| Literature DB >> 26161896 |
Claudio A González-Wevar1, Pilar Salinas2, Mathias Hüne3, Nicolás I Segovia2, Luis Vargas-Chacoff4, Marcela Astorga5, Juan I Cañete6, Elie Poulin2.
Abstract
Major geologic and climatic changes during the Quaternary exerted a major role in shaping past and contemporary distribution of genetic diversity and structure of aquatic organisms in southern South America. In fact, the northern glacial limit along the Pacific coast, an area of major environmental changes in terms of topography, currents, and water salinity, represents a major biogeographic transition for marine and freshwater species. We used mitochondrial DNA sequences (D-loop) to investigate the consequences of Quaternary glacial cycles over the pattern of genetic diversity and structure of G. maculatus (Pisces: Galaxiidae) along two biogeographical provinces in the Chilean coast. Extreme levels of genetic diversity and strong phylogeographic structure characterize the species suggesting a low amount of influence of the last glacial cycle over its demography. However, we recognized contrasting patterns of genetic diversity and structure between main biogeographical areas here analyzed. Along the Intermediate Area (38°-41° S) each estuarine population constitutes a different unit. In contrast, Magellanic populations (43°-53° S) exhibited low levels of genetic differentiation. Contrasting patterns of genetic diversity and structure recorded in the species between the analyzed biogeographic areas are consistent with the marked differences in abiotic factors (i.e., different coastal configurations, Quaternary glacial histories, and oceanographic regimes) and to inherent characteristics of the species (i.e., salt-tolerance, physiology, and reproductive behavior).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26161896 PMCID: PMC4498917 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Sampling localities of Galaxias maculatus along the Chilean coast.
Diversity índices and neutrality tests in Galaxias maculatus along it distribution in the Chilean coast.
| Locality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tajima´s D | Fu´s FS | M. D. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moncul River | 24 | 24 | 1.000 | 85 | 20.20 | 0.022 | -0.81 | -10.16 | M | |
| Queule River | 23 | 23 | 1.000 | 85 | 22.93 | 0.025 | -0.64 | -8.55 | M | |
| Lingue River | 24 | 18 | 0.942 | 78 | 23.23 | 0.025 | -0.010 | -3.53 | M | |
| Valdivia River | 28 | 24 | 0.989 | 68 | 24.79 | 0.027 | 1.03 | -3.76 | M | |
| Chaihuín River | 41 | 31 | 0.974 | 106 | 24.94 | 0.027 | -0.56 | -3.90 | M | |
| Maullín River | 27 | 27 | 1.000 | 112 | 30.55 | 0.033 | -0.28 | -9.12 | M | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Yelcho River | 22 | 22 | 1.000 | 72 | 15.84 | 0.017 | -1.19 | -10.52 | M | |
| Concoto Island | 26 | 24 | 0.994 | 54 | 10.88 | 0.011 | -1.09 | -12.27 | M | |
| Williams Channel | 26 | 20 | 0.978 | 42 | 10.74 | 0.011 | -0.33 | -5.24 | M | |
| María Eugenia Bay | 23 | 23 | 1.000 | 63 | 15.33 | 0.016 | -0.66 | -11.66 | M | |
| Tortel | 27 | 26 | 0.997 | 71 | 15.88 | 0.017 | -1.01 | -11.95 | M | |
| Pascua River | 45 | 43 | 0.998 | 75 | 13.24 | 0.014 | -1.28 | -32.40 | M | |
| Strait of Magellan | 17 | 16 | 0.993 | 51 | 15.52 | 0.016 | -0.33 | -4.32 | M | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n = number of analyzed individuals; k = number of haplotypes; S = polymorphic sites; H = haplotype diversity; П = average number of pairwise differences; π = nucleotide diversity. M.D. Mismatch Distribution, M = Multimodal.
*p<0.05
**p<0.01
*** p<0.001.
Mean general pairwise values of differentiation (ФST) between Galaxias maculatus populations.
| Locality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | *** | ||||||||||||
| 2 |
| *** | |||||||||||
| 3 |
|
| *** | ||||||||||
| 4 |
|
|
| *** | |||||||||
| 5 |
|
|
|
| *** | ||||||||
| 6 |
|
|
|
|
| *** | |||||||
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| *** | ||||||
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.05 | *** | |||||
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.03 | *** | ||||
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.05 | 0.03 | *** | |||
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | *** | ||
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | *** | |
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | *** |
Where: 1) Moncul River; 2) Queule River; 3) Lingue River; 4) Valdivia River; 5) Chaihuín River; 6) Maullín River; 7) Yelcho River; 8) Concoto Island; 9) Williams Channel; 10) María Eugenia Bay; 11) Tortel; 12) Pascua River; 13) Strait of Magellan. Statistically significant comparisons (after Bonferroni correction) and 100,000 iterations are marked in bold.
Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) depicting the percentage of variation explained among groups (Moncul River, Queule River, Lingue River, Valdivia River, Chaihuín River, Maullín River, and Magellanic Province populations), among populations within groups, and within populations.
Where FSC represents differntiation within populations among groups while FCT represents differentiation among groups (*** p<0.001, ** p<0.01).
| Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 6 | 1571.864 | 6.14210 Va | 36.47 | |
| Among populations within groups | 6 | 88.683 | 0.18003 Vb | 1.10 | |
| Within populations | 340 | 3424.433 | 10.07186 Vc | 61.44 | |
| Total | 352 | 5084.980 | 16.39400 | ||
| Fixation Index | |||||
| FSC | 0.01756*** | ||||
| FCT | 0.37466*** | ||||
Fig 2Relationship between linearized genetic differentiation (NST) and geographic distances (Km) along the Intermediate Area and the Magellanic Province.
Red circles and blue triangles represent pairwise values in the Intermediate Area and the Magellanic Province, respectively.
Fig 3Maximum parsimony haplotype network including 353 individuals of Galaxias maculatus mtDNA D-loop sequences.
Each haplotype is represented by a colored circle the locality where was collected. The size of the circles are proportional to its frequency in the whole sampling effort. Colored areas mark the different recognized haplogroups where Green (Hap 01), Red (Hap 02), Yellow (Hap 03), and blue (Hap 04).
Fig 4Distribution of the recognized haplogroups in G. maculatus along the sampling localities.
Fig 5Historical demographic trends of the effective population sizes (Ne) constructed using a Bayesian skyline plot approach based on D-loop haplotypes of Galaxias maculatus along its distribution in the Chilean coast (Intermediate Area and Magellanic Province).
The y-axis is the product of effective population size (Ne) and generation length in a log scale while the x-axis is the time 103 before present. The median estimate (solid line) and 95% highest probabilities density (HPD; grey areas) are shown. The thick dashed line represent the time of the most common ancestor (trmca) and the thin dashed line represents time for population expansion.
Log marginal likelihoods (lmL) and log Bayes factor (LBF) comparisons for different migration models between the Intermediate Area and the Magellanic Province in G. maculatus.
Where IA = Intermediate Area; MP = Magellanic Province.
| Model | Bezier lmL | LBF | Model prob | Model rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. full migration | -8199.540 | -55.779 | <0.001 | 3 |
| 2. IA to MP | -8180.607 | -17.920 | <0.001 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. panmixia | -8397.543 | -451.779 | <0.001 | 4 |
Estimation of isolation-with-migration model implemented in IMa2 including; migration rates (m) in each direction (mN->S, mS->N), estimated splitting time (τ) between provinces (in years ago), and effective population size of both provinces (ΘN, ΘS) and ancestral population size (ΘA) converted in demographic units (individuals).
| m N->S | m S->N | τ (YA) | ΘN | ΘS | ΘA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hight Point | 0.0005ns | 0.034ns | 28,347 | 1,636,744 | 637,824 | 2,992,261 |
| 95% HPD | 0.0005–0.1285 | 0.0025–0.1285 | 22,948–36,447 | 995,545–2,987,760 | 43,534–907,802 | 2,048,461–4,513,139 |
For each parameter, the most probable value (high point) and the 95% highest posterior density (95% HPD) of the marginal posterior probabilities are shown. Ns = non significant for the LTR for migration rates estimation. The convertion of scale in the τ and Θ parameter was carried on using a specific substitution rate of 12% per million year estimated by Salinas [52].