Literature DB >> 26158095

Evaluation of position-estimation methods applied to CZT-based photon-counting detectors for dedicated breast CT.

Andrey Makeev1, Martin Clajus2, Scott Snyder2, Xiaolang Wang3, Stephen J Glick1.   

Abstract

Semiconductor photon-counting detectors based on high atomic number, high density materials [cadmium zinc telluride (CZT)/cadmium telluride (CdTe)] for x-ray computed tomography (CT) provide advantages over conventional energy-integrating detectors, including reduced electronic and Swank noise, wider dynamic range, capability of spectral CT, and improved signal-to-noise ratio. Certain CT applications require high spatial resolution. In breast CT, for example, visualization of microcalcifications and assessment of tumor microvasculature after contrast enhancement require resolution on the order of [Formula: see text]. A straightforward approach to increasing spatial resolution of pixellated CZT-based radiation detectors by merely decreasing the pixel size leads to two problems: (1) fabricating circuitry with small pixels becomes costly and (2) inter-pixel charge spreading can obviate any improvement in spatial resolution. We have used computer simulations to investigate position estimation algorithms that utilize charge sharing to achieve subpixel position resolution. To study these algorithms, we model a simple detector geometry with a [Formula: see text] array of [Formula: see text] pixels, and use a conditional probability function to model charge transport in CZT. We used COMSOL finite element method software to map the distribution of charge pulses and the Monte Carlo package PENELOPE for simulating fluorescent radiation. Performance of two x-ray interaction position estimation algorithms was evaluated: the method of maximum-likelihood estimation and a fast, practical algorithm that can be implemented in a readout application-specific integrated circuit and allows for identification of a quadrant of the pixel in which the interaction occurred. Both methods demonstrate good subpixel resolution; however, their actual efficiency is limited by the presence of fluorescent [Formula: see text]-escape photons. Current experimental breast CT systems typically use detectors with a pixel size of [Formula: see text], with [Formula: see text] binning during the acquisition giving an effective pixel size of [Formula: see text]. Thus, it would be expected that the position estimate accuracy reported in this study would improve detection and visualization of microcalcifications as compared to that with conventional detectors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  maximum-likelihood position estimation; photon-counting detector; subpixel resolution

Year:  2015        PMID: 26158095      PMCID: PMC4478882          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.2.023501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  6 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction using a CdZnTe-based computed tomography system: comparison to flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  Q Le Huy; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Photon counting spectral CT versus conventional CT: comparative evaluation for breast imaging application.

Authors:  Polad M Shikhaliev; Shannon G Fritz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Modeling the performance of a photon counting x-ray detector for CT: energy response and pulse pileup effects.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Taguchi; Mengxi Zhang; Eric C Frey; Xiaolan Wang; Jan S Iwanczyk; Einar Nygard; Neal E Hartsough; Benjamin M W Tsui; William C Barber
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Calibration Method for ML Estimation of 3D Interaction Position in a Thick Gamma-Ray Detector.

Authors:  William C J Hunter; Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 1.679

5.  Maximum-Likelihood Estimation With a Contracting-Grid Search Algorithm.

Authors:  Jacob Y Hesterman; Luca Caucci; Matthew A Kupinski; Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.679

6.  Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors.

Authors:  S A Feig; G S Shaber; A Patchefsky; G F Schwartz; J Edeiken; H I Libshitz; R Nerlinger; R F Curley; J D Wallace
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.959

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.