Literature DB >> 21289107

Intragenomic variation in the ITS rDNA region obscures phylogenetic relationships and inflates estimates of operational taxonomic units in genus Laetiporus.

Daniel L Lindner1, Mark T Banik.   

Abstract

Regions of rDNA are commonly used to infer phylogenetic relationships among fungal species and as DNA barcodes for identification. These regions occur in large tandem arrays, and concerted evolution is believed to reduce intragenomic variation among copies within these arrays, although some variation still might exist. Phylogenetic studies typically use consensus sequencing, which effectively conceals most intragenomic variation, but cloned sequences containing intragenomic variation are becoming prevalent in DNA databases. To understand effects of using cloned rDNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses we amplified and cloned the ITS region from pure cultures of six Laetiporus species and one Wolfiporia species (Basidiomycota, Polyporales). An average of 66 clones were selected randomly and sequenced from 21 cultures, producing a total of 1399 interpretable sequences. Significant variation (≥ 5% variation in sequence similarity) was observed among ITS copies within six cultures from three species clades (L. cincinnatus, L. sp. clade J, and Wolfiporia dilatohypha) and phylogenetic analyses with the cloned sequences produced different trees relative to analyses with consensus sequences. Cloned sequences from L. cincinnatus fell into more than one species clade and numerous cloned L. cincinnatus sequences fell into entirely new clades, which if analyzed on their own most likely would be recognized as "undescribed" or "novel" taxa. The use of a 95% cut off for defining operational taxonomic units (OTUs) produced seven Laetiporus OTUs with consensus ITS sequences and 20 OTUs with cloned ITS sequences. The use of cloned rDNA sequences might be problematic in fungal phylogenetic analyses, as well as in fungal bar-coding initiatives and efforts to detect fungal pathogens in environmental samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21289107     DOI: 10.3852/10-331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycologia        ISSN: 0027-5514            Impact factor:   2.696


  51 in total

1.  Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi.

Authors:  Conrad L Schoch; Keith A Seifert; Sabine Huhndorf; Vincent Robert; John L Spouge; C André Levesque; Wen Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA barcoding in Mucorales: an inventory of biodiversity.

Authors:  G Walther; J Pawłowska; A Alastruey-Izquierdo; M Wrzosek; J L Rodriguez-Tudela; S Dolatabadi; A Chakrabarti; G S de Hoog
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 11.051

3.  Multiple ITS haplotypes in the genome of the lichenized basidiomycete Cora inversa (Hygrophoraceae): fact or artifact?

Authors:  Robert Lücking; James D Lawrey; Patrick M Gillevet; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Manuela Dal-Forno; Simon A Berger
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Community Analyses Uncover High Diversity of Lichenicolous Fungi in Alpine Habitats.

Authors:  Antonia Fleischhacker; Martin Grube; Theodora Kopun; Josef Hafellner; Lucia Muggia
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Plant Identity Influences Foliar Fungal Symbionts More Than Elevation in the Colorado Rocky Mountains.

Authors:  Stephanie N Kivlin; Melanie R Kazenel; Joshua S Lynn; D Lee Taylor; Jennifer A Rudgers
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  A single macrolichen constitutes hundreds of unrecognized species.

Authors:  Robert Lücking; Manuela Dal-Forno; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Patrick M Gillevet; Frank Bungartz; Bibiana Moncada; Alba Yánez-Ayabaca; José Luis Chaves; Luis Fernando Coca; James D Lawrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluating High-Throughput Sequencing Data of Microalgae Living in Melting Snow: Improvements and Limitations1.

Authors:  Stefanie Lutz; Lenka Procházková; Liane G Benning; Linda Nedbalová; Daniel Remias
Journal:  Fottea (Praha)       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.242

8.  Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?

Authors:  Robert Lücking; M Catherine Aime; Barbara Robbertse; Andrew N Miller; Hiran A Ariyawansa; Takayuki Aoki; Gianluigi Cardinali; Pedro W Crous; Irina S Druzhinina; David M Geiser; David L Hawksworth; Kevin D Hyde; Laszlo Irinyi; Rajesh Jeewon; Peter R Johnston; Paul M Kirk; Elaine Malosso; Tom W May; Wieland Meyer; Maarja Öpik; Vincent Robert; Marc Stadler; Marco Thines; Duong Vu; Andrey M Yurkov; Ning Zhang; Conrad L Schoch
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.515

9.  Broadscale specificity in a bark beetle-fungal symbiosis: a spatio-temporal analysis of the mycangial fungi of the western pine beetle.

Authors:  Ryan R Bracewell; Diana L Six
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  DNA Barcoding Mushroom Spawn Using EF-1α Barcodes: A Case Study in Oyster Mushrooms (Pleurotus).

Authors:  Peng Zhao; Sen-Peng Ji; Xian-Hao Cheng; Tolgor Bau; Hong-Xin Dong; Xing-Xi Gao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.