Literature DB >> 26167689

Interspecific Phylogenic Relationships within Genus Melilotus Based on Nuclear and Chloroplast DNA.

Hongyan Di1, Zhen Duan1, Kai Luo1, Daiyu Zhang1, Fan Wu1, Jiyu Zhang1, Wenxian Liu1, Yanrong Wang1.   

Abstract

Melilotus comprises 19 species, while the phylogenetic relationships between species remain unclear. In the present work, three chloroplast genes, rbcL, matK, trnL-F, and one nuclear region, ITS (internal transcribed spacer) belonging to 48 populations of 18 species of Melilotus were sequenced and phylogenetic trees were constructed to study their interspecific relationships. Based on the phylogenetic tree generated in this study using rbcL analysis, the Melilotus genus is clearly monophyletic in the legume family. Both Bayesian and maximum-parsimony approaches were used to analyze the data. The nrDNA ITS provided more informative characteristics (9.8%) than cpDNA (3.0%). Melilotus contains two closely related groups, clade I and clade II. M. spicatus, M. indicus and M. segetalis have a close relationship. M. infestus, M. siculus and M. sulcatus are closely related. The comparing between molecular phylogeny and flower color classification in Melilotus showed that the flower color is not much informative for phylogenetics of this genus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26167689      PMCID: PMC4500581          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Melilotus (sweet clover) belongs to the tribe Trifolieae of the legume family and comprises 19 annual and biennial species [1]. All species are native to Eurasia or North Africa [2], and three species are cultivated: M. albus, M. officinalis and M. indicus [3]. M. albus and M. officinalis are mainly capable of self-pollination [4], but when the pistil is longer than the stamens, there is very little self-pollination [5]. Melilotus also has entomophilous flowers, which can lead to hybridization. Several species have invaded the Northwest Territories in Canada and the Midwestern USA, among which M. albus and M. officials are often studied [6, 7, 8]. Members of the Melilotus genus have high seed yields and, relative to most other forages, are more tolerant to extremes in environmental conditions, e.g. drought, cold and high salinity [9, 10]. Melilotus also has important medicinal value in addition to being an important forage crop [11]. Furthermore, the nitrogen fixation rate of Melilotus is higher than that of other legumes, making it beneficial for crop rotations [12]. Members of Melilotus exhibit wide variations in flower structure, flower color, seed, leaf and pod characteristics [13, 14]. The classification of Melilotus are more difficult based on morphological traits and growth habits [15, 16]. However, except for morphological studies, no other taxonomic assessments have been conducted on interspecific phylogenetic relationships among species. Analysis of DNA has been widely used in the phylogenetic and classification studies. These methods are more effective and specific than traditionally morphological methods in phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation involved in sibling species and morphologically intermediate species [17, 18]. Phylogenetic results that used a single gene may lead to misleading, especially in cpDNA, which is inherited maternally [19]. Hybridization between different species or genera may lead to reticulate evolution [20]. The employment of a different molecular marker could help to assess and to reduce this problem. Nuclear ribosomal genes with alternating gene and spacer regions and tandom repeat structures can provide this option [21, 22, 23]. The nrDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and chloroplast DNA have higher variability and are thus suitable for classifying lower taxonomic levels [24, 25, 26]. Accordingly, these regions are useful for inferring phylogenetic relationships at lower taxonomic levels and have been successfully used to analyze plant systematics [27, 28]. Here we selected three cpDNA termed the rbcL gene, matK gene and trnL-F gene and one nrDNA ITS to study the interspecific relationships [29, 30]. In this study, except for M. macrocarpus in Melilotus genus, plant samples from 48 populations of 18 Melilotus species were collected. To study the phylogenetic relationships among members of the Melilotus genus and to generate more accurate estimates of its genetic diversity, we constructed the molecular phylogenetic trees of single nrDNA ITS, 3-cpDNA and the concatenated sequences of all four genes. Finally the molecular phylogenetic classification was compared based on flower color and karyotype in Melilotus.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

Seeds from 48 populations representing 18 species were obtained from National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS, America) and planted at Yuzhong (35°57'N, 104°09'E) in Gansu Province, China (Table 1). Samples were collected from public land instead of protected areas in the northwest China, and no samples of endangered or protected species were included in our study.
Table 1

Information for 48 populations of 18 Melilotus species.

SpeciesPopulation numberOriginLatitudeLongitude
M. albus PI 90557China, Manchuria45°19'124°29'
Ames 21597Italy41°52'12°34'
M. altissimus Ames 18376United States, Nebraska41°29'-99°54'
PI 275975---
PI 420163France46°13'-2°12'
M. dentatus PI 108656Armenia40°4'-45°2'
PI 90753China35°51'-104°11'
M. elegans PI 250873Iran32°25'-53°41'
PI 260271Ethiopia, Shewa9°9'-37°48'
M. hirsutus Ames 22882Russian Federation61°31'105°19'
PI 129697Sweden60°7'-18°38'
M. indicus Ames 24055Egypt26°49'30°48'
PI 107562Uzbekistan41°22'64°35'
PI 260756Turkey38°57'35°14'
PI 43595---
Ames 21619United States, Nebraska41°29'-99°54'
PI 308524Peru-9°11'-75°0'
M. infestus PI 306327Italy41°52'12°34'
PI 306328Hungary47°9'19°30'
PI 306326Algeria27°13'2°29'
M. italicus PI 317638Israel31°2'34°51'
PI 317635Czechoslovakia14°28'121°2'
M. officinalis PI 304530Turkey38°57'-35°14'
M. polonicus PI 314386Former Soviet Union24°47'120°60'
PI 108647Former Soviet Union24°47'120°60'
M. segetalis PI 317633Algeria27°13'2°29'
PI 43597---
PI 317649Czechoslovakia14°28'121°2'
M. siculus PI 129703Malta35°56'14°22'
PI 318508Greece39°4'21°49'
PI 33366Former Soviet Union24°46'120°59'
M. speciosus PI 317650Canada, Manitoba53°45'-98°48'
M. spicatus PI 317644Algeria27°13'2°29'
Ames 25647Ukraine, Krym44°57'34°6'
Ames 18402United States, Nebraska41°29'-99°54'
PI 314466Uzbekistan41°22'64°35'
M. suaveolens Ames 18444United States, Nebraska41°29'-99°54'
Ames 23793Mongolia46°51'103°50'
PI 593408United States, South Dakota43°58'-99°54'
PI 595395United States, lowa41°52'-93°5'
M. sulcatus PI 198090Morocco31°47'-7°5'
PI 227595Tunisia33°53'-9°32'
M. tauricus PI 67510Ukraine, Krym44°57'34°6'
Ames 18446United States, Nebraska41°29'-99°54'
Ames 25789Ukraine, Krym44°57'34°6'
M. wolgicus PI 317665Denmark56°15'9°30'
PI 502547Russian Federation61°31'105°19'
PI 317666Czechoslovakia14°28'121°2'
Young leaves from 2 to 12 individuals of each population were sampled (totaling 406 individuals). Leaves were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

Four genes were amplified and sequenced: three chloroplast genes (cpDNA), trnL-F, rbcL and matK, and one nuclear region (nrDNA), ITS (Table 2). For each population, 2 to 12 independent DNA samples were obtained to check for sequencing errors. Total genomic DNA was extracted using an SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) method [31]. Polymerase chain reactions were then conducted in a 25-μL tube containing 1 μL genomic DNA (50 ng / mL), 1 μL of each primer (5 pmol / mL), 12.5 μL Takara Taq DNA polymerase master mix and 9.5 μL deionized water. For nuclear DNA ITS, the region was amplified using a PCR protocol of 94°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 50°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. For trnL-F gene using a PCR protocol of 94°C for 3 min, then 30 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 50°C for 45 s, extension at 72°C for 1min and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR temperature protocol of the matK gene was: 94°C for 3 min then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 58°C for 45 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Finally, for rbcL gene the following PCR conditions were used: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 36 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The sequencing reactions were performed by Shanghai Shenggong Biotechnological, Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Table 2

Sequences of primers used to amplify genes.

PrimerSequenceReference
ITS_F GGAAGKARAAGTCGTAACAAGG-
ITS_R RGTTTCTTTTCCTCCGCTTA-
rbcL_F AGACCTWTTTGAAGAAGGTTCWGT[48]
rbcL_R TCGGTYAGAGCRGGCATRTGCCA[48]
matK_F CCCRTYCATCTGGAA ATCTTGGTTC[49]
matK_R GCTRTRATAATGAGAAAGATTCTGC[49]
trnL-F_F CGAAATCGGTAGACGCTACG[50]
trnL-F_R ATTTGAACTGGTGACACGAG[50]
To analyze the phylogenetic relationship between Melilotus and other Legume forage and confirm the monophyly of genus Melilotus, we downloaded the only one available gene rbcL for most of legumes close to Melilotus from NCBI, including Medicago, Trifolium, Caragana, Lathyrus and Vicia. These rbcL sequences were used to construct a phylogenetic tree together with the sequences of 18 species of Melilotus obtained in the present study.

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic analyses were performed using Bayesian and maximum-parsimony approaches. Sequence alignment was initially performed using ClustalX [32] and manually adjusted using MEGA5.0 [33]. The maximum-parsimony analyses involved a heuristic search strategy with 1000 replicates of random sequence addition in combination with TBR branch swapping in MEGA5.0. All character states were treated as unordered and equally weighted. Informative insertions and deletions (indels) were coded as binary characters (0, 1) according to Graham et al. (2000). A strict consensus tree was constructed from the most parsimonious trees. Bayesian analyses were conducted using MrBayes version 3.1 [34]. A model of sequence evolution for the combined dataset was selected using the program ModelTest version 3.6 [35] as implemented in MrMTgui [36] and based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) [37]. The dataset was analyzed as a single partition using the GTR + I + G model. Four chains were run, beginning with a random tree and saving a tree every 100 generations for one million generations. Finally, the ITS region, three cpDNAs and the dataset of the four genes ITS, rbcL, matK and trnL-F were combined for phylogenetic analyses. One sequence from each population was used to construct phylogenetic trees for the genus Melilotus.

Results

Alignments and DNA sequence data

A total of 96 haplotypes were identified for the ITS region, and 31, 83 and 106 haplotypes were identified for the rbcL, matK, and trnL-F genes, respectively. One sequence from each population was used for constructing phylogenetic trees. Accession numbers of rbcL, matK, trnL-F and ITS respectively are KP987625—KP987627, KP987673—KP987720, KP987577—KP987624 and KP987721—KP987768. The 755-bp fragment of the rbcL gene yielded the most parsimonious trees (length = 138 steps; CI = 0.667; RI = 0.928). The nrDNA tree was based on an alignment of 714 bp (length = 159 steps; CI = 0.765; RI = 0.929). The combined dataset of 3 cpDNAs comprised 2284 bp (length = 241 steps; CI = 0.838; RI = 0.916) and the 4-gene dataset 2998 bp, with maximum-parsimony analyses resulting in the most parsimonious trees (length = 252 steps; CI = 0.625; RI = 0.852). The aligned sequence information for the phylogenetic analysis is presented in Table 3.
Table 3

Dataset and tree statistics from separate maximum parsimony analyses.

SequenceNumber of sequencesAligned Length/bpConserved site/bpVariable site /bpSingleton site/bpParsimony informative /bpParsimony informative site/%(G+C) Content /%
rbcL 427556668827618.140.8
nrDNA 4871457211142699.849.0
3—cpDNA 482284205811729883.035.0
4-genes 4829982611236731635.438.4

rbcL analysis in the legume family

The phylogenetic tree in the legume family shown in Fig 1 comprised two large clades, designated A and B. In phylogenetic tree, all the Melilotus species formed a monophyletic clade with a high bootstrap value of 100. Among them, the Melilotus was divided into two subclades, named clade I and clade II, with bootstrap values of 65 and 50, respectively. In clade II, M. siculus and M. sulcatus formed one subgroup, named clade IIa, and M. indicus and M. Segetalis formed another subgroup, named clade IIb. These Melilotus species clustering within the same subclade may have closer genetic relationships. All species of genera Medicago and Trifolium formed a clade named clade III which cluster together with genera Melilotus and can be used as outgroups in phylogenetic studies of Melilotus. All species of genera Caragana, Lathyrus and Vicia formed a big clade named clade IV, with members of Lathyrus and Vicia forming a subclade.
Fig 1

Topology resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of rbcL in the legume family dataset using MEGA5.0.

Bootstrap support values (> 50%) are indicated above the branches (posterior values from the corresponding Bayesian analysis are provided below the branches;-: node not recognized).

Topology resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of rbcL in the legume family dataset using MEGA5.0.

Bootstrap support values (> 50%) are indicated above the branches (posterior values from the corresponding Bayesian analysis are provided below the branches;-: node not recognized).

3-cpDNA analysis

The 3-cpDNA tree of Melilotus based on 2284-bp of concatenated plastid sequences (rbcL, matK and trnL-F), with T. lupinaste and M. sativa as outgroups, is shown in Fig 2. Similar to the rbcL tree for the legume family (Fig 1), the 3-cpDNA tree showed that Melilotus species can also be divided into two clades, clade I and clade II, though with low bootstrap support. In clade II, M. spicatus, M. indicus and M. segetalis formed a subclade named clade 1, which was supported by a high bootstrap value of 85; M. infestus, M. siculus and M. sulcatus formed clade 2, with low bootstrap values of 54. Compared with the results of the rbcL tree for the legume family, subgroup IIb was found in clade 1.
Fig 2

Topology resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of the combined dataset of 3-cpDNA genes (rbcL, matK, trnL-F) using MEGA5.0.

Bootstrap support values (> 50%) are indicated above the branches (posterior values from the corresponding Bayesian analysis are provided below the branches;-: node not recognized). The populations of the same species clustering together are indicated in a grey box. Except for clade 1 and clade 2, the definitions of clades follow those of Fig 1.

Topology resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of the combined dataset of 3-cpDNA genes (rbcL, matK, trnL-F) using MEGA5.0.

Bootstrap support values (> 50%) are indicated above the branches (posterior values from the corresponding Bayesian analysis are provided below the branches;-: node not recognized). The populations of the same species clustering together are indicated in a grey box. Except for clade 1 and clade 2, the definitions of clades follow those of Fig 1.

nrDNA analysis

The ITS-based phylogenetic tree of Melilotus based on the 714-bp alignment is shown in Fig 3, with T. lupinaste and M. sativa as outgroups. Two strongly divergent and highly supported clades with bootstrap values of 84 and 76, respectively, are shown in the ITS tree. In contrast to the results in Fig 2, clade A consists of two subclades, clade I and clade 1, with high bootstrap values of 91 and 88. Within clade 1, M. indicus and M. segetalis form a well-supported subgroup named IIb. As shown in Fig 3, subgroup IIa is evidently within clade 2, and subgroup IIa includes two species, M. sulcatus and M. siculus, with high bootstrap support.
Fig 3

Topology resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of one ITS dataset using MEGA 5.0.

Bootstrap support values (> 50%) are indicated above the branches (posterior values from the corresponding Bayesian analysis are provided below the branches;-: node not recognized). The populations of the same species clustering together are indicated in a grey box. The definitions of clades follow those of Fig 1 and Fig 2.

Topology resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of one ITS dataset using MEGA 5.0.

Bootstrap support values (> 50%) are indicated above the branches (posterior values from the corresponding Bayesian analysis are provided below the branches;-: node not recognized). The populations of the same species clustering together are indicated in a grey box. The definitions of clades follow those of Fig 1 and Fig 2.

4-gene analysis

The 4-gene tree of Melilotus yielded 2998 bp of four concatenated genes (rbcL, matK, trnL-F and ITS), with T. lupinaste and M. sativa as outgroups, is shown in Fig 4. The major clades recovered in the above tree were also successfully resolved by this analysis. Clade I was observed and contained 10 related species. Subgroup IIa and M. infestus formed a subclade, namely clade 2, and subgroup IIb with M. spicatus formed a highly supported subclade, clade 1. However, clade 2 clustered together with clade I, which is the major difference between this tree and the nrDNA tree. Except for populations of M. polonicus, M. spicatus and M. segetalis, other populations of the same species formed a subclade in the 4-gene tree.
Fig 4

Topology resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of one 4-gene dataset using MEGA5.0.

Bootstrap support values (> 50%) are indicated above the branches (posterior values from the corresponding Bayesian analysis are provided below the branches;-: node not recognized). The populations of the same species clustering together are indicated in a grey box. The definitions of clades follow those of Fig 1 and Fig 2.

Topology resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of one 4-gene dataset using MEGA5.0.

Bootstrap support values (> 50%) are indicated above the branches (posterior values from the corresponding Bayesian analysis are provided below the branches;-: node not recognized). The populations of the same species clustering together are indicated in a grey box. The definitions of clades follow those of Fig 1 and Fig 2.

Discussion

In this study, clade I, which contains 10 species, was found in all four trees of ITS and cpDNA genes. However, in the two cpDNA trees (Fig 1 and Fig 2), the 8 species formed another large clade, clade II. In the nrDNA tree (Fig 3) and 4-gene tree (Fig 4), clade 1, which was clustered into clade II in other two trees, was clustered into clade I; therefore, no clade II was shown. Several species are closely related in 3-cpDNA tree, nrDNA tree and 4-gene tree, e.g., M. spicatus, M. segetalis and M. indicus in clade 1, and M. siculus, M. sulcatus and M. infestus in clade 2. As shown in Table 3, the ITS region provided more informative characteristics (9.8%) than cpDNA (3.0%). Liu et al. [38] reported a similar result for Ligularia–Cremanthodium–Parasenecio in a study showing that ITS (39.6%) had more parsimony-informative characters than cpDNA (2.5%) using an NdhF and trnL-trnF combination. The higher sequence variability in the ITS region compared with cpDNA, which has also been demonstrated in many other taxa [39, 40, 41, 42] may lead to incongruence in phylogenetic tree. As nrDNA is biparentally inherited and has high rates of intraspecific gene flow which can enhance species delimitation. Howevre, the maternally inherited chloroplast DNA is more frequently introgressed and more limited use in species delimitation than nuclear DNA [43, 44]. In addition, incomplete lineage sorting [45] and hybridization between and within species [20] may also cause phylogeny incongruent. According to Steven [16], plant morphology may show great variation within a single plant, which was not used for species classification. Steven studied agronomic and taxonomic reviews of the genus Melilotus and divided Melilotus into two groups according to flower color, namely, white and yellow. The white group contains four species, M. albus, M. tauricus, M. wolgicus and M. speciosus, and the other species compose the yellow group (Table 4). Our results showed that flower color has no obvious link with the phylogenetic classification in our study.
Table 4

The four classifications of flower color, seed morphology, karyotype and molecular phylogeny in Melilotus.

CategoriesClassificationSubclassificationSpecies
Flower color[11] white M. albus, M. tauricus, M. wolgicus, M. speciosus
yellow M. altissimus, M. dentatus, M. hirsatus, M. officinalis, M. polonicus, M. suaveolens, M. elegans, M. spicatus , M. indicus, M. segetalis, M. infestus, M. siculus , M. sulcatus, M. italicus
Karyotype[39, 40] Type A M. albus, M. altissimus, M. dentatus, M. hirsutus, M. officinalis, M. polonicus, M. suaveolens, M. tauricus, M. wolgicus
Type BB-1 M. elegans, M. indicus, M. neapolitana
B-2 M. infestus, M. macrocarpus, M. messanensis , M. segetalis, M. speciosus, M. sulcatus
Type C M. italicus
Molecular phylogeny Clade M. albus, M. altissimus, M. dentatus, M. hirsatus, M. officinalis, M. polonicus, M. suaveolens, M. tauricus, M. wolgicus, M. elegans
Clade Clade 1 M. spicatus
Ⅱb M. indicus, M. segetalis
Clade 2 M. infestus
Ⅱa M. siculus , M. sulcatus
M. speciosus, M. italicus

: Species incongruence in flower color, karyotype and molecular phylogeny

: Species incongruence in flower color, karyotype and molecular phylogeny Clarke studied the number and morphology of chromosomes in the genus Melilotus [46], reporting a chromosome number of 2n = 16. Karyotype analyses of all Melilotus species were conducted by Kita [47]. The 19 species examined are grouped into three types: A, B and C. Type B is further divided into Type B-1 and Type B-2 (Table 4). The grouping information based on karyotype analyses indicates that the species within each type are closely related [47]. Except for M. elegans, clade 1 of the phylogenetic trees is consistent with type A, and clade 2 comprises all Type B and Type C species. The molecular phylogeny classification in our study well support the karyotype classification. The better consistency between molecular phylogenetic and karyotype indicate that karyotype may be the significant phylogenetic signal in the Melilotus genus. However, the phylogeography of Melilotus species and populations which rely on their distributions around the world remains largely unknown. Genetic diversity analysis within Melilotus genus is on going in our group with SSR markers, which will also provide a supplement conclusion of the interspecific relationship.
  24 in total

1.  The complete external transcribed spacer of 18S-26S rDNA: amplification and phylogenetic utility at low taxonomic levels in asteraceae and closely allied families.

Authors:  C R Linder; L R Goertzen; B V Heuvel; J Francisco-Ortega; R K Jansen
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Radiation and diversification within the Ligularia-Cremanthodium-Parasenecio complex (Asteraceae) triggered by uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Jian-Quan Liu; Yu-Jing Wang; Ai-Lan Wang; Ohba Hideaki; Richard J Abbott
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Intragenomic variation in the ITS rDNA region obscures phylogenetic relationships and inflates estimates of operational taxonomic units in genus Laetiporus.

Authors:  Daniel L Lindner; Mark T Banik
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Ainsliaea (Asteraceae) in the Sino-Japanese region based on nuclear rDNA and plastid DNA sequence data.

Authors:  Yuki Mitsui; Shao-Tien Chen; Zhe-Kun Zhou; Ching-I Peng; Yun-Fei Deng; Hiroaki Setoguchi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  D M Hillis; M T Dixon
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 6.  Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent.

Authors:  James H Degnan; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Molecular phylogeny of the Caryophyllaceae (Caryophyllales) inferred from chloroplast matK and nuclear rDNA ITS sequences.

Authors:  Simone Fior; Per Ola Karis; Gabriele Casazza; Luigi Minuto; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  A molecular phylogeny of the vataireoid legumes underscores floral evolvability that is general to many early-branching papilionoid lineages.

Authors:  Domingos Cardoso; Luciano Paganucci de Queiroz; Haroldo Cavalcante de Lima; Elisa Suganuma; Cássio van den Berg; Matt Lavin
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  A set of 100 chloroplast DNA primer pairs to study population genetics and phylogeny in monocotyledons.

Authors:  Nora Scarcelli; Adeline Barnaud; Wolf Eiserhardt; Urs A Treier; Marie Seveno; Amélie d'Anfray; Yves Vigouroux; Jean-Christophe Pintaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Expression of Concern: Potential DNA barcodes for Melilotus species based on five single loci and their combinations.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Genome-wide development and application of miRNA-SSR markers in Melilotus genus.

Authors:  Gisele Kanzana; Jean Musaza; Fan Wu; Zifeng Ouyang; Yimeng Wang; Tiantian Ma; Bakhit Ishag Rahama Akoy; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2021-10-09

3.  Genome-Wide Identification and Development of LTR Retrotransposon-Based Molecular Markers for the Melilotus Genus.

Authors:  Zifeng Ouyang; Yimeng Wang; Tiantian Ma; Gisele Kanzana; Fan Wu; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  Character-based DNA barcoding for authentication and conservation of IUCN Red listed threatened species of genus Decalepis (Apocynaceae).

Authors:  Priyanka Mishra; Amit Kumar; Gokul Sivaraman; Ashutosh K Shukla; Ravikumar Kaliamoorthy; Adrian Slater; Sundaresan Velusamy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Potential DNA barcodes for Melilotus species based on five single loci and their combinations.

Authors:  Fan Wu; Jinxing Ma; Yuqin Meng; Daiyu Zhang; Blaise Pascal Muvunyi; Kai Luo; Hongyan Di; Wenli Guo; Yanrong Wang; Baochang Feng; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genetic variation and diversity in 199 Melilotus accessions based on a combination of 5 DNA sequences.

Authors:  Hongxiang Zhang; Fan Wu; Wenli Guo; Rong Bai; Zhuanzhuan Yan; Blaise Pascal Muvunyi; Qi Yan; Yufei Zhang; Xianfeng Yi; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Analysis of miRNAs and their target genes in five Melilotus albus NILs with different coumarin content.

Authors:  Fan Wu; Kai Luo; Zhuanzhuan Yan; Daiyu Zhang; Qi Yan; Yufei Zhang; Xianfeng Yi; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Genotypic Variation in a Breeding Population of Yellow Sweet Clover (Melilotus officinalis).

Authors:  Kai Luo; M Z Z Jahufer; Fan Wu; Hongyan Di; Daiyu Zhang; Xuanchen Meng; Jiyu Zhang; Yanrong Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Cross-species transferability of EST-SSR markers developed from the transcriptome of Melilotus and their application to population genetics research.

Authors:  Zhuanzhuan Yan; Fan Wu; Kai Luo; Yufeng Zhao; Qi Yan; Yufei Zhang; Yanrong Wang; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Transcriptomic profiling of Melilotus albus near-isogenic lines contrasting for coumarin content.

Authors:  Kai Luo; Fan Wu; Daiyu Zhang; Rui Dong; Zhichao Fan; Rui Zhang; Zhuanzhuan Yan; Yanrong Wang; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.