Literature DB >> 26168378

The Hungry Mind: Intellectual Curiosity Is the Third Pillar of Academic Performance.

Sophie von Stumm1, Benedikt Hell2, Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic3.   

Abstract

Over the past century, academic performance has become the gatekeeper to institutions of higher education, shaping career paths and individual life trajectories. Accordingly, much psychological research has focused on identifying predictors of academic performance, with intelligence and effort emerging as core determinants. In this article, we propose expanding on the traditional set of predictors by adding a third agency: intellectual curiosity. A series of path models based on a meta-analytically derived correlation matrix showed that (a) intelligence is the single most powerful predictor of academic performance; (b) the effects of intelligence on academic performance are not mediated by personality traits; (c) intelligence, Conscientiousness (as marker of effort), and Typical Intellectual Engagement (as marker of intellectual curiosity) are direct, correlated predictors of academic performance; and (d) the additive predictive effect of the personality traits of intellectual curiosity and effort rival that the influence of intelligence. Our results highlight that a "hungry mind" is a core determinant of individual differences in academic achievement. © Association for Psychological Science 2011.

Entities:  

Keywords:  academic performance; conscientiousness; intellectual curiosity; intelligence; meta-analysis

Year:  2011        PMID: 26168378     DOI: 10.1177/1745691611421204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  36 in total

1.  An Exploratory Assessment of Epistemic Curiosity in Students at Three Doctor of Pharmacy Programs.

Authors:  Daniel R Malcom; Jeff Cain; Emily K Frederick; Chris Johnson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  A comparative study of the impacts of unbalanced sample sizes on the four synthesized methods of meta-analytic structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Marzieh Alamolhoda; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Zahra Bagheri
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-09-06

Review 3.  Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Openness to Experience and Intellect Differentially Predict Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences.

Authors:  Scott Barry Kaufman; Lena C Quilty; Rachael G Grazioplene; Jacob B Hirsh; Jeremy R Gray; Jordan B Peterson; Colin G DeYoung
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2015-01-28

5.  Genetically-mediated associations between measures of childhood character and academic achievement.

Authors:  Elliot M Tucker-Drob; Daniel A Briley; Laura E Engelhardt; Frank D Mann; K Paige Harden
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 6.  Dopamine Does Double Duty in Motivating Cognitive Effort.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Achievement-Relevant Personality: Relations with the Big Five and Validation of an Efficient Instrument.

Authors:  Daniel A Briley; Matthew Domiteaux; Elliot M Tucker-Drob
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2014-05-01

8.  True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality.

Authors:  Kaili Rimfeld; Yulia Kovas; Philip S Dale; Robert Plomin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11

9.  The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence.

Authors:  Eva Krapohl; Kaili Rimfeld; Nicholas G Shakeshaft; Maciej Trzaskowski; Andrew McMillan; Jean-Baptiste Pingault; Kathryn Asbury; Nicole Harlaar; Yulia Kovas; Philip S Dale; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Cognitive ability and education: How behavioural genetic research has advanced our knowledge and understanding of their association.

Authors:  Margherita Malanchini; Kaili Rimfeld; Andrea G Allegrini; Stuart J Ritchie; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.