| Literature DB >> 26161659 |
Will A Overholt1, Rodrigo Diaz2, Erin Rosskopf3, Stefan J Green4, William A Overholt5.
Abstract
Bacteria associated with sap-feeding insect herbivores include not only symbionts that may increase their hosts' fitness but also harmful plant pathogens. Calophya spp. gall-inducing psyllids (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) are being investigated for their potential as biological control agents of the noxious weed, Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolia), in Florida. Although there are no examples of plant pathogen transmission by members of the family Calophyidae, several insects in the superfamily Psylloidea are known to transmit pathogenic bacteria in the genera Candidatus Liberibacter and Candidatus Phytoplasma. To determine whether Calophya spp. harbor potentially harmful plant pathogenic bacteria, we sequenced small subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicons generated from individuals from four Calophya spp. populations: All microbial SSU gene sequences fell into the bacterial domain, with 98-99% belonging to the Proteobacteria. The Calophya microbiomes contained a relatively simple community, with 49-79 operational taxonomic units (OTUs; 97%) detected, and only 5-8 OTUs with greater than 1% abundance. Candidatus Carsonella showed the highest relative abundance, with OTUs from this candidate genus representing between 51-65% of all recovered sequences. The next most abundant clade observed was an unclassified Enterobacteriacae group closely related to bacteria from the genera Buchnera and Blochmannia that ranged from 20-31% in relative abundance. Wolbachia populations were the third most abundant group and represented 7-27% of the diversity in microbial OTUs. No SSU rRNA gene sequences from putative pathogenic bacteria from the genera Ca. Liberibacter or Ca. Phytoplasma were detected in the microbiomes of the four Calophya populations. The probability that infected psyllids were present in our colonies, but were not sampled, was extremley low (1.39 x 10(-10)). As far as we are aware, our study is the first to characterize the microbiome of a candidate biological control agent, and coupled with previous work demonstrating a high degree of host specificity and absence of plant viruses, suggests that releasing Calophya spp. in United States poses minimal risk to non-target plants.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26161659 PMCID: PMC4498736 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Colony designations, species, origins and Florida State Collection of Arthropods voucher numbers of Calophya spp. examined for microbiome diversity.
| Designation | Species | Origin in Brazil | Voucher no. Florida State Collection of Arthropods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salvador |
| 12.908°S, 38.336°W Salvador, Bahia State | E2013-3192-1 |
|
|
| 26.921°S, 48.640°W Balneario Camboriu, Santa Catarina State | E2014-5749-1 |
| Carapina |
| 20.213°S, 40.229°W, Carapina, Espiritu Santo State | E2013-6744-1 |
| Ubu | undescribed | 20.786°S, 40.579°WUbu, Espiritu Santo State | E2013-6743-1 |
Fig 1The diversity, composition, and phylogeny of dominant members of the Calophya spp. microbiome.
(A) Shannon diversity indices for each microbiome sampled. The average value for each Calophya sp. (run in triplicate) is indicated with a line. Superscripts indicate groups that are statistically different by pairwise t-tests. (B) Microbial community composition for each microbiome analyzed. OTU abundances were estimated by converting libraries to a common scale using DESeq2, and normalized using total counts. OTUs from each dominant clade are colored with the same hue, and in all cases these dominant clades represent >98% of the total community. OTU bars are connected with semi-transparent edges to make it easier to distinguish between different OTUs within the same group. (C) Dominant OTUs were inserted into a pre-compiled phylogenetic tree using ARB. OTU are labeled using the same color scheme as in (B).
Sequencing statistics for Calophya spp. microbiomes.
| SampleID | Sequences Retrieved | Number of OTUs | Estimated Richness | Shannon (H') | Num OTU > 1% Abundance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salvador A | 185424 | 50 (45) | 65 [77%] | 1.25 (1.25) | 5 (5) |
| Salvador B | 190544 | 54 (46) | 66.46 [81%] | 1.26 (1.26) | 5 (5) |
| Salvador C | 200392 | 49 (43) | 61.52 [80%] | 1.26 (1.25) | 5 (5) |
| Ubu A | 180116 | 69 (59) | 85.82 [80%] | 1.22 (1.22) | 5 (5) |
| Ubu B | 167006 | 64 (53) | 77.08 [83%] | 1.21 (1.22) | 5 (5) |
| Ubu C | 155472 | 62 (56) | 81.51 [76%] | 1.24 (1.24) | 5 (5) |
| Carapina A | 172604 | 58 (55) | 79.69 [73%] | 1.16 (1.17) | 5 (5) |
| Carapina B | 158362 | 61 (60) | 87.45 [70%] | 1.22 (1.22) | 5 (5) |
| Carapina C | 151683 | 68 (63) | 92.16 [74%] | 1.15 (1.15) | 5 (5) |
|
| 184772 | 71 (63) | 91.68 [77%] | 1.44 (1.45) | 8 (8) |
|
| 179729 | 79 (69) | 101.33 [78%] | 1.43 (1.44) | 8 (8) |
|
| 107640 | 56 (56) | 81.29 [69%] | 1.38 (1.38) | 8 (8) |
aSalvador and Carapina belong to C. latiforceps, Ubu refers to an undescribed Calophya species, and C. tere refers to C. terebinthifolii (see Table 1). Values in parentheses were calculated using rarefied libraries to 100,000 sequences per sample, values before parentheses were calculated using DESeq2 normalized OTU counts.
bNumber of sequences after quality control.
cOTU defined at 97% sequence similarity.
dPredicted using a fitted zero truncated negative binomial model to 100 million sequences per sample for rarefied data only. Values in brackets are %coverage using DESeq2 normalized OTU counts.
Fig 2The microbial community richness sampled from Calophya spp.
Rarefaction curves generated in R using the package ‘vegan’. Standard deviations for each step are indicated with the semi-transparent shading.
Fig 3Comparing microbial communities associated with Calophya spp.
(A) Calophya microbiomes were compared by computing Bray-Curtis similarities using variance stabilized OTU counts, and visualized using a non-metric multidimensional scaling plot (stress = 0.09). 95% confidence ellipses are shown, and C. terebinthifolii confidence ellipses clearly do not overlap with the other Calophya spp. (B) A SIMPROF test was performed and visualized using Primer-6. Black circles indicate groups that cannot be significantly differentiated. Again, C. terebinthifolii forms a cohesive group distinguishable from the other three Calophya spp. which cannot be separated into distinct groups.