Literature DB >> 26158896

Validation of Sleep-Tracking Technology Compared with Polysomnography in Adolescents.

Massimiliano de Zambotti1, Fiona C Baker1,2, Ian M Colrain1,3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy in measuring nighttime sleep of a fitness tracker (Jawbone UP) compared to polysomnography (PSG).
DESIGN: Jawbone UP and PSG data were simultaneously collected from adolescents during an overnight laboratory recording. Agreements between Jawbone UP and PSG sleep outcomes were analyzed using paired t tests and Bland-Altman plots. Multiple regressions were used to investigate which PSG sleep measures predicted Jawbone UP "Sound sleep" and "Light sleep."
SETTING: SRI International Human Sleep Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five healthy adolescents (28 females, mean age ± standard deviation [SD]: 15.8 ± 2.5 y).
INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Outcomes showed good agreements between Jawbone UP and PSG for total sleep time (mean differences ± SD: -10.0 ± 20.5 min), sleep efficiency (mean differences ± SD: -1.9 ± 4.2 %), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) (mean differences ± SD: 10.6 ± 14.7 min). Overall, Jawbone UP overestimated PSG total sleep time and sleep efficiency and underestimated WASO but differences were small and, on average, did not exceed clinically meaningful cutoffs of > 30 min for total sleep time and > 5% for sleep efficiency. Multiple regression models showed that Jawbone UP "Sound sleep" measure was predicted by PSG time in N2 (β = 0.25), time in rapid eye movement (β = 0.29), and arousal index (β = -0.34). Jawbone UP "Light sleep" measure was predicted by PSG time in N2 (β = 0.48), time in N3 (β = 0.49), arousal index (β = 0.38) and awakening index (β = 0.28). Jawbone UP showed a progression from slight overestimation to underestimation of total sleep time and sleep efficiency with advancing age. All relationships were similar in boys and girls.
CONCLUSIONS: Jawbone UP shows good agreement with polysomnography in measures of total sleep time and wake after sleep onset in adolescent boys and girls. Further validation is needed in other age groups and clinical populations before advocating use of these inexpensive and easy-to-use devices in clinical sleep medicine and research.
© 2015 Associated Professional Sleep Societies, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actigraphy; adolescence; fitness tracker; polysomnography; sleep

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26158896      PMCID: PMC4531414          DOI: 10.5665/sleep.4990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  27 in total

1.  Further validation of actigraphy for sleep studies.

Authors:  Luciane de Souza; Ana Amélia Benedito-Silva; Maria Laura Nogueira Pires; Dalva Poyares; Sergio Tufik; Helena Maria Calil
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 2.  Wrist actigraphy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Martin; Alex D Hakim
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  How's my sleep?: Personal sleep trackers are gaining in popularity, but their accuracy is still open to debate.

Authors:  Kristina Grifantini
Journal:  IEEE Pulse       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.924

Review 4.  Use of actigraphy for assessment in pediatric sleep research.

Authors:  Lisa J Meltzer; Hawley E Montgomery-Downs; Salvatore P Insana; Colleen M Walsh
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 11.609

5.  Direct comparison of two new actigraphs and polysomnography in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Lisa J Meltzer; Colleen M Walsh; Joel Traylor; Anna M L Westin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Gender and temporal differences in sleep-wake patterns in Japanese schoolchildren.

Authors:  Alexandru Gaina; Michikazu Sekine; Shimako Hamanishi; Xiaoli Chen; Sadanobu Kagamimori
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Evaluation of the association of menopausal status with delta and beta EEG activity during sleep.

Authors:  Ian G Campbell; Joyce T Bromberger; Daniel J Buysse; Martica H Hall; Kimberly A Hardin; Howard M Kravitz; Karen A Matthews; Marianne O'Neill Rasor; Jessica Utts; Ellen Gold
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Movement toward a novel activity monitoring device.

Authors:  Hawley E Montgomery-Downs; Salvatore P Insana; Jonathan A Bond
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Estimating sleep patterns with activity monitoring in children and adolescents: how many nights are necessary for reliable measures?

Authors:  C Acebo; A Sadeh; R Seifer; O Tzischinsky; A R Wolfson; A Hafer; M A Carskadon
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Issues of validity in actigraphic sleep assessment.

Authors:  Warren W Tryon
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

View more
  50 in total

1.  Fitness Tracker to Assess Sleep: Beyond the Market.

Authors:  Dalva Poyares; Camila Hirotsu; Sergio Tufik
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Ability of the Multisensory Jawbone UP3 to Quantify and Classify Sleep in Patients With Suspected Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: A Comparison Against Polysomnography and Actigraphy.

Authors:  Jesse D Cook; Michael L Prairie; David T Plante
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Accuracy of a smartphone application in estimating sleep in children.

Authors:  Pious Patel; Ji Young Kim; Lee J Brooks
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 4.  Sensors Capabilities, Performance, and Use of Consumer Sleep Technology.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Luca Menghini; Michela Sarlo; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2020-01-03

5.  The Boom in Wearable Technology: Cause for Alarm or Just What is Needed to Better Understand Sleep?

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Job G Godino; Fiona C Baker; Joseph Cheung; Kevin Patrick; Ian M Colrain
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  How reliable are commercially available trackers in detecting daytime sleep.

Authors:  Philip Lambrechtse; Victoria C Ziesenitz; Adam Cohen; Johannes N van den Anker; Ernst Jan Bos
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Sleep Parameter Assessment Accuracy of a Consumer Home Sleep Monitoring Ballistocardiograph Beddit Sleep Tracker: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Jarno Tuominen; Karoliina Peltola; Tarja Saaresranta; Katja Valli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Validation of sleep measurement in a multisensor consumer grade wearable device in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer C Kanady; Leslie Ruoff; Laura D Straus; Jonathan Varbel; Thomas Metzler; Anne Richards; Sabra S Inslicht; Aoife O'Donovan; Jennifer Hlavin; Thomas C Neylan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Wearable technologies for developing sleep and circadian biomarkers: a summary of workshop discussions.

Authors:  Christopher M Depner; Philip C Cheng; Jaime K Devine; Seema Khosla; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Rébecca Robillard; Andrew Vakulin; Sean P A Drummond
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Evaluation of a consumer fitness-tracking device to assess sleep in adults.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Stephanie Claudatos; Sarah Inkelis; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.