Literature DB >> 33602681

Clinicopathologic and Genomic Analysis of TP53-Mutated Endometrial Carcinomas.

Lora H Ellenson1, Britta Weigelt2, Robert A Soslow2, Amir Momeni-Boroujeni1, Wissam Dahoud1, Chad M Vanderbilt1, Sarah Chiang1, Rajmohan Murali1, Eric V Rios-Doria3, Kaled M Alektiar4, Carol Aghajanian5, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum3, Marc Ladanyi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Copy number-high endometrial carcinomas were described by The Cancer Genome Atlas as high-grade endometrioid and serous cancers showing frequent copy-number alterations (CNA), low mutational burden (i.e., non-hypermutant), near-universal TP53 mutation, and unfavorable clinical outcomes. We sought to investigate and compare the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of non-hypermutant TP53-altered endometrial carcinomas of four histologic types. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas, defined as TP53-mutant tumors lacking microsatellite instability or pathogenic POLE mutations, were identified (n = 238) in a cohort of 1,239 endometrial carcinomas subjected to clinical massively parallel sequencing of 410-468 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutations and CNAs (n = 238), and clinicopathologic features were determined (n = 185, initial treatment planning at our institution).
RESULTS: TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas encompassed uterine serous (n = 102, 55.1%), high-grade endometrial carcinoma with ambiguous features/not otherwise specified (EC-NOS; n = 44, 23.8%), endometrioid carcinomas of all tumor grades (n = 28, 15.1%), and clear cell carcinomas (n = 11, 5.9%). PTEN mutations were significantly more frequent in endometrioid carcinomas, SPOP mutations in clear cell carcinomas, and CCNE1 amplification in serous carcinomas/EC-NOS; however, none of these genomic alterations were exclusive to any given histologic type. ERBB2 amplification was present at similar frequencies across TP53-mutated histologic types (7.7%-18.6%). Although overall survival was similar across histologic types, serous carcinomas presented more frequently at stage IV, had more persistent and/or recurrent disease, and reduced disease-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas display clinical and molecular similarities across histologic subtypes. Our data provide evidence to suggest performance of ERBB2 assessment in all TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas. Given the distinct clinical features of serous carcinomas, histologic classification continues to be relevant. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33602681      PMCID: PMC8530276          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  49 in total

1.  Early uterine serous carcinoma: clonal origin of extrauterine disease.

Authors:  R N Baergen; C D Warren; C Isacson; L H Ellenson
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Interobserver Agreement in Endometrial Carcinoma Histotype Diagnosis Varies Depending on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based Molecular Subgroup.

Authors:  Lien N Hoang; Mary A Kinloch; Joyce M Leo; Katherine Grondin; Cheng-Han Lee; Carol Ewanowich; Martin Köbel; Angela Cheng; Aline Talhouk; Melissa McConechy; David G Huntsman; Jessica N McAlpine; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma with associated peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  R A Soslow; E Pirog; C Isacson
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  The clinicopathologic significance of p53 and BAF-250a (ARID1A) expression in clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Katja Gwin; Mohamed M Desouki; Marta A Crispens; Howard W Jones; Dineo Khabele; Sharon X Liang; Wenxin Zheng; Khaled Mohammed; Jonathan L Hecht; Vinita Parkash
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Identification of molecular pathway aberrations in uterine serous carcinoma by genome-wide analyses.

Authors:  Elisabetta Kuhn; Ren-Chin Wu; Bin Guan; Gang Wu; Jinghui Zhang; Yue Wang; Lei Song; Xiguo Yuan; Lei Wei; Richard B S Roden; Kuan-Tin Kuo; Kentaro Nakayama; Blaise Clarke; Patricia Shaw; Narciso Olvera; Robert J Kurman; Douglas A Levine; Tian-Li Wang; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Comparison of estrogen and progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and p53 immunoreactivity in uterine endometrioid carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma with squamous, mucinous, secretory, and ciliated cell differentiation.

Authors:  S F Lax; E S Pizer; B M Ronnett; R J Kurman
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: Earlier prognostic information to guide treatment.

Authors:  Aline Talhouk; Lien N Hoang; Melissa K McConechy; Quentin Nakonechny; Joyce Leo; Angela Cheng; Samuel Leung; Winnie Yang; Amy Lum; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee; Robert A Soslow; David G Huntsman; C Blake Gilks; Jessica N McAlpine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients.

Authors:  Ahmet Zehir; Ryma Benayed; Ronak H Shah; Aijazuddin Syed; Sumit Middha; Hyunjae R Kim; Preethi Srinivasan; Jianjiong Gao; Debyani Chakravarty; Sean M Devlin; Matthew D Hellmann; David A Barron; Alison M Schram; Meera Hameed; Snjezana Dogan; Dara S Ross; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Deborah F DeLair; JinJuan Yao; Diana L Mandelker; Donavan T Cheng; Raghu Chandramohan; Abhinita S Mohanty; Ryan N Ptashkin; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Meera Prasad; Mustafa H Syed; Anoop Balakrishnan Rema; Zhen Y Liu; Khedoudja Nafa; Laetitia Borsu; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Ruben Bacares; Iwona J Kiecka; Anna Razumova; Julie B Son; Lisa Stewart; Tessara Baldi; Kerry A Mullaney; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Efsevia Vakiani; Adam A Abeshouse; Alexander V Penson; Philip Jonsson; Niedzica Camacho; Matthew T Chang; Helen H Won; Benjamin E Gross; Ritika Kundra; Zachary J Heins; Hsiao-Wei Chen; Sarah Phillips; Hongxin Zhang; Jiaojiao Wang; Angelica Ochoa; Jonathan Wills; Michael Eubank; Stacy B Thomas; Stuart M Gardos; Dalicia N Reales; Jesse Galle; Robert Durany; Roy Cambria; Wassim Abida; Andrea Cercek; Darren R Feldman; Mrinal M Gounder; A Ari Hakimi; James J Harding; Gopa Iyer; Yelena Y Janjigian; Emmet J Jordan; Ciara M Kelly; Maeve A Lowery; Luc G T Morris; Antonio M Omuro; Nitya Raj; Pedram Razavi; Alexander N Shoushtari; Neerav Shukla; Tara E Soumerai; Anna M Varghese; Rona Yaeger; Jonathan Coleman; Bernard Bochner; Gregory J Riely; Leonard B Saltz; Howard I Scher; Paul J Sabbatini; Mark E Robson; David S Klimstra; Barry S Taylor; Jose Baselga; Nikolaus Schultz; David M Hyman; Maria E Arcila; David B Solit; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 9.  Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

Authors:  Robert A Soslow; Carmen Tornos; Kay J Park; Anais Malpica; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Esther Oliva; Vinita Parkash; Joseph Carlson; W Glenn McCluggage; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.762

10.  Impact of endometrial carcinoma histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups.

Authors:  Antonio Travaglino; Antonio Raffone; Cristina Stradella; Rosanna Esposito; Paola Moretta; Cinzia Gallo; Giuliana Orlandi; Luigi Insabato; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.344

View more
  6 in total

1.  Microsatellite Instability-High Endometrial Cancers with MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation Have Distinct Molecular and Clinical Profiles.

Authors:  Beryl L Manning-Geist; Ying L Liu; Kelly A Devereaux; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Qin C Zhou; Weining Ma; Pier Selenica; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; Lea A Moukarzel; Timothy Hoang; Sushmita Gordhandas; Maria M Rubinstein; Claire F Friedman; Carol Aghajanian; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Zsofia K Stadler; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Alexia Iasonos; Dmitriy Zamarin; Lora H Ellenson; Yulia Lakhman; Diana L Mandelker; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 2.  The evolving role of morphology in endometrial cancer diagnostics: From histopathology and molecular testing towards integrative data analysis by deep learning.

Authors:  Sarah Fremond; Viktor Hendrik Koelzer; Nanda Horeweg; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Genomic landscape of endometrial carcinomas of no specific molecular profile.

Authors:  Amir Momeni-Boroujeni; Bastien Nguyen; Chad M Vanderbilt; Marc Ladanyi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Carol Aghajanian; Lora H Ellenson; Britta Weigelt; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.209

4.  Uterine choriocarcinoma arising from serous carcinoma in a postmenopausal woman: an analysis of next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 immunochemistry.

Authors:  Meiping Li; Lei Bao; Bo Lu; Wenshun Ge; Lifang Ren
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.196

5.  Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma of the Vagina Harboring TP53 Mutation.

Authors:  Hyunjee Lee; Hyunjin Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05

6.  Performance of a HER2 testing algorithm specific for p53-abnormal endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Vermij; Naveena Singh; Alicia Leon-Castillo; Nanda Horeweg; Jan Oosting; Joseph Carlson; Vincent Smit; Blake Gilks; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.