Literature DB >> 26158105

Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: robust texture feature identification and equivalence across devices.

Brad M Keller1, Andrew Oustimov1, Yan Wang1, Jinbo Chen2, Raymond J Acciavatti1, Yuanjie Zheng1, Shonket Ray1, James C Gee1, Andrew D A Maidment1, Despina Kontos1.   

Abstract

An analytical framework is presented for evaluating the equivalence of parenchymal texture features across different full-field digital mammography (FFDM) systems using a physical breast phantom. Phantom images (FOR PROCESSING) are acquired from three FFDM systems using their automated exposure control setting. A panel of texture features, including gray-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, and structural descriptors, are extracted. To identify features that are robust across imaging systems, a series of equivalence tests are performed on the feature distributions, in which the extent of their intersystem variation is compared to their intrasystem variation via the Hodges-Lehmann test statistic. Overall, histogram and structural features tend to be most robust across all systems, and certain features, such as edge enhancement, tend to be more robust to intergenerational differences between detectors of a single vendor than to intervendor differences. Texture features extracted from larger regions of interest (i.e., [Formula: see text]) and with a larger offset length (i.e., [Formula: see text]), when applicable, also appear to be more robust across imaging systems. This framework and observations from our experiments may benefit applications utilizing mammographic texture analysis on images acquired in multivendor settings, such as in multicenter studies of computer-aided detection and breast cancer risk assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital mammography; parenchymal pattern; robust texture features

Year:  2015        PMID: 26158105      PMCID: PMC4478863          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.2.024501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  26 in total

1.  Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Hetal Ved; Stephen P Baker; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Zhimin Huo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Li Lan; Barbara L Weber; Ioana Bonta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Face description with local binary patterns: application to face recognition.

Authors:  Timo Ahonen; Abdenour Hadid; Matti Pietikäinen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Variability of breast density assessment in short-term reimaging with digital mammography.

Authors:  Won Hwa Kim; Woo Kyung Moon; Sun Mi Kim; Ann Yi; Jung Min Chang; Hye Ryoung Koo; Su Hyun Lee; Nariya Cho
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  N F Boyd; G A Lockwood; J W Byng; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.

Authors:  C B Caldwell; S J Stapleton; D W Holdsworth; R A Jong; W J Weiser; G Cooke; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences.

Authors:  John J Heine; Poonam Malhotra
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Identification of masses in digital mammogram using gray level co-occurrence matrices.

Authors:  A Mohd Khuzi; R Besar; Wmd Wan Zaki; Nn Ahmad
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2009-07-01

10.  The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities.

Authors:  N F Boyd; J Stone; L J Martin; R Jong; E Fishell; M Yaffe; G Hammond; S Minkin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  14 in total

1.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Yuanjie Zheng; Brad M Keller; Shonket Ray; Yan Wang; Emily F Conant; James C Gee; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Vestibular and corticospinal control of human body orientation in the gravitational field.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.

Authors:  Shonket Ray; Lin Chen; Brad M Keller; Jinbo Chen; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Model-based approach to investigate equipment-induced error in pressure-waveform derived hemodynamic measurements.

Authors:  Masoud Farahmand; Hossein Mirinejad; Christopher G Scully
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Lauren Pantalone; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Stacey J Winham; Andrew Oustimov; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Aimilia Gastounioti; Dana H Whaley; Carrie B Hruska; Karla Kerlikowske; Kathleen Brandt; Emily F Conant; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Cancer imaging phenomics toolkit: quantitative imaging analytics for precision diagnostics and predictive modeling of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Christos Davatzikos; Saima Rathore; Spyridon Bakas; Sarthak Pati; Mark Bergman; Ratheesh Kalarot; Patmaa Sridharan; Aimilia Gastounioti; Nariman Jahani; Eric Cohen; Hamed Akbari; Birkan Tunc; Jimit Doshi; Drew Parker; Michael Hsieh; Aristeidis Sotiras; Hongming Li; Yangming Ou; Robert K Doot; Michel Bilello; Yong Fan; Russell T Shinohara; Paul Yushkevich; Ragini Verma; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-11

9.  Detecting the "gist" of breast cancer in mammograms three years before localized signs of cancer are visible.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne-Marie Culpan; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Radiogenomics analysis identifies correlations of digital mammography with clinical molecular signatures in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jose-Gerardo Tamez-Peña; Juan-Andrés Rodriguez-Rojas; Hugo Gomez-Rueda; Jose-Maria Celaya-Padilla; Roxana-Alicia Rivera-Prieto; Rebeca Palacios-Corona; Margarita Garza-Montemayor; Servando Cardona-Huerta; Victor Treviño
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.