Literature DB >> 26160105

[Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications].

K R Koch1, W Trester2, N Müller-Uri3, M Trester2, C Cursiefen4, L M Heindl4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ocular prosthetics make a decisive contribution to the functional, esthetic and psychosomatic rehabilitation of patients after ocular extirpation.
OBJECTIVES: This article provides an overview of the fitting, daily care and complications of ocular prosthetics.
METHODS: The study comprised a PubMed literature review and own clinical results.
RESULTS: Ocular prosthetics made from cryolite glass or perspex can be manufactured and fitted 5-8 weeks after removal of the eye. During this period a conformer is placed within the conjunctival sac in order to prevent scar formation and shrinking of the socket. Artificial eyes can be worn continuously, only interrupted by a short but regular cleaning procedure. Artificial tears and lid hygiene improve the comfort of wearing. Glass prostheses have to be renewed every 1-2 years, while perspex prostheses need to be polished once a year. Complications, such as giant papillary conjunctivitis or blepharoconjunctivitis sicca are facilitated by poor fit, increased age and inappropriate care of the prosthetic device. In the case of socket shrinkage or anophthalmic socket syndrome, surgical interventions are needed to re-enable the use of an artificial eye.
CONCLUSION: Adequate fitting, daily care of ocular prosthetics and therapeutic management of associated complications are mandatory for a durable functional, esthetic and psychosomatic rehabilitation after ocular extirpation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial eye; Cryolite glass; Extirpation; Ocular prosthesis; Perspex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26160105     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-015-0091-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  48 in total

1.  [Orbitoplasty in patients with artificial eyes].

Authors:  M Hatt
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 0.700

Review 2.  Incomplete blinking: exposure keratopathy, lid wiper epitheliopathy, dry eye, refractive surgery, and dry contact lenses.

Authors:  Charles W McMonnies
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  [Dermal fat transplant as autologous orbital implant].

Authors:  C R Hintschich; C K Beyer-Machule
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  A survey of satisfaction in anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis.

Authors:  Jong-Suk Song; Jaeryung Oh; Se Hyun Baek
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Postinsertion care of the ocular prosthesis.

Authors:  G R Parr; B M Goldman; A O Rahn
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Prosthetic motility in pegged versus unpegged integrated porous orbital implants.

Authors:  Paulo Guillinta; Sunil N Vasani; David B Granet; Don O Kikkawa
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.746

7.  A proposed model of the response of the anophthalmic socket to prosthetic eye wear and its application to the management of mucoid discharge.

Authors:  Keith R Pine; Brian H Sloan; Robert J Jacobs
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 8.  Treatment of the anophthalmic socket.

Authors:  Francesco M Quaranta-Leoni
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  The anophthalmic socket and the prosthetic eye. A clinical and bacteriologic study.

Authors:  R J Vasquez; J V Linberg
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.746

10.  Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Philip L Custer; Robert H Kennedy; John J Woog; Sara A Kaltreider; Dale R Meyer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Cryolite glass ocular prostheses and coralline hydroxyapatite implants for eye replacement following enucleation].

Authors:  A C Rokohl; K R Koch; M Trester; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers.

Authors:  Alexander C Rokohl; Konrad R Koch; Werner Adler; Marc Trester; Wolfgang Trester; Nicola S Pine; Keith R Pine; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Severe Acute Allergic Response to Intraorbital Polymethylmethacrylate Implant.

Authors:  Sonia Phulke; Navya Naveen Kalra; Uma Handa; Subina Narang
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-04

4.  Comparison of computed tomographic ocular biometry in brachycephalic and non-brachycephalic cats.

Authors:  Kittiporn Yuwatanakorn; Chutimon Thanaboonnipat; Nalinee Tuntivanich; Damri Darawiroj; Nan Choisunirachon
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-03-23

5.  Dry anophthalmic socket syndrome - morphological alterations in meibomian glands.

Authors:  Alexander C Rokohl; Marc Trester; Parsa Naderi; Niklas Loreck; Sarah Zwingelberg; Franziska Bucher; Keith R Pine; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.775

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.