use of mammography for breast cancer screening, the number of surgical procedures has also increased. Overlapping with radiographic signs of malignancy, including masses, areas of asymmetric density and architectural distortion, microcalcifications, and skin thickening, postsurgical changes may make mammographic evaluation difficult. After tumor excision and irradiation where breast alterations are more profound and prolonged, the task of distinguishing recurrent tumor from scarring or fat necrosis is even more challenging. Mammograms after breast conservation therapy for carcinoma or after cosmetic surgery require correlation with physical findings and the surgical procedures that were performed. Responses of tissue to lumpectomy and radiation, such as breast edema and skin thickening, are most pronounced 6 to 12 months after treatment, gradually resolving within 1 to 3 years. Carefully tailored mammographic studies will promote the dual goal of early detection of local tumor recurrence and avoidance of misinterpreting postoperative and irradiation changes as malignancy. Sequential examinations should begin with a postoperative preradiation mammogram for residual carcinoma, particularly when microcalcifications have been present, followed by the baseline postradiation examination at 6 months with the next study 6 months later (1 year after initial treatment). Mammograms of the treated breast may be performed at intervals of 6 months until radiographic stability has been recognized. Annual studies thereafter are suggested. The contralateral, unaffected breast should be evaluated mammographically according to screening guidelines or clinical concerns. Mammograms performed after cosmetic and reconstructive procedures should be correlated with the surgical techniques and clinical history. Modified views for silicone implants can maximize visualization of breast parenchyma. Ultrasonography is a useful complement to mammography in demonstrating the origin of a palpable mass either within the implant or the breast parenchyma. In reduction mammoplasty, distorted architecture, parenchymal bands, tissue redistribution, and fat necrosis should be recognized. After mastectomy, myocutaneous reconstruction may be performed. Masses that develop within flap reconstructions most frequently represent fat necrosis, which, when calcifying oil cysts are seen, may have a characteristic radiographic appearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1732922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  12 in total

1.  Does accelerated hypofractionated adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy increase mammographic density or change mammographic features?

Authors:  Silvia Bagnera; Luisella Milanesio; Piero B Brachet Cota; Carla Berrino; Aldo Cataldi; Giovanni Gatti; Guido Mondini; Ovidio Paino; Erika G Comello; Renzo Orlassino; Massimo Pasquino; Domenico Cante; Maria R La Porta; Sebastiano Patania; Giovanni La Valle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue.

Authors:  Murat Çakır; Tevfik Küçükkartallar; Ahmet Tekin; Nebil Selimoğlu; Necdet Poyraz; Mehmet Metin Belviranlı; Adil Kartal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-06-01

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of oxidized regenerated cellulose in breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Michela Giuliani; Rossella Rella; Rita Fubelli; Federica Patrolecco; Silvia Eleonora Di Giovanni; Chiara Buccheri; Federico Padovano; Paolo Belli; Maurizio Romani; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Enida Bufi; Gianluca Franceschini; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Alan G Sechtin; Helga Marques; Zheng Zhang
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Scintimammography in conjunction with ultrasonography for local breast cancer recurrence in post-mastectomy breast.

Authors:  S Usmani; H Khan; N Ahmed; F Marafi; N Garvie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Cryosurgery for breast fibroadenomas.

Authors:  Lizhi Niu; Binghui Wu; Kecheng Xu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2012-08

7.  Comparison of Mammographic Changes Across Three Different Fractionation Schedules for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sibo Tian; Lina F Paster; Sinae Kim; Laurie Kirstein; Bruce G Haffty; Adam Ferro; Judith Amorosa; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A literature review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gisela Lg Menezes; Floor M Knuttel; Bertine L Stehouwer; Ruud M Pijnappel; Maurice Aaj van den Bosch
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10

Review 9.  Unilateral breast edema: spectrum of etiologies and imaging appearances.

Authors:  Jin Young Kwak; Eun Kyung Kim; Sun Yang Chung; Jai Kyung You; Ki Keun Oh; Yong Hee Lee; Tae Hee Kwon; Hae Kyoung Jung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Incidence and Outcome of Breast Biopsy Procedures During Follow-up After Treatment for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Raquel F D van la Parra; Kaiping Liao; Benjamin D Smith; Wei T Yang; Jessica W T Leung; Sharon H Giordano; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.