Literature DB >> 26165196

Targeted Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Individuals.

Pamela M Marcus1, Andrew N Freedman2, Muin J Khoury2.   

Abstract

Targeted cancer screening refers to use of disease risk information to identify those most likely to benefit from screening. Researchers have begun to explore the possibility of refining screening regimens for average-risk individuals using genetic and non-genetic risk factors and previous screening experience. Average-risk individuals are those not known to be at substantially elevated risk, including those without known inherited predisposition, without comorbidities known to increase cancer risk, and without previous diagnosis of cancer or pre-cancer. In this paper, we describe the goals of targeted cancer screening in average-risk individuals, present factors on which cancer screening has been targeted, discuss inclusion of targeting in screening guidelines issued by major U.S. professional organizations, and present evidence to support or question such inclusion. Screening guidelines for average-risk individuals currently target age; smoking (lung cancer only); and, in some instances, race; family history of cancer; and previous negative screening history (cervical cancer only). No guidelines include common genomic polymorphisms. RCTs suggest that targeting certain ages and smoking histories reduces disease-specific cancer mortality, although some guidelines extend ages and smoking histories based on statistical modeling. Guidelines that are based on modestly elevated disease risk typically have either no or little evidence of an ability to affect a mortality benefit. In time, targeted cancer screening is likely to include genetic factors and past screening experience as well as non-genetic factors other than age, smoking, and race, but it is of utmost importance that clinical implementation be evidence-based. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26165196      PMCID: PMC4615467          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  25 in total

1.  Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Patricia Hartge; Ross Prentice; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Heather Spencer Feigelson; W Ryan Diver; Michael J Thun; David G Cox; Susan E Hankinson; Peter Kraft; Bernard Rosner; Christine D Berg; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Mark E Sherman; Rowan Chlebowski; Charles Kooperberg; Rebecca D Jackson; Dennis W Buckman; Peter Hui; Ruth Pfeiffer; Kevin B Jacobs; Gilles D Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Mitchell H Gail; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Age-specific risk of incident prostate cancer and risk of death from prostate cancer defined by the number of affected family members.

Authors:  Andreas Brandt; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Jan Sundquist; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Practice bulletin no. 122: Breast cancer screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 131: Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Jenny Chang-Claude; Christoph M Seiler; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Colorectal cancer in African Americans.

Authors:  Sangeeta Agrawal; Anand Bhupinderjit; Manoop S Bhutani; Lisa Boardman; Cuong Nguyen; Yvonne Romero; Radhika Srinivasan; Radhika Srinvasan; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Polygenic susceptibility to prostate and breast cancer: implications for personalised screening.

Authors:  N Pashayan; S W Duffy; S Chowdhury; T Dent; H Burton; D E Neal; D F Easton; R Eeles; P Pharoah
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; David A Johnson; Joseph C Anderson; Phillip S Schoenfeld; Carol A Burke; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Cumulative impact of common genetic variants and other risk factors on colorectal cancer risk in 42,103 individuals.

Authors:  Malcolm G Dunlop; Albert Tenesa; Susan M Farrington; Stephane Ballereau; David H Brewster; Thibaud Koessler; Paul Pharoah; Clemens Schafmayer; Jochen Hampe; Henry Völzke; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Susanna von Holst; Simone Picelli; Annika Lindblom; Mark A Jenkins; John L Hopper; Graham Casey; David Duggan; Polly A Newcomb; Anna Abulí; Xavier Bessa; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Iina Niittymäki; Sari Tuupanen; Auli Karhu; Lauri Aaltonen; Brent Zanke; Tom Hudson; Steven Gallinger; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Axel Walther; David Kerr; Steven Lubbe; Peter Broderick; Ian Chandler; Alan Pittman; Steven Penegar; Harry Campbell; Ian Tomlinson; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  7 in total

1.  Interaction Landscape of Inherited Polymorphisms with Somatic Events in Cancer.

Authors:  Hannah Carter; Rachel Marty; Matan Hofree; Andrew M Gross; James Jensen; Kathleen M Fisch; Xingyu Wu; Christopher DeBoever; Eric L Van Nostrand; Yan Song; Emily Wheeler; Jason F Kreisberg; Scott M Lippman; Gene W Yeo; J Silvio Gutkind; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  Mixture models for undiagnosed prevalent disease and interval-censored incident disease: applications to a cohort assembled from electronic health records.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Qing Pan; Noorie Hyun; Mark Schiffman; Barbara Fetterman; Philip E Castle; Thomas Lorey; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Family History and Breast Cancer Risk Among Older Women in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Diana L Miglioretti; Weiwei Zhu; Joshua Demb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Brian Sprague; Jeffrey A Tice; Tracy Onega; Louise M Henderson; Diana S M Buist; Elad Ziv; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  Risk-Adjusted Cancer Screening and Prevention (RiskAP): Complementing Screening for Early Disease Detection by a Learning Screening Based on Risk Factors.

Authors:  Rita K Schmutzler; Björn Schmitz-Luhn; Bettina Borisch; Peter Devilee; Diana Eccles; Per Hall; Judith Balmaña; Stefania Boccia; Peter Dabrock; Günter Emons; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Jacek Gronwald; Stefanie Houwaart; Stefan Huster; Karin Kast; Alexander Katalinic; Sabine C Linn; Sowmiya Moorthie; Paul Pharoah; Kerstin Rhiem; Tade Spranger; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Johannes Jozef Marten van Delden; Marc van den Bulcke; Christiane Woopen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.268

5.  Association of Breast Density With Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Aged 65 Years or Older by Age Group and Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Shailesh M Advani; Weiwei Zhu; Joshua Demb; Brian L Sprague; Tracy Onega; Louise M Henderson; Diana S M Buist; Dongyu Zhang; John T Schousboe; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02

6.  Community education to enhance the more equitable use of precision medicine in Northern Manhattan.

Authors:  Grace C Hillyer; Karen M Schmitt; Andria Reyes; Alejandro Cruz; Maria Lizardo; Gary K Schwartz; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for older women: current perspectives.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Joshua Demb; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.458

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.