Literature DB >> 24076778

Histotype-genotype correlation in 36 high-grade endometrial carcinomas.

Lien N Hoang1, Melissa K McConechy, Martin Köbel, Guangming Han, Marjan Rouzbahman, Ben Davidson, Julie Irving, Rola H Ali, Sam Leung, Jessica N McAlpine, Esther Oliva, Marisa R Nucci, Robert A Soslow, David G Huntsman, C Blake Gilks, Cheng-Han Lee.   

Abstract

Endometrioid, serous, and clear cell carcinomas are the major types of endometrial carcinoma. Histologic distinction between these different tumor types can be difficult in high-grade cases, in which significant interobserver diagnostic disagreement exists. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas frequently harbor ARID1A and/or PTEN mutations. Serous carcinoma acquires TP53 mutations/inactivation at onset, with a significant subset harboring an additional mutation in PPP2R1A. This study examines the correlation between tumor histotype and genotype in 36 previously genotyped high-grade endometrial carcinomas. This included 23 endometrioid/clear cell genotype and 13 serous genotype tumors. Eight subspecialty pathologists reviewed representative online slides and rendered diagnoses before and after receiving p53, p16, and estrogen receptor immunostaining results. κ statistics for histotype-genotype concordance were calculated. The average κ values for histotype-genotype concordance was 0.55 (range, 0.30 to 0.67) on the basis of morphologic evaluation alone and it improved to 0.68 (range, 0.54 to 0.81) after immunophenotype consideration (P<0.001). Genotype-incompatible diagnoses were rendered by at least 2 pathologists in 12 of 36 cases (33%) (3 cases by 2/8 pathologists, 2 by 3/8, 2 by 4/8, 3 by 6/8, 1 by 7/8, and 1 case by 8/8 pathologists). Six of the 12 were endometrioid/clear cell genotype tumors, and the other 6 were serous genotype tumors. The histopathologic features associated with histotype-genotype-discordant cases were reviewed, and specific diagnostic recommendations were made to improve concordance. This study found that although the majority of morphologic diagnoses are genotype concordant, genotype-incompatible diagnoses are made in a significant subset of cases. Judicious use and interpretation of p53 immunohistochemistry in selected scenarios can improve histotype-genotype concordance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076778     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31828c63ed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  29 in total

1.  Molecular-based classification algorithm for endometrial carcinoma categorizes ovarian endometrioid carcinoma into prognostically significant groups.

Authors:  Carlos Parra-Herran; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Bin Xu; Sam Khalouei; Dina Bassiouny; Matthew Cesari; Nadia Ismiil; Sharon Nofech-Mozes
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Clinicopathological analysis of endometrial carcinomas harboring somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations.

Authors:  Yaser R Hussein; Britta Weigelt; Douglas A Levine; J Kenneth Schoolmeester; Linda N Dao; Bonnie L Balzer; Georgia Liles; Beth Karlan; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 3.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Practical issues in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Sonia Gatius; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Molecular Classification of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers Identifies Distinct Prognostic Subgroups.

Authors:  Tjalling Bosse; Remi A Nout; Jessica N McAlpine; Melissa K McConechy; Heidi Britton; Yaser R Hussein; Carlene Gonzalez; Raji Ganesan; Jane C Steele; Beth T Harrison; Esther Oliva; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Douglas A Levine; C Blake Gilks; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  TCGA Classification of Endometrial Cancer: the Place of Carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Antonio Travaglino; Antonio Raffone; Annarita Gencarelli; Antonio Mollo; Maurizio Guida; Luigi Insabato; Angela Santoro; Gian Franco Zannoni; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Bo Meng; Lien N Hoang; Noorah Almadani; Xiaodong Li; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Uterine High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sumi Thomas; Yaser Hussein; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Michele Cote; Oudai Hassan; Eman Abdulfatah; Baraa Alosh; Hui Guan; Robert A Soslow; Rouba Ali-Fehmi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Prognostic impact of histological review of high-grade endometrial carcinomas in a large Danish cohort.

Authors:  Marie Boennelycke; Elke E M Peters; Alicia Léon-Castillo; Vincent T H B M Smit; Tjalling Bosse; Ib Jarle Christensen; Gitte Ørtoft; Claus Høgdall; Estrid Høgdall
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Histopathological features of endometrial carcinomas associated with POLE mutations: implications for decisions about adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Salwa Bakhsh; Mary Kinloch; Lien N Hoang; Robert A Soslow; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee; Jessica N McAlpine; Melissa K McConechy; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.