Literature DB >> 26168110

Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?

Matthew C Makel1, Jonathan A Plucker2, Boyd Hegarty3.   

Abstract

Recent controversies in psychology have spurred conversations about the nature and quality of psychological research. One topic receiving substantial attention is the role of replication in psychological science. Using the complete publication history of the 100 psychology journals with the highest 5-year impact factors, the current article provides an overview of replications in psychological research since 1900. This investigation revealed that roughly 1.6% of all psychology publications used the term replication in text. A more thorough analysis of 500 randomly selected articles revealed that only 68% of articles using the term replication were actual replications, resulting in an overall replication rate of 1.07%. Contrary to previous findings in other fields, this study found that the majority of replications in psychology journals reported similar findings to their original studies (i.e., they were successful replications). However, replications were significantly less likely to be successful when there was no overlap in authorship between the original and replicating articles. Moreover, despite numerous systemic biases, the rate at which replications are being published has increased in recent decades.
© The Author(s) 2012.

Keywords:  content analysis; replication; research methodology

Year:  2012        PMID: 26168110     DOI: 10.1177/1745691612460688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  76 in total

1.  Informativity renders a referent more accessible: Evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Hossein Karimi; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

3.  The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else is Known.

Authors:  Robert J Calin-Jageman; Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 8.710

4.  Optimization of cellular ELISA for assay of surface antigens on human synoviocytes.

Authors:  D D Smith; C B Cohick; H B Lindsley
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.993

5.  Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation.

Authors:  Denise C Gottfredson; Thomas D Cook; Frances E M Gardner; Deborah Gorman-Smith; George W Howe; Irwin N Sandler; Kathryn M Zafft
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-10

6.  Jumping to Conclusions About the Beads Task? A Meta-analysis of Delusional Ideation and Data-Gathering.

Authors:  Robert Malcolm Ross; Ryan McKay; Max Coltheart; Robyn Langdon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Investigating the effectiveness of working memory training in the context of Personality Systems Interaction theory.

Authors:  Tomáš Urbánek; Vladimír Marček
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-25

8.  Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help.

Authors:  Leonid Tiokhin; Minhua Yan; Thomas J H Morgan
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-01-28

9.  The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies.

Authors:  Justin E Karr; Corson N Areshenkoff; Philippe Rast; Scott M Hofer; Grant L Iverson; Mauricio A Garcia-Barrera
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy: efficacy and durability of CBT4CBT among cocaine-dependent individuals maintained on methadone.

Authors:  Kathleen M Carroll; Brian D Kiluk; Charla Nich; Melissa A Gordon; Galina A Portnoy; Daniel R Marino; Samuel A Ball
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 18.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.