Literature DB >> 26166718

The Genomic Heterogeneity of FIGO Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinoma Impacts Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility.

Yaser R Hussein1, Russell Broaddus, Britta Weigelt, Douglas A Levine, Robert A Soslow.   

Abstract

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identified 4 groups of endometrial carcinomas based on an integrated genomic characterization: POLE ultramutated (POLE), microsatellite instability-high, copy number-low (CN-L), and copy number-high (CN-H). In that study, CN-H comprised all of the serous carcinoma cases and 25% of all International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma cases. In this study, 2 expert gynecologic pathologists undertook a morphologic reassessment of the FIGO Grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma subset of the TCGA study cohort, including an analysis for evidence of serous differentiation. Interobserver variability κvalues are reported for the histologic evaluation of all 4 genomic clusters, and diagnostic discrepancies are discussed. Overall, there were 55 agreements, 6 disagreements, and 14 deferrals. Of the 75 cases analyzed, 6 cases had a consensus morphologic diagnosis of serous carcinoma, but only 2 of these cases had a serous carcinoma genotype, whereas the remaining 4 cases were genotypically endometrioid carcinoma. For the CN-H group, 2 of 15 cases were serous carcinoma by morphology and genotype, whereas at least 1 pathologist interpreted the remaining 13 cases as endometrioid carcinoma. The interobserver agreement rate was highest in the CN-L group (90%; κ=0.9), compared with the other genomic groups (POLE: 62%, κ=0.55; microsatellite instability-high: 78%, κ=0.74; and CN-H: 53%, κ=0.48). Our review confirms that most high-grade endometrial carcinomas diagnosed by TCGA as FIGO Grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma are indeed endometrioid carcinomas by morphology and genotype, and that the reproducibility of histologic diagnosis between pathologists varies between the TCGA-integrated genomic clusters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26166718      PMCID: PMC4934379          DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  27 in total

1.  Poor interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  C Blake Gilks; Esther Oliva; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Histotype-genotype correlation in 36 high-grade endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Lien N Hoang; Melissa K McConechy; Martin Köbel; Guangming Han; Marjan Rouzbahman; Ben Davidson; Julie Irving; Rola H Ali; Sam Leung; Jessica N McAlpine; Esther Oliva; Marisa R Nucci; Robert A Soslow; David G Huntsman; C Blake Gilks; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Subtype-specific mutation of PPP2R1A in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Melissa K McConechy; Michael S Anglesio; Steve E Kalloger; Winnie Yang; Janine Senz; Christine Chow; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Gregg B Morin; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Mark S Carey; Jessica N McAlpine; Janice S Kwon; Leah M Prentice; Niki Boyd; Sohrab P Shah; C Blake Gilks; David G Huntsman
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  Somatic mutations of PPP2R1A in ovarian and uterine carcinomas.

Authors:  Ie-Ming Shih; Pradeep K Panuganti; Kuan-Tin Kuo; Tsui-Lien Mao; Elisabetta Kuhn; Sian Jones; Victor E Velculescu; Robert J Kurman; Tian-Li Wang
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Molecular pathology of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xavier Matias-Guiu; Jaime Prat
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Molecular profiling of endometrial malignancies.

Authors:  Norasate Samarnthai; Kevin Hall; I-Tien Yeh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-03-28

7.  Utility of immunohistochemistry in predicting microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ippolito Modica; Robert A Soslow; Destin Black; Carmen Tornos; Noah Kauff; Jinru Shia
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Routinely assessed morphological features correlate with microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jinru Shia; Destin Black; Amanda J Hummer; Jeff Boyd; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (pure and mixed type) compared with moderately and poorly differentiated endometrioid carcinoma. A clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  R Halperin; S Zehavi; R Langer; E Hadas; I Bukovsky; D Schneider
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.196

10.  Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers.

Authors:  C A Hamilton; M K Cheung; K Osann; L Chen; N N Teng; T A Longacre; M A Powell; M R Hendrickson; D S Kapp; J K Chan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Molecular-based classification algorithm for endometrial carcinoma categorizes ovarian endometrioid carcinoma into prognostically significant groups.

Authors:  Carlos Parra-Herran; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Bin Xu; Sam Khalouei; Dina Bassiouny; Matthew Cesari; Nadia Ismiil; Sharon Nofech-Mozes
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Synuclein-γ in uterine serous carcinoma impacts survival: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Abigail D Winder; Kruti P Maniar; Jian-Jun Wei; Dachao Liu; Denise M Scholtens; John R Lurain; Julian C Schink; Barbara M Buttin; Virginia L Filiaci; Heather A Lankes; Nilsa C Ramirez; Kay Park; Meenakshi Singh; Richard W Lieberman; Robert S Mannel; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Cara A Mathews; Michael L Pearl; Angeles Alvarez Secord; David J Peace; David G Mutch; William T Creasman; J Julie Kim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Molecular Classification of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers Identifies Distinct Prognostic Subgroups.

Authors:  Tjalling Bosse; Remi A Nout; Jessica N McAlpine; Melissa K McConechy; Heidi Britton; Yaser R Hussein; Carlene Gonzalez; Raji Ganesan; Jane C Steele; Beth T Harrison; Esther Oliva; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Douglas A Levine; C Blake Gilks; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Uterine High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sumi Thomas; Yaser Hussein; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Michele Cote; Oudai Hassan; Eman Abdulfatah; Baraa Alosh; Hui Guan; Robert A Soslow; Rouba Ali-Fehmi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  TP53 Mutational Spectrum in Endometrioid and Serous Endometrial Cancers.

Authors:  Anne M Schultheis; Luciano G Martelotto; Maria R De Filippo; Salvatore Piscuglio; Charlotte K Y Ng; Yaser R Hussein; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Robert A Soslow; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.762

6.  Clinicopathologic and Genomic Analysis of TP53-Mutated Endometrial Carcinomas.

Authors:  Lora H Ellenson; Britta Weigelt; Robert A Soslow; Amir Momeni-Boroujeni; Wissam Dahoud; Chad M Vanderbilt; Sarah Chiang; Rajmohan Murali; Eric V Rios-Doria; Kaled M Alektiar; Carol Aghajanian; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  A "Null" Pattern of p16 Immunostaining in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma: An Under-recognized and Important Aberrant Staining Pattern.

Authors:  Daniel R Matson; Molly A Accola; Les Henderson; Xiangqiang Shao; Leah Frater-Rubsam; Vanessa L Horner; William M Rehrauer; Paul Weisman; Jin Xu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 8.  New classification of endometrial cancers: the development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care.

Authors:  A Talhouk; J N McAlpine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2016-12-13

9.  Endometrial Tumor Classification by Histomorphology and Biomarkers in the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Jaclyn C Watkins; Michael J Downing; Marta Crous-Bou; Evan L Busch; Maxine Chen; Immaculata De Vivo; George L Mutter
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-12

10.  Comparative transcriptome analysis between patient and endometrial cancer cell lines to determine common signaling pathways and markers linked to cancer progression.

Authors:  Madelaine J Cho-Clark; Gauthaman Sukumar; Newton Medeiros Vidal; Sorana Raiciulescu; Mario G Oyola; Cara Olsen; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez; Clifton L Dalgard; T John Wu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2021-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.