| Literature DB >> 24586356 |
Pilar A Haye1, Nicolás I Segovia2, Natalia C Muñoz-Herrera1, Francisca E Gálvez3, Andrea Martínez4, Andrés Meynard5, María C Pardo-Gandarillas6, Elie Poulin4, Sylvain Faugeron5.
Abstract
The role of dispersal potential on phylogeographic structure, evidenced by the degree of genetic structure and the presence of coincident genetic and biogeographic breaks, was evaluated in a macrogeographic comparative approach along the north-central coast of Chile, across the biogeographic transition zone at 30°S. Using 2,217 partial sequences of the mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase I gene of eight benthic invertebrate species along ca. 2,600 km of coast, we contrasted dispersal potential with genetic structure and determined the concordance between genetic divergence between biogeographic regions and the biogeographic transition zone at 30°S. Genetic diversity and differentiation highly differed between species with high and low dispersal potential. Dispersal potential, sometimes together with biogeographic region, was the factor that best explained the genetic structure of the eight species. The three low dispersal species, and one species assigned to the high dispersal category, had a phylogeographic discontinuity coincident with the biogeographic transition zone at 30°S. Furthermore, coalescent analyses based on the isolation-with-migration model validate that the split between biogeographic regions north and south of 30°S has a historic origin. The signatures of the historic break in high dispersers is parsimoniously explained by the homogenizing effects of gene flow that have erased the genetic signatures, if ever existed, in high dispersers. Of the four species with structure across the break, only two had significant albeit very low levels of asymmetric migration across the transition zone. Historic processes have led to the current biogeographic and phylogeographic structure of marine species with limited dispersal along the north-central coast of Chile, with a strong lasting impact in their genetic structure.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24586356 PMCID: PMC3929388 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Species analyzed and the corresponding depth range in meters that they inhabit, and dispersal potential (DP) as number of days that larvae spend in the water column.
| Phylum | Species | Depth range | DP |
| Crustacea |
| 0–3 | >90 |
|
| 0 |
| |
|
| 0–3 | 25 | |
| Mollusca |
| 0–20 |
|
|
| 0–9 |
| |
| Echinodermata |
| 0–10 | >60 |
|
| 1–80 | 38 | |
|
| 0–40 | >90 |
*Considered as low dispersers in this study.
Latitudinal range analyzed in degrees for each species (Lat); number of localities (NL); number of sequences analyzed per species (NS); length of final truncated alignment (LA); percentage of variable sites (%V); average haplotype (h) and nucleotide (π) diversities; Snn; global ΦST, and Mantel correlation coefficient (MCC).
| Species | Lat | NL | NS | LA | %V | h | π | Snn | ΦST | MCC |
|
| 23 | 10 | 312 | 606 | 16.17 | 0.7643 | 0.0042 | 0.1429 | −0.001 | −0.317 |
|
| 16 | 9 | 266 | 630 | 6.35 | 0.8654 | 0.0034 | 0.1464 | 0.0093 | 0.139 |
|
| 16 | 8 | 70 | 633 | 23.22 | 0.5744 | 0.0021 |
|
|
|
|
| 21 | 11 | 184 | 591 | 8.12 | 0.7849 | 0.0024 | 0.1320 | 0.0231 | 0.056 |
|
| 16 | 8 | 324 | 672 | 2.66 | 0.3620 | 0.0005 |
|
|
|
|
| 23 | 10 | 285 | 609 | 14.12 | 0.8253 | 0.0063 |
|
|
|
|
| 21 | 12 | 414 | 663 | 5.28 | 0.4392 | 0.0008 |
|
|
|
|
| 17 | 12 | 362 | 546 | 8.43 | 0.8201 | 0.0035 | 0.0837 | −0.087 | −0.172 |
|
| 18.6 | 10 | 277 | 619 | 10.54 | 0.6795 | 0.0029 | 0.2605 | 0.2476 | 0.306 |
Significant values are in bold.
Figure 1Map of the study area along the coast of Chile indicating the sampling sites and the sample size per site for each of the analyzed species.
Figure 2Box-plots of global (a and b) and per population (c and d) haplotype (a and c) and nucleotide (b and d) diversities for high and low dispersers.
GLMMs performed to compare genetic structure in species with high and low dispersal potential and biogeographic regions (north and south of 30°S), with respect to haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity, number of substitutions, and genetic differentiation (global ΦST).
| GLMM | Estimate | Standard error | t-value |
| |
| Haplotype Diversity: AIC = −35.33; | |||||
| Intercept | 0.804 | 0.029 | 29.259 |
| |
| DP | −0.395 | 0.054 | −7.590 |
| |
| BR | 0.016 | 0.046 | 0.361 | 0.712 | |
| DP x BR | −0.016 | 0.075 | −0.227 | 0.816 | |
| Nucleotide Diversity: AIC = −750.4; | |||||
| Intercept | 0.004 | 0.001 | 5.370 |
| |
| DP | −0.002 | 0.001 | −3.144 |
| |
| BR | 0.001 | 0.000 | 2.714 |
| |
| DP x BR | −0.001 | 0.001 | −2.339 |
| |
| Number of Substitutions: AIC = −505.3; | |||||
| Intercept | 15.219 | 3.034 | 5.306 |
| |
| DP | −10.469 | 3.416 | −3.221 |
| |
| BR | 1.935 | 1.581 | 1.284 | 0.190 | |
| DP x BR | −3.155 | 2.588 | −1.261 | 0.199 | |
| Genetic differentiation (pairwise ΦST): AIC = −518.5; | |||||
| Intercept | 0.057 | 0.027 | 2.216 |
| |
| DP | 0.661 | 0.235 | 2.827 |
| |
| BD | −0.036 | 0.014 | −2.925 |
| |
| DP x BD | −0.319 | 0.024 | −14.163 |
| |
Species were nested to dispersal in the models. For each model the AIC value is shown and the variance estimate of fixed effects (Estimate), standard error, degrees of freedom (df), t-value ratio and P values of the intercept and of the contributions of dispersal potential (DP), biogeographic region (BR) (for genetic diversities and number of substitutions) or biogeographic differentiation (BD) (for genetic differentiation), and the interaction of DP x BR and DP x BD for diversities and differentiation, respectively.
Significant values are in bold (P<0.05).
Figure 3Box-plots of global (a) and average population-pairwise (b) ΦST for high and low dispersers.
AMOVA for all species.
| Species | Among Groups (N and S of 30°S) | Among populations within groups | Within populations |
|
| −0.29 | 0.09 | 100.2 |
|
| −0.62 | 1.54 | 99.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.42 | 1.89 | 97.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.03 | −0.84 | 100.87 |
Percentage of variation explained among groups north and south of 30°S, among populations within groups, and within populations are shown.
Values in bold indicate association to significant AMOVA’s Φ-statistics.
GLMMs performed to compare species with high and low dispersal potential (DP) in AMOVA’s F statistics among groups (Φ), among populations within groups (Φ), and within populations (Φ).
| GLMM | Estimate | Standard error | t-value |
| |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.050 | 0.171 | 0.295 | 0.497 | |
|
| 0.435 | 0.251 | 1.739 |
| |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.012 | 0.180 | 0.064 | 0.874 | |
|
| 0.386 | 0.264 | 1.463 |
| |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.045 | 0.169 | 0.264 | 0.540 | |
|
| 0.588 | 0.248 | 2.372 |
| |
Species were nested to dispersal in the model. For each model the AIC value, and the variance estimate of fixed effects (Estimate), standard error, degrees of freedom (df), t-value ratio and P values of the intercept are shown.
Significant values are in bold (P<0.05).
Figure 4Median joining haplotype networks of eight species analyzed of the Chilean coast.
Insert with map details the biogeographic regions north and south of 30°S in the analyzed coast section and shades associated with each of them that were used to mark the geographic location of haplotypes. All haplotype networks are standardized in such way that small circles represent haplotypes present in one individual. Mutational steps (lines between circles) were kept the same length excepting for the network of Emerita analoga where mutational steps arising from the most common haplotype were kept to the minimum length to allow accommodating all derived haplotypes.
SAMOVA of species with spatial genetic structure.
| Species | Best | F |
|
|
| Lat |
|
| 17 | 0.92960 |
| 0.56871 |
| 30°S |
|
| 4 | 0.72027 |
| 0.69155 | 0.13392 | 30°S |
|
| 2 | 0.24874 |
| – | – | 31.8°S |
|
| 2 | 0.35528 |
| – | – | 31.8–34.4°S |
Best k corresponds to the detected optimal number of populations, the F value of optimal k and associated probability (P) are shown. For the two taxa that have optimal k >2, the corresponding F is also shown (k (2) F), as well as the associated p-value (k (2) P), and the latitude that limits the two groups (Lat k (2)).
Significant values are in bold.
Figure 5Isolation-with-migration analysis of four species with significant structure across the 30°S biogeographic break.
(a) Marginal posterior probability distribution of migration rate estimates in each direction for each species. (b) Estimated Θ (2 Ne) values for each biogeographic region (north and south) as well as the ancestral Θ against genetic differentiation (global ΦST). Asterisks denote estimated Θ 95% HPD that do not overlap with either ancestral Θ or the estimated Θ in the other biogeographic region. (c) Marginal posterior probability distributions of divergence time (t) estimates expressed in thousands of years (Kyr). Divergence time estimates were scaled using 2% and 10% per million year substitution rates. (d) Highest probability value of estimated migration rates (m) in each direction, and divergence times (t) expressed in thousands of years (Kyr) scaled using 2% per million year substitution rate, versus genetic differentiation (global ΦST). Asterisks indicate significant values based on the likelihood ratio test.
Estimates of migration rates (m) in each direction across 30°S, time of divergence (t) between biogeographic regions, and genetic diversities (Θ) (north = ΘN; south = ΘS; ancestral = ΘA), based on the isolation-with-migration model implemented in IMa2.
| Species |
|
|
|
| ΘN | ΘS | ΘA | |
|
| HP | 0.00 | 0.00 | 548.90 | 109.80 | 14.66 | 4.96 | 29.21 |
| 95% HPD | 0.00–0.17 | 0.00–0.33 | 335.70–1,665 | 67.10–333 | 6.64–29.84 | 0.00–196.50 | 15.50–56.60 | |
|
| HP | 0.419 | 0.01 | 50.70 | 10.20 | 2.08 | 0.81 | 5.79 |
| 95% HPD | 0–6.32 | 0.00–5.76 | 14.90–699.40 | 3.00–139.90 | 0.55–7.60 | 0.18–44.07 | 2.15–15.62 | |
|
| HP | 0.08 |
| 83.30 | 16.70 | 21 | 1,703 | 47.00 |
| 95% HPD | 0.00–0.76 |
| 53.40–233.20 | 10.70–46.60 | 3–53 | 771–1,999 | 23.00–85.00 | |
|
| HP |
|
| 15.50 | 3.10 | 169.50 | 52.40 | 151.50 |
| HPD 95% |
|
| 7.50–33.20 | 1.50–6.60 | 106.50–310.50 | 42–68.40 | 94.50–280.50 |
For each parameter per species, the high point (HP) and 95% highest posterior density (95% HPD) of the marginal posterior probabilities are shown. Significant m values of the LRT are denoted with asterisks; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. t was scaled using substitution rates of 2% and 10% per million years, t 2% and t 10% respectively as is expressed in thousands of years (Kyr).
Significant values are in bold.