| Literature DB >> 26163799 |
Jorge Jovicich1, Ludovico Minati2, Moira Marizzoni3, Rocco Marchitelli4, Roser Sala-Llonch5, David Bartrés-Faz5, Jennifer Arnold6, Jens Benninghoff6, Ute Fiedler6, Luca Roccatagliata7, Agnese Picco8, Flavio Nobili8, Oliver Blin9, Stephanie Bombois10, Renaud Lopes10, Régis Bordet10, Julien Sein11, Jean-Philippe Ranjeva11, Mira Didic12, Hélène Gros-Dagnac13, Pierre Payoux13, Giada Zoccatelli14, Franco Alessandrini14, Alberto Beltramello14, Núria Bargalló15, Antonio Ferretti16, Massimo Caulo16, Marco Aiello17, Carlo Cavaliere17, Andrea Soricelli18, Lucilla Parnetti19, Roberto Tarducci20, Piero Floridi21, Magda Tsolaki22, Manos Constantinidis23, Antonios Drevelegas24, Paolo Maria Rossini25, Camillo Marra26, Peter Schönknecht27, Tilman Hensch27, Karl-Titus Hoffmann28, Joost P Kuijer29, Pieter Jelle Visser30, Frederik Barkhof31, Giovanni B Frisoni32.
Abstract
To date, limited data are available regarding the inter-site consistency of test-retest reproducibility of functional connectivity measurements, in particular with regard to integrity of the Default Mode Network (DMN) in elderly participants. We implemented a harmonized resting-state fMRI protocol on 13 clinical scanners at 3.0T using vendor-provided sequences. Each site scanned a group of 5 healthy elderly participants twice, at least a week apart. We evaluated inter-site differences and test-retest reproducibility of both temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) and functional connectivity measurements derived from: i) seed-based analysis (SBA) with seed in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), ii) group independent component analysis (ICA) separately for each site (site ICA), and iii) consortium ICA, with group ICA across the whole consortium. Despite protocol harmonization, significant and quantitatively important inter-site differences remained in the tSNR of resting-state fMRI data; these were plausibly driven by hardware and pulse sequence differences across scanners which could not be harmonized. Nevertheless, the tSNR test-retest reproducibility in the consortium was high (ICC=0.81). The DMN was consistently extracted across all sites and analysis methods. While significant inter-site differences in connectivity scores were found, there were no differences in the associated test-retest error. Overall, ICA measurements were more reliable than PCC-SBA, with site ICA showing higher reproducibility than consortium ICA. Across the DMN nodes, the PCC yielded the most reliable measurements (≈4% test-retest error, ICC=0.85), the medial frontal cortex the least reliable (≈12%, ICC=0.82) and the lateral parietal cortices were in between (site ICA). Altogether these findings support usage of harmonized multisite studies of resting-state functional connectivity to characterize longitudinal effects in studies that assess disease progression and treatment response.Entities:
Keywords: Default Mode Network; Functional connectivity; Multi-center; Multi-site MRI; Reproducibility
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26163799 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 6.556